Hesychasm and Psychedelics: Altered States, Purgation, and the Question of Authentic Mysticism

Thomas Cattoi
{"title":"Hesychasm and Psychedelics: Altered States, Purgation, and the Question of Authentic Mysticism","authors":"Thomas Cattoi","doi":"10.57010/xfhv8374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this essay is to introduce the reader to the tradition of Hesychasm—a form of monastic asceticism rooted in the tradition of the Desert Fathers and given a systematic articulation by the Byzantine author Gregory Palamas (1296–1359)—and to consider how the mystical experiences described in Palamas’s Triads compare to the altered states at the center of contemporary psychedelic research. After reviewing the chief claims of the hesychastic tradition about the nature and purpose of ascetic practice, the essay will consider the methodological challenges psychedelic researchers face when assessing experiences induced by psychedelic substances. The last section will turn to the discipline of Comparative Theology as a helpful framework to bring into dialogue the hesychastic understanding of deification as a trajectory grounded in the reception of the sacraments and the therapeutic impact of psychedelic experiences. The essay will uncover different points of contact between hesychastic and psychedelic experience but will also foreground a number of irreducible differences between the two, reflecting the specific anthropological and soteriological claims of the hesychastic tradition. The conclusion will advocate for greater epistemic modesty—warning from overhasty identification of mystical states and psychedelic experiences—but also invite theologians and psychedelic researchers to greater reciprocal openness to each other’s insights.","PeriodicalId":438818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemplative Studies","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemplative Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57010/xfhv8374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to introduce the reader to the tradition of Hesychasm—a form of monastic asceticism rooted in the tradition of the Desert Fathers and given a systematic articulation by the Byzantine author Gregory Palamas (1296–1359)—and to consider how the mystical experiences described in Palamas’s Triads compare to the altered states at the center of contemporary psychedelic research. After reviewing the chief claims of the hesychastic tradition about the nature and purpose of ascetic practice, the essay will consider the methodological challenges psychedelic researchers face when assessing experiences induced by psychedelic substances. The last section will turn to the discipline of Comparative Theology as a helpful framework to bring into dialogue the hesychastic understanding of deification as a trajectory grounded in the reception of the sacraments and the therapeutic impact of psychedelic experiences. The essay will uncover different points of contact between hesychastic and psychedelic experience but will also foreground a number of irreducible differences between the two, reflecting the specific anthropological and soteriological claims of the hesychastic tradition. The conclusion will advocate for greater epistemic modesty—warning from overhasty identification of mystical states and psychedelic experiences—but also invite theologians and psychedelic researchers to greater reciprocal openness to each other’s insights.
神秘主义与迷幻药:改变状态、炼狱和真正的神秘主义问题
本文旨在向读者介绍 "神修"(Hesychasm)传统--一种植根于荒漠教父传统的修道院禁欲主义形式,拜占庭作家格雷戈里-帕拉马斯(Gregory Palamas,1296-1359 年)对其进行了系统阐述--并思考帕拉马斯的《三部曲》中描述的神秘体验与当代迷幻药研究中心的改变状态相比有何不同。在回顾了精神病学传统关于苦行的性质和目的的主要主张之后,文章将考虑迷幻药研究人员在评估迷幻药诱发的体验时所面临的方法论挑战。最后一部分将转向比较神学学科,将其作为一个有用的框架,使心理学对神化的理解与迷幻药体验的治疗效果进行对话,神化是一种以接受圣礼为基础的轨迹。这篇文章将揭示出精神疗法与迷幻体验之间不同的接触点,但也将强调两者之间一些不可还原的差异,反映出精神疗法传统特定的人类学与神学主张。文章的结论将提倡在认识论上更加谦虚--警告不要过分草率地认定神秘状态和迷幻体验--但同时也邀请神学家和迷幻研究者对彼此的见解持更加对等开放的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信