R. M. Erhardt, Kristen Jafflin, N. Zepro, Charles Abongomera, A. Chernet, Daniel H. Paris, Sonja Merten
{"title":"Obstetric Outcomes of Eritrean Immigrants in Switzerland: A Comparative Study","authors":"R. M. Erhardt, Kristen Jafflin, N. Zepro, Charles Abongomera, A. Chernet, Daniel H. Paris, Sonja Merten","doi":"10.3389/ijph.2024.1606745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aims to compare obstetric outcomes between Eritrean and Swiss women in Switzerland, focusing on instrumental or surgical interventions and analgesia use.Methods: The study included data from 45,412 Swiss and 1,132 Eritrean women who gave birth in Swiss hospitals (2019–2022). Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to assess the effect of nationality on mode of delivery and analgesia use and multinomial mixed-effects logistic regression to assess the effect of nationality on mode of delivery in women intended for spontaneous vaginal delivery.Results: Compared with Swiss, Eritrean women had a lower rate of primary C-section (Adj. OR 0.73, 95% CI [0.60, 0.89]) but a higher risk of initially planned vaginal deliveries ending in emergency C-section (RRR 1.31, 95% CI [1.05, 1.63]). Eritrean women were less likely to receive epidural analgesia (Adj. OR 0.53, 95% CI [0.45, 0.62]) and more likely to not receive any analgesia (Adj. OR 1.73, 95% CI [1.52, 1.96]).Conclusion: This study reveals disparities in obstetric care, notably in higher emergency C-section rates and lower analgesia use among Eritrean women. For promoting equitable healthcare practices deeper understanding of obstetrics decision-making is needed.","PeriodicalId":504643,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2024.1606745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to compare obstetric outcomes between Eritrean and Swiss women in Switzerland, focusing on instrumental or surgical interventions and analgesia use.Methods: The study included data from 45,412 Swiss and 1,132 Eritrean women who gave birth in Swiss hospitals (2019–2022). Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to assess the effect of nationality on mode of delivery and analgesia use and multinomial mixed-effects logistic regression to assess the effect of nationality on mode of delivery in women intended for spontaneous vaginal delivery.Results: Compared with Swiss, Eritrean women had a lower rate of primary C-section (Adj. OR 0.73, 95% CI [0.60, 0.89]) but a higher risk of initially planned vaginal deliveries ending in emergency C-section (RRR 1.31, 95% CI [1.05, 1.63]). Eritrean women were less likely to receive epidural analgesia (Adj. OR 0.53, 95% CI [0.45, 0.62]) and more likely to not receive any analgesia (Adj. OR 1.73, 95% CI [1.52, 1.96]).Conclusion: This study reveals disparities in obstetric care, notably in higher emergency C-section rates and lower analgesia use among Eritrean women. For promoting equitable healthcare practices deeper understanding of obstetrics decision-making is needed.
目的:本研究旨在比较瑞士和厄立特里亚妇女的产科结果:本研究旨在比较瑞士境内厄立特里亚妇女和瑞士妇女的产科结果,重点关注器械或手术干预以及镇痛的使用情况:研究纳入了在瑞士医院分娩的 45,412 名瑞士妇女和 1,132 名厄立特里亚妇女的数据(2019-2022 年)。采用混合效应逻辑回归评估国籍对分娩方式和镇痛使用的影响,采用多项式混合效应逻辑回归评估国籍对阴道自然分娩产妇分娩方式的影响:与瑞士产妇相比,厄立特里亚产妇的初次剖腹产率较低(Adj. OR 0.73,95% CI [0.60,0.89]),但最初计划的阴道分娩最终导致紧急剖腹产的风险较高(RRR 1.31,95% CI [1.05,1.63])。厄立特里亚产妇接受硬膜外镇痛的可能性较低(Adj. OR 0.53, 95% CI [0.45, 0.62]),而不接受任何镇痛的可能性较高(Adj. OR 1.73, 95% CI [1.52, 1.96]):这项研究揭示了产科护理方面的差异,尤其是厄立特里亚妇女的紧急剖腹产率较高,镇痛使用率较低。为了促进公平的医疗保健实践,需要加深对产科决策的理解。