EFFECTS OF NEUROLEPTICS WITH OR WITHOUT ANTI-CHOLINERGICS AMONG SCHIZOPHRENIC PATIENTS OF SOUTH GUJARAT

Pradipsinh Sodha, Haiya Sheth, Preeti Yadav, Hita Rana, Mayur Chaudhari, Kajal Chaudhari, Tushar Talavia
{"title":"EFFECTS OF NEUROLEPTICS WITH OR WITHOUT ANTI-CHOLINERGICS AMONG SCHIZOPHRENIC PATIENTS OF SOUTH GUJARAT","authors":"Pradipsinh Sodha, Haiya Sheth, Preeti Yadav, Hita Rana, Mayur Chaudhari, Kajal Chaudhari, Tushar Talavia","doi":"10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i5.50369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Neuroleptics (or anti-psychotics) indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia have significant dose-limiting extra-pyramidal side effects (EPS). Literature suggests limited evidence for the efficacy of anticholinergics in the treatment of neuroleptic-induced EPS. Thus, the present study was conducted to understand the effects of anti-cholinergics on EPS among schizophrenics already on neuroleptics (typical and atypical).\nMethods: This prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Gujarat for 15 months. A total of 200 participants were included based on selection criteria and distributed equally among four groups (A, B, C, and D) of 50 participants each. The collected data were analyzed for sociodemographic profile, current treatment regimen, type of neuroleptic drug, present complaints of EPS, and addition of any anti-cholinergic agent. An abnormal involuntarily movement scale score was used for examining movement disorders in all study participants. Descriptive statistical analysis was done using Microsoft Excel 2019 and IBM SPSS software version 28, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.\nResults: Hundred patients who were prescribed typical neuroleptics were divided into groups A (with anti-cholinergic) and B (without anti-cholinergic), whereas the remaining 100 patients being prescribed atypical neuroleptics were divided into groups C (with anti-cholinergic) and D (without anti-cholinergic) by simple randomization. The majority of 56% were young adults (18–35 years) with an overall male pre-ponderance (2.14:1). Out of 50 participants in both groups A and B, a higher number of group B participants experienced tremors, rigidity, difficulty in movements, and tardive dyskinesia (TD) (48/50 vs. 30/50, 36/50 vs. 6/50, 24/50 vs. 1/50, 36/50 vs. 19/50) as compared to group A, respectively. Similar results were noted with groups C and D, where a higher number of group D participants experienced tremors, rigidity, difficulty in movements, and tardive dyskinesia (TD) (15/50 vs. 5/50, 11/50 vs. 3/50, 18/50 vs. 2/50, and 16/50 vs. 4/50, respectively). All the results were statistically significant (p<0.05).\nConclusion: There was a significant reduction in EPS among schizophrenia patients who were prescribed atypical over typical neuroleptics. The addition of one anticholinergic to the drug regimen also significantly reduced the frequency of EPS in schizophrenia patients.","PeriodicalId":504156,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","volume":"113 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i5.50369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Neuroleptics (or anti-psychotics) indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia have significant dose-limiting extra-pyramidal side effects (EPS). Literature suggests limited evidence for the efficacy of anticholinergics in the treatment of neuroleptic-induced EPS. Thus, the present study was conducted to understand the effects of anti-cholinergics on EPS among schizophrenics already on neuroleptics (typical and atypical). Methods: This prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Gujarat for 15 months. A total of 200 participants were included based on selection criteria and distributed equally among four groups (A, B, C, and D) of 50 participants each. The collected data were analyzed for sociodemographic profile, current treatment regimen, type of neuroleptic drug, present complaints of EPS, and addition of any anti-cholinergic agent. An abnormal involuntarily movement scale score was used for examining movement disorders in all study participants. Descriptive statistical analysis was done using Microsoft Excel 2019 and IBM SPSS software version 28, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Hundred patients who were prescribed typical neuroleptics were divided into groups A (with anti-cholinergic) and B (without anti-cholinergic), whereas the remaining 100 patients being prescribed atypical neuroleptics were divided into groups C (with anti-cholinergic) and D (without anti-cholinergic) by simple randomization. The majority of 56% were young adults (18–35 years) with an overall male pre-ponderance (2.14:1). Out of 50 participants in both groups A and B, a higher number of group B participants experienced tremors, rigidity, difficulty in movements, and tardive dyskinesia (TD) (48/50 vs. 30/50, 36/50 vs. 6/50, 24/50 vs. 1/50, 36/50 vs. 19/50) as compared to group A, respectively. Similar results were noted with groups C and D, where a higher number of group D participants experienced tremors, rigidity, difficulty in movements, and tardive dyskinesia (TD) (15/50 vs. 5/50, 11/50 vs. 3/50, 18/50 vs. 2/50, and 16/50 vs. 4/50, respectively). All the results were statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: There was a significant reduction in EPS among schizophrenia patients who were prescribed atypical over typical neuroleptics. The addition of one anticholinergic to the drug regimen also significantly reduced the frequency of EPS in schizophrenia patients.
南古吉拉特邦精神分裂症患者服用或不服用抗胆碱能药物对神经安定剂的影响
目的:用于治疗精神分裂症的神经安定剂(或抗精神病药)具有明显的剂量限制性锥体外系副作用(EPS)。文献显示,抗胆碱能药物治疗神经安定剂诱发的 EPS 的疗效证据有限。因此,本研究旨在了解抗胆碱能药物对已服用神经安定药(典型和非典型)的精神分裂症患者的 EPS 的影响:这项前瞻性、横断面、观察性研究在南古吉拉特邦的一家三级医疗教学医院进行,为期 15 个月。根据选择标准,共纳入 200 名参与者,并平均分配到四个组(A、B、C 和 D 组),每组 50 人。对收集到的数据进行了分析,包括社会人口学特征、目前的治疗方案、神经安定药物的类型、目前的 EPS 主诉以及是否添加了任何抗胆碱能药物。异常不自主运动量表用于检查所有研究参与者的运动障碍。使用 Microsoft Excel 2019 和 IBM SPSS 软件 28 版进行描述性统计分析,P<0.05 为差异有统计学意义:100名接受典型神经安定药物治疗的患者被分为A组(含抗胆碱能药物)和B组(不含抗胆碱能药物),而其余100名接受非典型神经安定药物治疗的患者则通过简单随机法被分为C组(含抗胆碱能药物)和D组(不含抗胆碱能药物)。其中,56%的患者为年轻人(18-35 岁),男性占多数(2.14:1)。在 A 组和 B 组的 50 名参与者中,与 A 组相比,B 组参与者出现震颤、僵直、运动困难和迟发性运动障碍(TD)的人数较多(分别为 48/50 对 30/50、36/50 对 6/50、24/50 对 1/50、36/50 对 19/50)。C 组和 D 组的结果类似,D 组出现震颤、僵直、运动困难和迟发性运动障碍(TD)的人数较多(分别为 15/50 对 5/50、11/50 对 3/50、18/50 对 2/50 和 16/50 对 4/50)。所有结果均有统计学意义(P<0.05):结论:服用非典型神经安定药的精神分裂症患者的 EPS 明显少于服用典型神经安定药的患者。在用药方案中添加一种抗胆碱能药物,也能显著降低精神分裂症患者的 EPS 发生频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信