Towards Nostalgic Reading of Children’s Literature in Academic Teaching

Monika Kupiec
{"title":"Towards Nostalgic Reading of Children’s Literature in Academic Teaching","authors":"Monika Kupiec","doi":"10.17951/lrp.2024.43.1.161-175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The need to recognize the student’s way of reading children’s reading is related to planning the development in the course of academic education of important methodological skills of the future teacher of early education (selection of literary texts, organization of work with the text). Every early childhood teacher is a nostalgic go-between for children’s literature. Research Aim: The aim of my own research is to identify students’ opinions about selected texts of children’s literature. Particular attention was paid to identifying revealed reading strategies. Method: The method of personal documents was used. The impulse that triggered students’ reflection on their own opinion about a children’s book was writing a review of a selected reading. Results: 41 student statements were collected. Among the reviewed items, the vast majority (in 31 reviews) were literature considered classic, which has been included in the recommendations of the core curriculum for years. The analysis shows that 14 people read the reviewed books in childhood and declared that they read them again in their adult life. The analysis of students’ choices reveals a lack of knowledge of children’s books published after 2006, i.e. during their early education. The most frequently activated strategy of receiving children’s literature – regardless of the baggage of experience related to reading a given book in childhood – is infantilizing reading. Conclusion: Without identifying the strategy of reading children’s literature, future teachers will not be able to participate competently in the child’s literary communication, even with personal “reading”. Intensifying the critical reading of children’s literature in academic classes for future teachers of early childhood education seems to be a good way to collect reading experiences and prepare for the role of a mediator of reading. Critical reading activities can be intensified in the activities of circles, laboratories and children’s book discussion clubs for future teachers of early childhood education.","PeriodicalId":258263,"journal":{"name":"Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2024.43.1.161-175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The need to recognize the student’s way of reading children’s reading is related to planning the development in the course of academic education of important methodological skills of the future teacher of early education (selection of literary texts, organization of work with the text). Every early childhood teacher is a nostalgic go-between for children’s literature. Research Aim: The aim of my own research is to identify students’ opinions about selected texts of children’s literature. Particular attention was paid to identifying revealed reading strategies. Method: The method of personal documents was used. The impulse that triggered students’ reflection on their own opinion about a children’s book was writing a review of a selected reading. Results: 41 student statements were collected. Among the reviewed items, the vast majority (in 31 reviews) were literature considered classic, which has been included in the recommendations of the core curriculum for years. The analysis shows that 14 people read the reviewed books in childhood and declared that they read them again in their adult life. The analysis of students’ choices reveals a lack of knowledge of children’s books published after 2006, i.e. during their early education. The most frequently activated strategy of receiving children’s literature – regardless of the baggage of experience related to reading a given book in childhood – is infantilizing reading. Conclusion: Without identifying the strategy of reading children’s literature, future teachers will not be able to participate competently in the child’s literary communication, even with personal “reading”. Intensifying the critical reading of children’s literature in academic classes for future teachers of early childhood education seems to be a good way to collect reading experiences and prepare for the role of a mediator of reading. Critical reading activities can be intensified in the activities of circles, laboratories and children’s book discussion clubs for future teachers of early childhood education.
走向学术教学中的儿童文学怀旧阅读
引言认识到学生阅读儿童读物的方式的必要性,关系到在学术教育过程中规划未来幼儿教 师重要方法技能(文学文本的选择、文本工作的组织)的发展。每一位幼儿教师都是儿童文学的怀旧者。研究目的:我自己的研究目的是确定学生对儿童文学选文的看法。特别注意确定所揭示的阅读策略。研究方法:采用个人文献法。引发学生反思自己对儿童读物看法的冲动是撰写一篇选读评论。结果共收集了 41 份学生发言。在评论的书目中,绝大多数(31 篇评论)是被视为经典的文学作品,多年来一直被列入核心课程的推荐书目。分析表明,有 14 人在童年时读过所评论的书籍,并声明在成年后再次阅读。对学生选择的分析表明,他们对 2006 年以后出版的儿童读物缺乏了解,即在早期教 育阶段。接受儿童文学作品最常用的策略--无论童年阅读某本书的经验包袱如何--是将阅读幼稚化。结论如果不明确儿童文学阅读的策略,未来的教师将无法胜任地参与儿童的文学交流,即使是个人 "阅读"。在未来幼儿教育教师的学科课程中加强对儿童文学的批判性阅读,似乎是收集阅读经验、为扮演阅读中介角色做好准备的好方法。可以在未来幼儿教育教师的圈子、实验室和儿童读物讨论俱乐部活动中加强批判性阅读活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信