Analysis of Copula Frailty defective models in presence of Cure Fraction

Q4 Medicine
Ola Abuelamayem
{"title":"Analysis of Copula Frailty defective models in presence of Cure Fraction","authors":"Ola Abuelamayem","doi":"10.18502/jbe.v9i3.15446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Analyzing long term survivors such as diabetic patients can't be done using the usual survival models. One approach to analyze it is using defective distribution that doesn't force a pre-assumption of cure fraction to the model. To study more than one random variable interacting together, multivariate distributions may be used. However, most of multivariate distributions have complicated forms, which make the computations difficult. Besides, it may be hard to find a multivariate distribution that fits the data properly, especially in health care field. To get over this problem, one can use copula approach. In literature, to the best of our knowledge, only one paper handled copula defective models and didn't consider the effect of covariates. In this paper, we take into consideration not only existed covariates but also unobserved ones by including frailty term. \nMethods: Two new models are introduced. The first model, used Gumbel copula to take the dependence into consideration together with the observed covariates. The second one take into consideration not only the dependence but also the unobserved covariates by integrating frailty term in to the model. \nResults: A diabetic retinopathy data is analyzed. The two models indicated the existence of long-term survivals through negative parameters without the need of pre-assuming the existence of it. Including frailty term to the model helped in capturing more dependence between the variables. We compared the results using goodness of fit methods, and the results suggested that the model with frailty term is the best to be used. \nConclusion: The two introduced models correctly detected the existence of cure fraction with less estimated parameters than that in mixture cure fraction models. Also, it has the advantage of not pre-assuming the existence of cure fraction to the model. comparing both models, the model with frailty term fitted the data better.","PeriodicalId":34310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v9i3.15446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Analyzing long term survivors such as diabetic patients can't be done using the usual survival models. One approach to analyze it is using defective distribution that doesn't force a pre-assumption of cure fraction to the model. To study more than one random variable interacting together, multivariate distributions may be used. However, most of multivariate distributions have complicated forms, which make the computations difficult. Besides, it may be hard to find a multivariate distribution that fits the data properly, especially in health care field. To get over this problem, one can use copula approach. In literature, to the best of our knowledge, only one paper handled copula defective models and didn't consider the effect of covariates. In this paper, we take into consideration not only existed covariates but also unobserved ones by including frailty term. Methods: Two new models are introduced. The first model, used Gumbel copula to take the dependence into consideration together with the observed covariates. The second one take into consideration not only the dependence but also the unobserved covariates by integrating frailty term in to the model. Results: A diabetic retinopathy data is analyzed. The two models indicated the existence of long-term survivals through negative parameters without the need of pre-assuming the existence of it. Including frailty term to the model helped in capturing more dependence between the variables. We compared the results using goodness of fit methods, and the results suggested that the model with frailty term is the best to be used. Conclusion: The two introduced models correctly detected the existence of cure fraction with less estimated parameters than that in mixture cure fraction models. Also, it has the advantage of not pre-assuming the existence of cure fraction to the model. comparing both models, the model with frailty term fitted the data better.
存在治愈率的 Copula 脆弱性缺陷模型分析
简介对糖尿病患者等长期存活者进行分析,不能使用通常的生存模型。分析的一种方法是使用缺陷分布,这种分布不强迫模型预先假定治愈率。要研究多个随机变量的相互作用,可以使用多元分布。然而,大多数多元分布形式复杂,给计算带来困难。此外,可能很难找到适合数据的多元分布,尤其是在医疗保健领域。为了解决这个问题,我们可以使用 copula 方法。据我们所知,文献中只有一篇论文处理了 copula 缺陷模型,并且没有考虑协变量的影响。在本文中,我们不仅考虑了存在的协变量,还通过加入虚弱项考虑了未观察到的协变量。方法本文引入了两个新模型。第一个模型使用 Gumbel copula 将依赖性与观察到的协变量一并考虑。第二个模型不仅考虑了依赖性,还通过在模型中加入虚弱项考虑了未观察到的协变量。结果:对糖尿病视网膜病变数据进行了分析。这两个模型通过负参数显示了长期存活率的存在,而无需预先假定其存在。在模型中加入虚弱项有助于捕捉变量之间的更多依赖关系。我们使用拟合优度方法对结果进行了比较,结果表明,带有虚弱项的模型最适合使用。结论与混合治愈率模型相比,两种引入的模型能以较少的估计参数正确检测出治愈率的存在。此外,它还具有不预先假定模型中存在治愈率的优点。比较两种模型,带虚弱项的模型更适合数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信