Olanzapine versus standard antiemetic prophylaxis for the prevention of post-discharge nausea and vomiting after propofol-based general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Binayak Deb, Kulbhushan Saini, S. Arora, Sanjay Kumar, S. Soni, Manu Saini
{"title":"Olanzapine versus standard antiemetic prophylaxis for the prevention of post-discharge nausea and vomiting after propofol-based general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial","authors":"Binayak Deb, Kulbhushan Saini, S. Arora, Sanjay Kumar, S. Soni, Manu Saini","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_1162_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Post-discharge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) is a pertinent problem in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of the novel drug olanzapine, which has proved its efficiency in patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy for PDNV prevention.\n \n \n \n This randomised controlled trial recruited 106 adult patients (18–65 years) undergoing highly emetogenic daycare surgeries with propofol-based general anaesthesia (GA). Group O received preoperative oral olanzapine 10 mg, and Group C, acting as a control, received 8 mg of intravenous dexamethasone and 4 mg of ondansetron intraoperatively. The primary outcome was nausea (numeric rating scale >3) and/or vomiting 24 h after discharge. Secondary outcomes included nausea and vomiting in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU), severe nausea, vomiting and side effects. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and the independent samples t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess any non-random associations between the categorical variables.\n \n \n \n The incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting were similar in both groups within PACU (four patients experienced nausea and vomiting, three had severe symptoms in Group O, P = 0.057) and in the post-discharge period (three patients in Group O had nausea and vomiting compared to five patients in Group C, of which four were severe, P = 0.484). The side effects (sedation, dizziness, and light-headedness) were comparable between the two groups.\n \n \n \n A single preoperative oral olanzapine can be an effective alternative to standard antiemetic prophylaxis involving dexamethasone and ondansetron for preventing PDNV in highly emetogenic daycare surgeries with propofol-based GA.\n","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1162_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-discharge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) is a pertinent problem in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of the novel drug olanzapine, which has proved its efficiency in patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy for PDNV prevention. This randomised controlled trial recruited 106 adult patients (18–65 years) undergoing highly emetogenic daycare surgeries with propofol-based general anaesthesia (GA). Group O received preoperative oral olanzapine 10 mg, and Group C, acting as a control, received 8 mg of intravenous dexamethasone and 4 mg of ondansetron intraoperatively. The primary outcome was nausea (numeric rating scale >3) and/or vomiting 24 h after discharge. Secondary outcomes included nausea and vomiting in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU), severe nausea, vomiting and side effects. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and the independent samples t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess any non-random associations between the categorical variables. The incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting were similar in both groups within PACU (four patients experienced nausea and vomiting, three had severe symptoms in Group O, P = 0.057) and in the post-discharge period (three patients in Group O had nausea and vomiting compared to five patients in Group C, of which four were severe, P = 0.484). The side effects (sedation, dizziness, and light-headedness) were comparable between the two groups. A single preoperative oral olanzapine can be an effective alternative to standard antiemetic prophylaxis involving dexamethasone and ondansetron for preventing PDNV in highly emetogenic daycare surgeries with propofol-based GA.
在预防异丙酚全身麻醉后出院后恶心和呕吐方面,奥氮平与标准止吐药的比较:随机对照试验
出院后恶心呕吐(PDNV)是门诊手术患者面临的一个相关问题。这项研究的目的是评估新型药物奥氮平的疗效,该药物已在接受高致吐性化疗的患者中证明了其预防 PDNV 的有效性。 这项随机对照试验招募了 106 名成年患者(18-65 岁),他们都接受了以异丙酚为基础的全身麻醉(GA)下的高催吐日间护理手术。O 组在术前口服 10 毫克奥氮平,C 组作为对照组,在术中静脉注射 8 毫克地塞米松和 4 毫克昂丹司琼。主要结果是出院后 24 小时内出现恶心(数字评分量表>3)和/或呕吐。次要结果包括麻醉后护理病房(PACU)中的恶心和呕吐、严重恶心、呕吐和副作用。正态性采用 Shapiro-Wilk 检验进行评估,连续变量的比较采用独立样本 t 检验或 Mann-Whitney U 检验。费雪精确检验用于评估分类变量之间的任何非随机关联。 两组患者术后恶心和呕吐的发生率和严重程度在PACU内(O组有4名患者出现恶心和呕吐,其中3人症状严重,P=0.057)和出院后(O组有3名患者出现恶心和呕吐,C组有5名患者,其中4人症状严重,P=0.484)相似。两组的副作用(镇静、头晕和头重脚轻)相当。 在使用异丙酚麻醉的高致呕吐日间护理手术中,术前口服一次奥氮平可有效替代地塞米松和昂丹司琼等标准止吐药,预防 PDNV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信