Strategic threat health response in Australia capital cities: Predicting the optimum locations for field hospitals through geospatial analysis

Mazen Baazeem, E. Kruger, M. Tennant
{"title":"Strategic threat health response in Australia capital cities: Predicting the optimum locations for field hospitals through geospatial analysis","authors":"Mazen Baazeem, E. Kruger, M. Tennant","doi":"10.1002/puh2.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advent of the COVID‐19 pandemic has accentuated the critical importance of epidemic preparedness within national healthcare systems. This study presents a geospatial analysis aimed at optimising the placement of field hospitals in Australia to ensure adequate healthcare access during pandemics.The latest census data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics were integrated with the spatial locations of current emergency departments within Australian capitals. Buffer zones with a 7.5 km radius were created around the public emergency departments (EDs). Buffer zones outside the 7.5 km radius that exhibited high population densities were categorised into high‐density (red), moderate‐density (yellow) and low‐density (green) zones to prioritise and tailor healthcare responses during a pandemic. The identification of high‐density population areas outside the ED radius enabled the stratification of potential sites for ED facilities.Ninety‐one potential field hospital sites were identified across Australia's capital cities. The findings indicate that the addition of these sites would place over 95% of the population within a 7.5 km radius of an ED facility. This network of proposed sites is designed to serve a spectrum of population densities, ensuring equitable healthcare access for both densely populated urban centres and less populated areas.This study underscores the potential of field hospitals to strengthen Australia's public health system against emergencies. By advocating for the creation of 91 field hospitals within a 7.5 km reach for over 95% of urban dwellers across major cities, it demonstrates a strategic approach to ensure comprehensive ED coverage. Drawing on international examples, including China's Fangcang hospitals, the USA's post‐acute care (PAC) facilities and the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS) Nightingale Hospitals, it highlights the need for healthcare agility and scalability, especially during pandemic outbreaks. The research presents a blueprint for field hospital deployment, marking a significant advancement in public health logistics and protection across Australia's varied demographic and geographical landscapes.","PeriodicalId":74613,"journal":{"name":"Public health challenges","volume":" 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advent of the COVID‐19 pandemic has accentuated the critical importance of epidemic preparedness within national healthcare systems. This study presents a geospatial analysis aimed at optimising the placement of field hospitals in Australia to ensure adequate healthcare access during pandemics.The latest census data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics were integrated with the spatial locations of current emergency departments within Australian capitals. Buffer zones with a 7.5 km radius were created around the public emergency departments (EDs). Buffer zones outside the 7.5 km radius that exhibited high population densities were categorised into high‐density (red), moderate‐density (yellow) and low‐density (green) zones to prioritise and tailor healthcare responses during a pandemic. The identification of high‐density population areas outside the ED radius enabled the stratification of potential sites for ED facilities.Ninety‐one potential field hospital sites were identified across Australia's capital cities. The findings indicate that the addition of these sites would place over 95% of the population within a 7.5 km radius of an ED facility. This network of proposed sites is designed to serve a spectrum of population densities, ensuring equitable healthcare access for both densely populated urban centres and less populated areas.This study underscores the potential of field hospitals to strengthen Australia's public health system against emergencies. By advocating for the creation of 91 field hospitals within a 7.5 km reach for over 95% of urban dwellers across major cities, it demonstrates a strategic approach to ensure comprehensive ED coverage. Drawing on international examples, including China's Fangcang hospitals, the USA's post‐acute care (PAC) facilities and the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS) Nightingale Hospitals, it highlights the need for healthcare agility and scalability, especially during pandemic outbreaks. The research presents a blueprint for field hospital deployment, marking a significant advancement in public health logistics and protection across Australia's varied demographic and geographical landscapes.
澳大利亚首府城市的战略性健康威胁应对措施:通过地理空间分析预测野战医院的最佳位置
COVID-19 大流行的出现凸显了国家医疗保健系统内流行病防备工作的极端重要性。本研究介绍了一种地理空间分析方法,旨在优化澳大利亚野战医院的布局,以确保在大流行病期间提供充足的医疗服务。澳大利亚统计局提供的最新人口普查数据与澳大利亚各首府现有急诊科的空间位置进行了整合。以 7.5 公里为半径,在公立急诊室周围建立了缓冲区。半径为 7.5 千米以外的缓冲区人口密度较高,被划分为高密度区(红色)、中等密度区(黄色)和低密度区(绿色),以便在大流行期间优先采取有针对性的医疗保健应对措施。通过识别急诊室半径外的高密度人口区,对急诊室设施的潜在选址进行了分层。研究结果表明,如果增加这些地点,将有超过 95% 的人口处于急诊室设施 7.5 公里半径范围内。该研究强调了野战医院在加强澳大利亚公共卫生系统应对突发事件方面的潜力。这项研究强调了澳大利亚加强公共卫生系统应对突发事件的潜力,主张在各大城市中为超过95%的城市居民在7.5公里的范围内建立91所野战医院,从而展示了一种确保紧急医疗救援全面覆盖的战略方法。通过借鉴国际范例,包括中国的芳村医院、美国的急性期后护理(PAC)设施和英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)的南丁格尔医院,该研究强调了医疗灵活性和可扩展性的必要性,尤其是在大流行病爆发期间。这项研究为野战医院的部署描绘了蓝图,标志着澳大利亚不同人口和地理环境下的公共卫生后勤和保护工作取得了重大进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信