The impact of public health efficiency on well-being in Italian provinces

IF 1.9 Q2 ECONOMICS
Rostand Arland Yebetchou Tchounkeu
{"title":"The impact of public health efficiency on well-being in Italian provinces","authors":"Rostand Arland Yebetchou Tchounkeu","doi":"10.1108/jes-06-2023-0306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis work aims to analyse the relationship between public health efficiency and well-being considering a panel of 102 Italian provinces from 2000 to 2016 and evaluates if there are omitted variable biases and endogeneity biases and also evaluates if there are heterogeneous effects among provinces with different income levels.Design/methodology/approachWe use a multi-input and output bootstrap data envelopment analysis to assess public health efficiency. Then, we measure well-being indices using the min-max linear scaling transformation technique. A two-stage least squares model is used to identify the causal effect of improving public health efficiency on well-being to account for time-invariant heterogeneity, omitted variable bias and endogeneity bias.FindingsAfter controlling for important economic factors, the results show a significant effect of an accountable and efficient public health system on well-being. Those effects are concentrated in the North, the most economically, geographically and environmentally advantageous areas.Research limitations/implicationsThe use of the sample mean, probably the oldest and most used method for aggregating the indicators, could be affected by variable compensation, with consequent misleading results in the process of constructing the well-being index. Another limitation is the use of lagged values of the main predictor as an instrument in the instrumental variables setting because it could lead to information loss. Finally, the availability of data over a long period of time.Practical implicationsThe findings could help policymakers adopt measures to strengthen the public health system, encourage private providers and inspire countries worldwide.Social implicationsThese results draw the attention of local authorities, who play an important role in designing and implementing policies to stimulate local public health efficiency, which puts individuals in the conditions of achieving overall well-being in their communities.Originality/valueFor the first time in Italy, a panel of well-being indices was constructed by developing new methodologies based on microeconomic theory. Furthermore, for the first time, the assessment of the relationship between public health efficiency and well-being is carried out using a panel of 102 Italian provinces.","PeriodicalId":47604,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-06-2023-0306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis work aims to analyse the relationship between public health efficiency and well-being considering a panel of 102 Italian provinces from 2000 to 2016 and evaluates if there are omitted variable biases and endogeneity biases and also evaluates if there are heterogeneous effects among provinces with different income levels.Design/methodology/approachWe use a multi-input and output bootstrap data envelopment analysis to assess public health efficiency. Then, we measure well-being indices using the min-max linear scaling transformation technique. A two-stage least squares model is used to identify the causal effect of improving public health efficiency on well-being to account for time-invariant heterogeneity, omitted variable bias and endogeneity bias.FindingsAfter controlling for important economic factors, the results show a significant effect of an accountable and efficient public health system on well-being. Those effects are concentrated in the North, the most economically, geographically and environmentally advantageous areas.Research limitations/implicationsThe use of the sample mean, probably the oldest and most used method for aggregating the indicators, could be affected by variable compensation, with consequent misleading results in the process of constructing the well-being index. Another limitation is the use of lagged values of the main predictor as an instrument in the instrumental variables setting because it could lead to information loss. Finally, the availability of data over a long period of time.Practical implicationsThe findings could help policymakers adopt measures to strengthen the public health system, encourage private providers and inspire countries worldwide.Social implicationsThese results draw the attention of local authorities, who play an important role in designing and implementing policies to stimulate local public health efficiency, which puts individuals in the conditions of achieving overall well-being in their communities.Originality/valueFor the first time in Italy, a panel of well-being indices was constructed by developing new methodologies based on microeconomic theory. Furthermore, for the first time, the assessment of the relationship between public health efficiency and well-being is carried out using a panel of 102 Italian provinces.
意大利各省公共卫生效率对福祉的影响
目的本研究以 2000 年至 2016 年的 102 个意大利省份为研究对象,分析公共卫生效率与福祉之间的关系,评估是否存在遗漏变量偏差和内生性偏差,并评估不同收入水平的省份之间是否存在异质性影响。然后,我们使用最小-最大线性比例转换技术来衡量福利指数。我们使用两阶段最小二乘法模型来确定提高公共卫生效率对幸福感的因果效应,以考虑时变异质性、遗漏变量偏差和内生性偏差。这些影响主要集中在北部地区,即经济、地理和环境条件最优越的地区。研究局限性/意义样本平均值的使用可能是最古老、最常用的指标汇总方法,可能会受到变量补偿的影响,从而在构建幸福指数的过程中产生误导性结果。另一个限制因素是在工具变量设置中使用主要预测因子的滞后值作为工具,因为这可能导致信息丢失。社会影响这些结果引起了地方当局的注意,他们在设计和实施提高地方公共卫生效率的政策方面发挥着重要作用,这将使个人在其社区内实现整体福祉。原创性/价值在意大利,通过开发基于微观经济理论的新方法,首次构建了福祉指数面板。此外,还首次使用意大利 102 个省的面板对公共卫生效率与福祉之间的关系进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Studies publishes high quality research findings and commentary on international developments in economics. The journal maintains a sound balance between economic theory and application at both the micro and the macro levels. Articles on economic issues between individual nations, emerging and evolving trading blocs are particularly welcomed. Contributors are encouraged to spell out the practical implications of their work for economists in government and industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信