Transboundary COVID-19 response on health communication in Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe

Mark Nyandoro, T. Mduluza, Lucy Nyandoro
{"title":"Transboundary COVID-19 response on health communication in Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe","authors":"Mark Nyandoro, T. Mduluza, Lucy Nyandoro","doi":"10.4102/td.v20i1.1394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A global COVID-19 pandemic caused untold community disruptions, a huge toll on lives and placed major burdens on the economies of developing countries. It spread worldwide within a short period of time before nations could mobilise evidence for the best responses. Communities in Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe were heavily disrupted. This article focuses on exploring the transboundary differences in COVID-19 responses, plus the implications for improving the health communication strategies in a pandemic age. Health practitioners and governments were ill-prepared to inform the general public about the pandemic and enforced complete shutdowns of economic and social activities. With the COVID-19 pandemic ravaging communities, there was a dearth of focused health communication on COVID-19’s end. New tools of communication and dissemination of information were embraced in the southern Africa country-specific cases. For example, content on precautionary lifestyles, individual or personal responsibility and utilisation of community health workers in the pandemic era was prioritised to prevent or minimise infections and avoid recurrence of the disease. New communication methods were important for addressing uncertainty and can be applied for any future pandemic. This health communication topic addresses the neglected, but important gap on the efficacy of processes towards better health communication strategies. The transdisciplinary methods include improved health communication strategies informed by the experiences of three Southern African Development Community countries. While such measures to arrest COVID-19 proved plausible, these countries’ projections for the future are a concern, suggesting an urgent need to enhance and strengthen health communication in southern Africa.Transdisciplinary contribution: This is a transdisciplinary exploration of health communication and its implications for COVID-19 and future pandemic responses in Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe.","PeriodicalId":501100,"journal":{"name":"The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v20i1.1394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A global COVID-19 pandemic caused untold community disruptions, a huge toll on lives and placed major burdens on the economies of developing countries. It spread worldwide within a short period of time before nations could mobilise evidence for the best responses. Communities in Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe were heavily disrupted. This article focuses on exploring the transboundary differences in COVID-19 responses, plus the implications for improving the health communication strategies in a pandemic age. Health practitioners and governments were ill-prepared to inform the general public about the pandemic and enforced complete shutdowns of economic and social activities. With the COVID-19 pandemic ravaging communities, there was a dearth of focused health communication on COVID-19’s end. New tools of communication and dissemination of information were embraced in the southern Africa country-specific cases. For example, content on precautionary lifestyles, individual or personal responsibility and utilisation of community health workers in the pandemic era was prioritised to prevent or minimise infections and avoid recurrence of the disease. New communication methods were important for addressing uncertainty and can be applied for any future pandemic. This health communication topic addresses the neglected, but important gap on the efficacy of processes towards better health communication strategies. The transdisciplinary methods include improved health communication strategies informed by the experiences of three Southern African Development Community countries. While such measures to arrest COVID-19 proved plausible, these countries’ projections for the future are a concern, suggesting an urgent need to enhance and strengthen health communication in southern Africa.Transdisciplinary contribution: This is a transdisciplinary exploration of health communication and its implications for COVID-19 and future pandemic responses in Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe.
博茨瓦纳、南非和津巴布韦跨境 COVID-19 保健传播对策
COVID-19 大流行病在全球范围内造成了难以计数的社区混乱、巨大的生命损失,并给发展中国家的经济带来了沉重负担。在各国能够调动证据采取最佳应对措施之前,它就在短时间内蔓延到了世界各地。博茨瓦纳、南非和津巴布韦的社区受到严重破坏。本文重点探讨了 COVID-19 应对措施的跨境差异,以及在大流行病时代改进健康传播策略的意义。卫生工作者和政府在向公众通报大流行病信息方面准备不足,并强制要求全面停止经济和社会活动。在 COVID-19 大流行肆虐社区的情况下,COVID-19 方面缺乏有针对性的健康传播。在南部非洲国家的具体案例中,采用了新的沟通和信息传播工具。例如,关于预防性生活方式、个人或个人责任以及在大流行时期利用社区卫生工作者的内容被列为优先事项,以预防或尽量减少感染,避免疾病复发。新的传播方法对于解决不确定性非常重要,可用于未来的任何大流行病。这一健康传播主题针对的是被忽视但却重要的差距,即实现更好的健康传播战略过程的有效性。跨学科方法包括根据南部非洲发展共同体三个国家的经验改进健康传播战略。虽然这些遏制 COVID-19 的措施证明是可行的,但这些国家对未来的预测令人担忧,这表明迫切需要在南部非洲加强健康传播:这是对博茨瓦纳、南非和津巴布韦的健康传播及其对 COVID-19 和未来流行病应对措施的影响的跨学科探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信