-wave-based exploration of sensitive EEG features and classification of situation awareness

C. Feng, S. Liu, X. Wanyan, Y. Dang, Z. Wang, C. Qian
{"title":"-wave-based exploration of sensitive EEG features and classification of situation awareness","authors":"C. Feng, S. Liu, X. Wanyan, Y. Dang, Z. Wang, C. Qian","doi":"10.1017/aer.2024.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The purpose of this study was to explore the electroencephalogram (EEG) features sensitive to situation awareness (SA) and then classify SA levels. Forty-eight participants were recruited to complete an SA standard test based on the multi-attribute task battery (MATB) II, and the corresponding EEG data and situation awareness global assessment technology (SAGAT) scores were recorded. The population with the top 25% of SAGAT scores was selected as the high-SA level (HSL) group, and the bottom 25% was the low-SA level (LSL) group. The results showed that (1) for the relative power of \n \n \n \n$\\beta$\n\n \n 1 (16–20Hz), \n \n \n \n$\\beta$\n\n \n 2 (20–24Hz) and \n \n \n \n$\\beta$\n\n \n 3 (24–30Hz), repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) in three brain regions (Central Central-Parietal, and Parietal) × three brain lateralities (left, midline, and right) × two SA groups (HSL and LSL) showed a significant main effect for SA groups; post hoc comparisons revealed that compared with LSL, the above features of HSL were higher. (2) for most ratio features associated with \n \n \n \n$\\beta$\n\n \n 1 ∼ \n \n \n \n$\\beta$\n\n \n 3, ANOVA also revealed a main effect for SA groups. (3) EEG features sensitive to SA were selected to classify SA levels with small-sample data based on the general supervised machine learning classifiers. Five-fold cross-validation results showed that among the models with easy interpretability, logistic regression (LR) and decision tree (DT) presented the highest accuracy (both 92%), while among the models with hard interpretability, the accuracy of random forest (RF) was 88.8%, followed by an artificial neural network (ANN) of 84%. The above results suggested that (1) the relative power of \n \n \n \n$\\beta$\n\n \n 1 ∼ \n \n \n \n$\\beta$\n\n \n 3 and their associated ratios were sensitive to changes in SA levels; (2) the general supervised machine learning models all exhibited good accuracy (greater than 75%); and (3) furthermore, LR and DT are recommended by combining the interpretability and accuracy of the models.","PeriodicalId":508971,"journal":{"name":"The Aeronautical Journal","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Aeronautical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2024.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the electroencephalogram (EEG) features sensitive to situation awareness (SA) and then classify SA levels. Forty-eight participants were recruited to complete an SA standard test based on the multi-attribute task battery (MATB) II, and the corresponding EEG data and situation awareness global assessment technology (SAGAT) scores were recorded. The population with the top 25% of SAGAT scores was selected as the high-SA level (HSL) group, and the bottom 25% was the low-SA level (LSL) group. The results showed that (1) for the relative power of $\beta$ 1 (16–20Hz), $\beta$ 2 (20–24Hz) and $\beta$ 3 (24–30Hz), repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) in three brain regions (Central Central-Parietal, and Parietal) × three brain lateralities (left, midline, and right) × two SA groups (HSL and LSL) showed a significant main effect for SA groups; post hoc comparisons revealed that compared with LSL, the above features of HSL were higher. (2) for most ratio features associated with $\beta$ 1 ∼ $\beta$ 3, ANOVA also revealed a main effect for SA groups. (3) EEG features sensitive to SA were selected to classify SA levels with small-sample data based on the general supervised machine learning classifiers. Five-fold cross-validation results showed that among the models with easy interpretability, logistic regression (LR) and decision tree (DT) presented the highest accuracy (both 92%), while among the models with hard interpretability, the accuracy of random forest (RF) was 88.8%, followed by an artificial neural network (ANN) of 84%. The above results suggested that (1) the relative power of $\beta$ 1 ∼ $\beta$ 3 and their associated ratios were sensitive to changes in SA levels; (2) the general supervised machine learning models all exhibited good accuracy (greater than 75%); and (3) furthermore, LR and DT are recommended by combining the interpretability and accuracy of the models.
-基于波的敏感脑电图特征探索和情境意识分类
本研究旨在探索对情境意识(SA)敏感的脑电图(EEG)特征,然后对SA水平进行分类。研究人员招募了 48 名参与者,完成了基于多属性任务电池(MATB)II 的 SA 标准测试,并记录了相应的脑电图数据和情境意识全球评估技术(SAGAT)得分。SAGAT 分数排名前 25% 的人群被选为高 SA 水平(HSL)组,排名后 25% 的人群被选为低 SA 水平(LSL)组。结果表明:(1)对于$\beta$1(16-20Hz)、$\beta$2(20-24Hz)和$\beta$3(24-30Hz)的相对功率,在三个脑区(中央-顶叶和顶叶)×三个脑侧线(左侧、中线和右侧)×两个SA组(HSL和LSL)的重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)显示,SA组的主效应显著;事后比较显示,与LSL相比,HSL的上述特征更高。(2)对于与 1 ∼ 3 美元贝塔相关的大多数比率特征,方差分析也显示出 SA 组的主效应。(3) 基于一般监督机器学习分类器,选择对 SA 敏感的脑电特征,用小样本数据对 SA 水平进行分类。五倍交叉验证结果显示,在易解释性模型中,逻辑回归(LR)和决策树(DT)的准确率最高(均为 92%),而在难解释性模型中,随机森林(RF)的准确率为 88.8%,其次是人工神经网络(ANN),准确率为 84%。上述结果表明:(1)$\beta$ 1 ∼ $\beta$ 3 的相对功率及其相关比率对 SA 水平的变化很敏感;(2)一般监督机器学习模型都表现出良好的准确性(大于 75%);(3)此外,综合模型的可解释性和准确性,推荐使用 LR 和 DT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信