Development and content validity of the DizzyQuest

E. Martin, L. E. G. H. de Joode, F. Lucieer, D. Sitters, P. Delespaul, C. Leue, S. C. F. van de Weijer, A. Meijers-Erdkamp, E. Grill, A. Zwergal, N. Guinand, A. Perez-Fornos, V. van Rompaey, J. Widdershoven, M. L. Kimman, R. van de Berg
{"title":"Development and content validity of the DizzyQuest","authors":"E. Martin, L. E. G. H. de Joode, F. Lucieer, D. Sitters, P. Delespaul, C. Leue, S. C. F. van de Weijer, A. Meijers-Erdkamp, E. Grill, A. Zwergal, N. Guinand, A. Perez-Fornos, V. van Rompaey, J. Widdershoven, M. L. Kimman, R. van de Berg","doi":"10.3389/fauot.2024.1378569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vestibular disorders have a high prevalence and impact on general health. Currently questionnaires to measure vestibular symptoms and the impact on daily life, do not capture disease-specific symptoms or induce recall bias. The DizzyQuest was introduced, to measure vestibular symptoms in the flow of daily life, using the ecological momentary assessment (EMA) strategy. The development and content validity of the DizzyQuest are described in this article.The development process consisted of two stages: First, the development of a concept version of the DizzyQuest based on the conceptual model of positive health, semi-structured interviews with patients diagnosed with bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) and expert input. Second, the assessment of content validity through a 4-week pilot trial, followed by focus group meetings with patients and professionals separately.Patient interviews, an expert meeting and a conceptual model resulted in the first pilot version of the DizzyQuest, which included a morning-, within-day-, evening- and attack-questionnaire. To report patient characteristics, complimentary patient- and doctor-questionnaires were added. The pilot trial (N = 5) and two patient focus group meetings resulted in multiple suggestions for response options. Two professional focus group meetings provided recommendations for sampling time and sampling schedule. As a result, two versions of the DizzyQuest were developed, consisting of a regular DizzyQuest (DQ) and an extended DizzyQuest-XL (DQ-XL).The DizzyQuest enables the administration of multiple questionnaires during the flow of daily life, therefore increasing reliability and ecological validity. The DQ and DQ-XL, using a big data approach, has the potential to improve precision medicine.","PeriodicalId":404946,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Audiology and Otology","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Audiology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fauot.2024.1378569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vestibular disorders have a high prevalence and impact on general health. Currently questionnaires to measure vestibular symptoms and the impact on daily life, do not capture disease-specific symptoms or induce recall bias. The DizzyQuest was introduced, to measure vestibular symptoms in the flow of daily life, using the ecological momentary assessment (EMA) strategy. The development and content validity of the DizzyQuest are described in this article.The development process consisted of two stages: First, the development of a concept version of the DizzyQuest based on the conceptual model of positive health, semi-structured interviews with patients diagnosed with bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) and expert input. Second, the assessment of content validity through a 4-week pilot trial, followed by focus group meetings with patients and professionals separately.Patient interviews, an expert meeting and a conceptual model resulted in the first pilot version of the DizzyQuest, which included a morning-, within-day-, evening- and attack-questionnaire. To report patient characteristics, complimentary patient- and doctor-questionnaires were added. The pilot trial (N = 5) and two patient focus group meetings resulted in multiple suggestions for response options. Two professional focus group meetings provided recommendations for sampling time and sampling schedule. As a result, two versions of the DizzyQuest were developed, consisting of a regular DizzyQuest (DQ) and an extended DizzyQuest-XL (DQ-XL).The DizzyQuest enables the administration of multiple questionnaires during the flow of daily life, therefore increasing reliability and ecological validity. The DQ and DQ-XL, using a big data approach, has the potential to improve precision medicine.
DizzyQuest 的开发和内容有效性
前庭失调的发病率很高,对一般健康的影响也很大。目前,用于测量前庭症状及其对日常生活影响的调查问卷并不能捕捉到特定疾病的症状,也不会引起回忆偏差。为了测量日常生活中的前庭症状,我们采用了生态瞬间评估(EMA)策略,推出了 DizzyQuest。本文介绍了 DizzyQuest 的开发和内容效度:首先,根据积极健康概念模型、对诊断为双侧前庭大腺病(BV)患者的半结构式访谈以及专家意见,开发概念版的 DizzyQuest。患者访谈、专家会议和概念模型最终形成了第一个试验版本的 "头晕测验",其中包括晨间问卷、日间问卷、晚间问卷和发作问卷。为了报告患者特征,还增加了患者和医生问卷。试点试验(N = 5)和两次患者焦点小组会议就回答选项提出了多项建议。两次专业焦点小组会议就取样时间和取样计划提出了建议。因此,我们开发了两个版本的 DizzyQuest,包括普通版 DizzyQuest (DQ) 和扩展版 DizzyQuest-XL (DQ-XL)。DQ和DQ-XL采用大数据方法,具有改善精准医疗的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信