DOMPERIDONE VS METOCLOPRAMIDE: COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICACY IN TREATING DIABETIC GASTROPARESIS

A. Nawaz, S. Shah, A. Ahmed, M. Ullah
{"title":"DOMPERIDONE VS METOCLOPRAMIDE: COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICACY IN TREATING DIABETIC GASTROPARESIS","authors":"A. Nawaz, S. Shah, A. Ahmed, M. Ullah","doi":"10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diabetic gastroparesis, a common complication of diabetes mellitus, presents a challenging clinical scenario characterised by delayed gastric emptying and symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and bloating. Objectives: The primary aim of the study is to compare domperidone vs metoclopramide to evaluate their efficacy in treating diabetic gastroparesis. Methods: This comparative study was conducted in DHQ Hospital Nowshera Khyber Pakhtunkhwa—from June 2022 to June 2023. Data was collected from 190 patients from both genders. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria are randomised into Group A (Domperidone) and Group B (Metoclopramide).  The severity of gastroparesis symptoms is assessed using validated symptom-scoring tools before treatment initiation and at regular intervals throughout the study. Results: Data was collected from 190 patients suffering from DM. The mean age of the patients in group A was 52.4 ± 8.2 years and in group B, 53.1 ± 7.5 years. There were 105 female and 185 male patients. The mean duration of DM is 12.3 ± 4.1 years and 11.8 ± 3.8 years in groups A and B, respectively. Group A (Domperidone) and Group B (Metoclopramide) demonstrated significant improvement in symptom scores from baseline to the final assessment. Group A exhibited a substantial reduction in symptom score from 18.2 ± 4.5 at baseline to 8.7 ± 3.2 at the end of the study (p < 0.001), while Group B showed a decrease from 17.9 ± 4.3 to 9.5 ± 3.8 (p < 0.001). Moreover, both groups experienced notable reductions in gastric emptying time. Conclusion: It is concluded that both domperidone and metoclopramide are effective in managing diabetic gastroparesis, with nuances in their safety profiles.","PeriodicalId":504575,"journal":{"name":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","volume":" 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetic gastroparesis, a common complication of diabetes mellitus, presents a challenging clinical scenario characterised by delayed gastric emptying and symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and bloating. Objectives: The primary aim of the study is to compare domperidone vs metoclopramide to evaluate their efficacy in treating diabetic gastroparesis. Methods: This comparative study was conducted in DHQ Hospital Nowshera Khyber Pakhtunkhwa—from June 2022 to June 2023. Data was collected from 190 patients from both genders. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria are randomised into Group A (Domperidone) and Group B (Metoclopramide).  The severity of gastroparesis symptoms is assessed using validated symptom-scoring tools before treatment initiation and at regular intervals throughout the study. Results: Data was collected from 190 patients suffering from DM. The mean age of the patients in group A was 52.4 ± 8.2 years and in group B, 53.1 ± 7.5 years. There were 105 female and 185 male patients. The mean duration of DM is 12.3 ± 4.1 years and 11.8 ± 3.8 years in groups A and B, respectively. Group A (Domperidone) and Group B (Metoclopramide) demonstrated significant improvement in symptom scores from baseline to the final assessment. Group A exhibited a substantial reduction in symptom score from 18.2 ± 4.5 at baseline to 8.7 ± 3.2 at the end of the study (p < 0.001), while Group B showed a decrease from 17.9 ± 4.3 to 9.5 ± 3.8 (p < 0.001). Moreover, both groups experienced notable reductions in gastric emptying time. Conclusion: It is concluded that both domperidone and metoclopramide are effective in managing diabetic gastroparesis, with nuances in their safety profiles.
多潘立酮与甲氧氯普胺:治疗糖尿病胃轻瘫疗效的比较评估
糖尿病胃轻瘫是糖尿病的一种常见并发症,以胃排空延迟和恶心、呕吐、腹痛、腹胀等症状为特征,是一种极具挑战性的临床表现。研究目的本研究的主要目的是比较多潘立酮和甲氧氯普胺,以评估它们治疗糖尿病胃轻瘫的疗效。研究方法这项比较研究于 2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 6 月在开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省诺谢拉 DHQ 医院进行。收集了 190 名男女患者的数据。符合纳入标准的患者被随机分为 A 组(多潘立酮)和 B 组(甲氧氯普胺)。 在开始治疗前和整个研究期间,使用经过验证的症状评分工具对胃痉挛症状的严重程度进行评估。研究结果收集了 190 名糖尿病患者的数据。A 组患者的平均年龄为(52.4±8.2)岁,B 组患者的平均年龄为(53.1±7.5)岁。其中女性患者 105 人,男性患者 185 人。A 组和 B 组糖尿病的平均病程分别为(12.3 ± 4.1)年和(11.8 ± 3.8)年。从基线到最终评估,A 组(多潘立酮)和 B 组(甲氧氯普胺)的症状评分均有显著改善。A 组的症状评分从基线时的 18.2 ± 4.5 分大幅降至研究结束时的 8.7 ± 3.2 分(p < 0.001),而 B 组则从 17.9 ± 4.3 分降至 9.5 ± 3.8 分(p < 0.001)。此外,两组的胃排空时间都显著缩短。结论结论:多潘立酮和甲氧氯普胺都能有效治疗糖尿病胃瘫,但两者的安全性存在细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信