Beyond borders: Examining the role of national learned societies in the social sciences and humanities

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Elina Late, Raf Guns, Janne Pölönen, Jadranka Stojanovski, Mimi Urbanc, Michael Ochsner
{"title":"Beyond borders: Examining the role of national learned societies in the social sciences and humanities","authors":"Elina Late,&nbsp;Raf Guns,&nbsp;Janne Pölönen,&nbsp;Jadranka Stojanovski,&nbsp;Mimi Urbanc,&nbsp;Michael Ochsner","doi":"10.1002/leap.1609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this paper is to examine the status of national learned societies in social sciences and humanities (SSH) in Europe. Previous research shows that learned societies serve diverse roles in higher education and suggests that national societies come under pressure given different developments, such as internationalization or open science adoption. We investigate a comprehensive range of aspects within national learned societies: primary goals, activities, internationalization, organization, funding, membership, and recent changes, addressing potential pressures arising from them. Using a cross-national survey involving 194 learned societies across eight European countries, we study: (a) do the previous findings from individual countries or small selections of national societies hold for a broad range of learned societies in SSH across Europe, and (b) are national learned societies coming under pressure due to internationalization and commercialization processes? Our findings confirm previous results from single countries and single disciplines and expand them as our results show that national learned societies in SSH play an important role in Europe in promoting multilingualism in science, collaborating with many stakeholders, and fostering interdisciplinarity. Contrary to previous research, most SSH societies in our study have not undergone significant changes in the past 5 years, challenging expectations of their declining role.</p>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1609","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1609","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine the status of national learned societies in social sciences and humanities (SSH) in Europe. Previous research shows that learned societies serve diverse roles in higher education and suggests that national societies come under pressure given different developments, such as internationalization or open science adoption. We investigate a comprehensive range of aspects within national learned societies: primary goals, activities, internationalization, organization, funding, membership, and recent changes, addressing potential pressures arising from them. Using a cross-national survey involving 194 learned societies across eight European countries, we study: (a) do the previous findings from individual countries or small selections of national societies hold for a broad range of learned societies in SSH across Europe, and (b) are national learned societies coming under pressure due to internationalization and commercialization processes? Our findings confirm previous results from single countries and single disciplines and expand them as our results show that national learned societies in SSH play an important role in Europe in promoting multilingualism in science, collaborating with many stakeholders, and fostering interdisciplinarity. Contrary to previous research, most SSH societies in our study have not undergone significant changes in the past 5 years, challenging expectations of their declining role.

Abstract Image

超越国界:考察各国学会在社会科学及人文科学领域的作用
本文旨在研究欧洲社会科学及人文科学(SSH)领域国家学会的现状。以往的研究表明,学会在高等教育中发挥着不同的作用,并表明国家学会在不同的发展中面临压力,如国际化或采用开放科学。我们对各国学会的各个方面进行了全面调查:主要目标、活动、国际化、组织、资金、会员以及最近的变化,并探讨了由此产生的潜在压力。通过一项涉及 8 个欧洲国家 194 个学会的跨国调查,我们研究了:(a) 以前从单个国家或小部分国家学会得出的结论是否适用于欧洲 SSH 领域的广泛学会;(b) 国家学会是否因国际化和商业化进程而面临压力?我们的研究结果证实了以前从单一国家和单一学科得出的结果,并扩展了这些结果,因为我们的研究结果表明,在欧洲,科学、人文科学和社会科学领域的全国性学会在促进科学领域的多语言化、与众多利益相关者合作以及促进跨学科性方面发挥着重要作用。与以往的研究相反,在我们的研究中,大多数社会科学及人文科学学会在过去 5 年中没有发生重大变化,这挑战了人们对其作用下降的预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learned Publishing
Learned Publishing INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.90%
发文量
72
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信