Analysis of e-government and digital society indicators over the years: a comparative study of the EU member states

Martin Lnenicka, Mariusz Luterek, Lorraine Tinashe Majo
{"title":"Analysis of e-government and digital society indicators over the years: a comparative study of the EU member states","authors":"Martin Lnenicka, Mariusz Luterek, Lorraine Tinashe Majo","doi":"10.1108/dprg-07-2023-0103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nBenchmarking e-government and digital society developments using relevant indicators provides crucial insights into what aspects to consider while building a resilient digital society in which digital public services are delivered effectively and sustainably. The purpose of this paper is to analyse selected indices and indicators over the years and provide findings and recommendations on what indicators contribute most to the development.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA mixed research approach was used to conduct the research and collect, analyse and interpret data. A qualitative analysis involving the search, decomposition and comparison approaches to identify e-government and digital society reports, indices, rankings and indicators was followed by a quantitative analysis comprising of regression and cluster analyses.\n\nFindings\nThe findings revealed that changes in the mix of indicators used by e-government and digital society indices can be attributed to advances in ICT and channels through which people communicate and receive information. The authors found that digital and telecommunication infrastructures and the quality of their parameters such as broadband have the biggest influence on progress of the e-government and digital societies developments and contribute most to clustering of the EU member states into groups.\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper provides insights into how the structures of related indices changed over the years and how different indicators contribute to benchmarking of e-government and digital society developments by means of their weights. It provides governments with recommendations on which indicators to focus most.\n","PeriodicalId":515139,"journal":{"name":"Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-07-2023-0103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Benchmarking e-government and digital society developments using relevant indicators provides crucial insights into what aspects to consider while building a resilient digital society in which digital public services are delivered effectively and sustainably. The purpose of this paper is to analyse selected indices and indicators over the years and provide findings and recommendations on what indicators contribute most to the development. Design/methodology/approach A mixed research approach was used to conduct the research and collect, analyse and interpret data. A qualitative analysis involving the search, decomposition and comparison approaches to identify e-government and digital society reports, indices, rankings and indicators was followed by a quantitative analysis comprising of regression and cluster analyses. Findings The findings revealed that changes in the mix of indicators used by e-government and digital society indices can be attributed to advances in ICT and channels through which people communicate and receive information. The authors found that digital and telecommunication infrastructures and the quality of their parameters such as broadband have the biggest influence on progress of the e-government and digital societies developments and contribute most to clustering of the EU member states into groups. Originality/value The paper provides insights into how the structures of related indices changed over the years and how different indicators contribute to benchmarking of e-government and digital society developments by means of their weights. It provides governments with recommendations on which indicators to focus most.
多年来电子政务和数字社会指标分析:欧盟成员国比较研究
目的 使用相关指标对电子政务和数字社会的发展情况进行基准分析,可以帮助我们深入了解在建设有弹性的数字社会时需要考虑哪些方面,从而有效和可持续地提供数字公共服务。本文旨在分析多年来选定的指数和指标,并就哪些指标对发展贡献最大提供结论和建议。研究结果研究结果表明,电子政务和数字社会指数所使用的指标组合的变化可归因于信息和通信技术的进步以及人们沟通和接收信息的渠道。作者发现,数字和电信基础设施及其参数(如宽带)的质量对电子政务和数字社会发展的进展影响最大,对欧盟成员国的分组贡献最大。它为各国政府提供了最应关注哪些指标的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信