ConsensusPrime—A Bioinformatic Pipeline for Efficient Consensus Primer Design—Detection of Various Resistance and Virulence Factors in MRSA—A Case Study

Maximillian Collatz, M. Reinicke, Celia Diezel, S. Braun, S. Monecke, Annett Reissig, R. Ehricht
{"title":"ConsensusPrime—A Bioinformatic Pipeline for Efficient Consensus Primer Design—Detection of Various Resistance and Virulence Factors in MRSA—A Case Study","authors":"Maximillian Collatz, M. Reinicke, Celia Diezel, S. Braun, S. Monecke, Annett Reissig, R. Ehricht","doi":"10.3390/biomedinformatics4020068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The effectiveness and reliability of diagnostic tests that detect DNA sequences largely hinge on the quality of the used primers and probes. This importance is especially evident when considering the specific sample being analyzed, as it affects the molecular background and potential for cross-reactivity, ultimately determining the test’s performance. Methods: Predicting primers based on the consensus sequence of the target has multiple advantages, including high specificity, diagnostic reliability, broad applicability, and long-term validity. Automated curation of the input sequences ensures high-quality primers and probes. Results: Here, we present a use case for developing a set of consensus primers and probes to identify antibiotic resistance and virulence genes in Staphylococcus (S.) aureus using the ConsensusPrime pipeline. Extensive qPCR experiments with several S. aureus strains confirm the exceptional quality of the primers designed using the pipeline. Conclusions: By improving the quality of the input sequences and using the consensus sequence as a basis, the ConsensusPrime pipeline pipeline ensures high-quality primers and probes, which should be the basis of molecular assays.","PeriodicalId":72394,"journal":{"name":"BioMedInformatics","volume":" 75","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedInformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedinformatics4020068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness and reliability of diagnostic tests that detect DNA sequences largely hinge on the quality of the used primers and probes. This importance is especially evident when considering the specific sample being analyzed, as it affects the molecular background and potential for cross-reactivity, ultimately determining the test’s performance. Methods: Predicting primers based on the consensus sequence of the target has multiple advantages, including high specificity, diagnostic reliability, broad applicability, and long-term validity. Automated curation of the input sequences ensures high-quality primers and probes. Results: Here, we present a use case for developing a set of consensus primers and probes to identify antibiotic resistance and virulence genes in Staphylococcus (S.) aureus using the ConsensusPrime pipeline. Extensive qPCR experiments with several S. aureus strains confirm the exceptional quality of the primers designed using the pipeline. Conclusions: By improving the quality of the input sequences and using the consensus sequence as a basis, the ConsensusPrime pipeline pipeline ensures high-quality primers and probes, which should be the basis of molecular assays.
ConsensusPrime--高效共识引物设计的生物信息学管道--检测 MRSA 中的各种抗药性和毒性因子--案例研究
背景:检测 DNA 序列的诊断测试的有效性和可靠性在很大程度上取决于所用引物和探针的质量。这一重要性在考虑分析的具体样本时尤为明显,因为它会影响分子背景和潜在的交叉反应,最终决定检验的性能。方法根据目标物的共识序列预测引物具有多种优势,包括特异性高、诊断可靠、适用性广和长期有效。输入序列的自动整理可确保引物和探针的高质量。结果在此,我们介绍了利用 ConsensusPrime 管道开发一套共识引物和探针以鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌(S. aureus)抗生素耐药性和毒力基因的用例。用几种金黄色葡萄球菌菌株进行的大量 qPCR 实验证实了使用该管道设计的引物质量优异。结论通过提高输入序列的质量并以共识序列为基础,ConsensusPrime 管道确保了高质量的引物和探针,它们应成为分子检测的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信