{"title":"„The Black Box\" by George Stocking","authors":"Gordana Gorunović","doi":"10.21301/eap.v19i1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three years before his death on July 13, 2013, George William Stocking, widely regarded as the discipline's \"greatest historian of anthropology,\" wrote an autobiography and memoir entitled Glimpses into My Own Black Box: An Exercise in Self-Deconstruction(2010). The book was published as part of the famous History of Anthropology (HOA) edition, which Stocking started at The University of Wisconsin Press (1983) and edited for two decades. This paper is based on the understanding of the American theoretician of autobiography, William Howarth, who posited that autobiography in literary (and scientific) writing is akin to what self-portrait is in painting. In the introductory chapter of the work, biographical data are presented that bring the character and work of George William Stocking closer to the domestic, Serbian readership (his second marriage to the sociologist Carol Bowman; their stays in Yugoslavia). This is followed by a description of the two main phases in Stocking's life and work: the formative period in his intellectual development and the mature age, known as the \"Chicago years\", spent in the Departments of History and Anthropology. Bearing in mind the main elements of the autobiographical strategy – character/self-portrait, technique (rhetoric and writing style), and the theme presented by the author's work-text – Stocking's book thematizes the life story, professional and scientific history (history of anthropology) from the position of both a witness and the one of the creators of written histories of the discipline and biographies of its practitioners and theorists. His writing technique is characterized by self-reflection and scientifically argued discussions on anthropological, historical and political topics and problems. Despite the significant influence his writing and edition of the HOA has had in anthropology, social sciences and humanities, the autobiographer problematizes his relationship to the two disciplines that shaped him as a scientist, highlighting his ambivalent position within them. In spite of the objective indicators of professional success, such as prestigious recognitions, awards, a secure position at the University and the Academy of Arts and Sciences, and a comfortable civic life filled with trips, conferences and guest appearances at important American and British scientific research institutions, the subjective experience of \"double non-belonging\" or rather, liminality, is the leitmotif that colors his self-portrait and the meaning of the text as a whole. The main features of the work, such as its discursive style of narration and description, striving for objectivity and honesty (self-disclosure and „self-deconstruction“), anxiety regarding one's own place, role and importance in science, as well as, at times, a resigned or elegiac tone, especially at the end of the book, i.e. towards the end of his life, provide the basis to include Stocking's strategy in a hybrid type with elements of those two categories that Howarth calls \"rhetorical\" and \"poetic\" confession.","PeriodicalId":515445,"journal":{"name":"Etnoantropološki problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology","volume":" 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etnoantropološki problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v19i1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Three years before his death on July 13, 2013, George William Stocking, widely regarded as the discipline's "greatest historian of anthropology," wrote an autobiography and memoir entitled Glimpses into My Own Black Box: An Exercise in Self-Deconstruction(2010). The book was published as part of the famous History of Anthropology (HOA) edition, which Stocking started at The University of Wisconsin Press (1983) and edited for two decades. This paper is based on the understanding of the American theoretician of autobiography, William Howarth, who posited that autobiography in literary (and scientific) writing is akin to what self-portrait is in painting. In the introductory chapter of the work, biographical data are presented that bring the character and work of George William Stocking closer to the domestic, Serbian readership (his second marriage to the sociologist Carol Bowman; their stays in Yugoslavia). This is followed by a description of the two main phases in Stocking's life and work: the formative period in his intellectual development and the mature age, known as the "Chicago years", spent in the Departments of History and Anthropology. Bearing in mind the main elements of the autobiographical strategy – character/self-portrait, technique (rhetoric and writing style), and the theme presented by the author's work-text – Stocking's book thematizes the life story, professional and scientific history (history of anthropology) from the position of both a witness and the one of the creators of written histories of the discipline and biographies of its practitioners and theorists. His writing technique is characterized by self-reflection and scientifically argued discussions on anthropological, historical and political topics and problems. Despite the significant influence his writing and edition of the HOA has had in anthropology, social sciences and humanities, the autobiographer problematizes his relationship to the two disciplines that shaped him as a scientist, highlighting his ambivalent position within them. In spite of the objective indicators of professional success, such as prestigious recognitions, awards, a secure position at the University and the Academy of Arts and Sciences, and a comfortable civic life filled with trips, conferences and guest appearances at important American and British scientific research institutions, the subjective experience of "double non-belonging" or rather, liminality, is the leitmotif that colors his self-portrait and the meaning of the text as a whole. The main features of the work, such as its discursive style of narration and description, striving for objectivity and honesty (self-disclosure and „self-deconstruction“), anxiety regarding one's own place, role and importance in science, as well as, at times, a resigned or elegiac tone, especially at the end of the book, i.e. towards the end of his life, provide the basis to include Stocking's strategy in a hybrid type with elements of those two categories that Howarth calls "rhetorical" and "poetic" confession.
被公认为人类学学科 "最伟大的历史学家 "的乔治-威廉-斯托金(George William Stocking)在2013年7月13日逝世前三年写了一本自传和回忆录,名为《我自己的黑匣子一瞥》(Glimpses into My Own Black Box:An Exercise in Self-Deconstruction》(2010 年)。该书作为著名的《人类学史》(HOA)版本的一部分出版,斯托金在威斯康星大学出版社(1983 年)创办了这一版本,并编辑了二十年。本文基于美国自传理论家威廉-豪沃斯(William Howarth)的理解,他认为文学(和科学)写作中的自传类似于绘画中的自画像。在作品的引言一章中,介绍了乔治-威廉-斯托金的传记资料,使他的性格和作品更贴近塞尔维亚国内的读者(他与社会学家卡罗尔-鲍曼的第二次婚姻;他们在南斯拉夫的逗留)。接下来是对斯托金生活和工作中两个主要阶段的描述:智力发展的成长期和在历史系和人类学系度过的成熟期,即所谓的 "芝加哥岁月"。考虑到自传策略的主要要素--人物/自画像、技巧(修辞和写作风格)以及作者的作品文本所呈现的主题--斯托金的这本书从见证者和该学科书面历史及其从业者和理论家传记的创作者的立场出发,将人生故事、专业和科学史(人类学史)主题化。他的写作技巧的特点是对人类学、历史和政治话题和问题进行自我反思和科学论证的讨论。尽管他的著作和《人类学》版本对人类学、社会科学和人文学科产生了重大影响,但自传作者将他与这两门塑造他成为科学家的学科的关系问题化,强调了他在这两门学科中的矛盾地位。尽管他在专业上取得了客观上的成功,如获得了著名的表彰和奖项,在大学和艺术与科学院拥有稳固的职位,在美国和英国的重要科研机构旅行、参加会议和客座,过着舒适的公民生活,但 "双重非归属 "的主观体验,或者说边缘性,是他的自画像和整个文本意义的主旋律。作品的主要特点,如叙述和描述的话语风格,追求客观和诚实(自我披露和 "自我解构"),对自己在科学中的地位、作用和重要性的焦虑,以及有时是一种无奈或哀伤的语气,特别是在书的结尾,即在他生命的最后阶段。在此基础上,我们将斯托金的策略与这两种类型的元素混合在一起,豪沃斯称之为 "修辞的 "和 "诗意的 "忏悔。