ASEAN REGULATION OF SENSITIVE SPACE TECHNOLOGIES IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

Naek Siregar, Ahmad Syofyan, Melly Aida, Eunike Christine Kyrieleison4
{"title":"ASEAN REGULATION OF SENSITIVE SPACE TECHNOLOGIES IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","authors":"Naek Siregar, Ahmad Syofyan, Melly Aida, Eunike Christine Kyrieleison4","doi":"10.25041/lajil.v6i1.3312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Space technology has developed as a result of technology’s quick advancement. It is important to give attention to the development of space technology. This paper describes the regulation of sensitive space technology in ASEAN countries, which is made through a comparison table. Space-sensitive technology is advanced for conducting space activities, so it is prestigious for each country. Unlimited space makes it necessary to regulate the implementation of space activities. In general, the regulation of space activities is formed in international law. In particular, the regulation of space activities is formed in the national law of each country that has carried out space activities. The research methodology used is descriptive qualitative, with data sources from literature studies. The purpose of writing this research is to find out and compare how the regulation of sensitive technology of space activities in ASEAN countries can be a reference or reference for Indonesia in preparing national regulations on sensitive technology of space. The results showed that the comparison of sensitive technology arrangements in ASEAN countries is that Indonesia already has a Space Act that regulates the space sector. Malaysia has a Space Act and Space Regulations that regulate space activities. Singapore does not yet have a specific law governing sensitive space technology; however, the government adheres to this law.","PeriodicalId":34314,"journal":{"name":"Lampung Journal of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lampung Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/lajil.v6i1.3312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Space technology has developed as a result of technology’s quick advancement. It is important to give attention to the development of space technology. This paper describes the regulation of sensitive space technology in ASEAN countries, which is made through a comparison table. Space-sensitive technology is advanced for conducting space activities, so it is prestigious for each country. Unlimited space makes it necessary to regulate the implementation of space activities. In general, the regulation of space activities is formed in international law. In particular, the regulation of space activities is formed in the national law of each country that has carried out space activities. The research methodology used is descriptive qualitative, with data sources from literature studies. The purpose of writing this research is to find out and compare how the regulation of sensitive technology of space activities in ASEAN countries can be a reference or reference for Indonesia in preparing national regulations on sensitive technology of space. The results showed that the comparison of sensitive technology arrangements in ASEAN countries is that Indonesia already has a Space Act that regulates the space sector. Malaysia has a Space Act and Space Regulations that regulate space activities. Singapore does not yet have a specific law governing sensitive space technology; however, the government adheres to this law.
从比较角度看东盟对敏感空间技术的监管
空间技术的发展是科技快速进步的结果。关注空间技术的发展非常重要。本文通过对比表格介绍了东盟国家对敏感空间技术的监管情况。空间敏感技术是进行空间活动的先进技术,因此对每个国家来说都很重要。无限的空间使得有必要对空间活动的实施进行监管。一般来说,空间活动的监管是在国际法中形成的。特别是,开展空间活动的每个国家的国内法都对空间活动进行了规范。采用的研究方法是描述性定性研究,数据来源于文献研究。撰写本研究报告的目的是了解和比较东盟国家对空间活动敏感技术的监管如何为印尼制定国家空间敏感技术法规提供参考或借鉴。研究结果表明,比较东盟国家的敏感技术安排,印尼已经有了规范空间部门的《空间法》。马来西亚制定了《空间法》和《空间条例》来规范空间活动。新加坡还没有关于敏感空间技术的具体法律,但政府遵守这一法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信