Yield Comparison of Sweet Potato Grown in Four Commercial Organic Soils

Steven M. Still
{"title":"Yield Comparison of Sweet Potato Grown in Four Commercial Organic Soils","authors":"Steven M. Still","doi":"10.9734/arja/2024/v17i2451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: The experiment was conducted to observe the effects on comparative yields of sweet potato (Ipomea batatas ‘Beauregard’) grown in four different soilless media. \nStudy Design:  Mention the design of the study here. \nPlace and Duration of Study: Pullen Farm at Murray State University, in Murray, Kentucky, USA., between May 2018 and August 2018. \nMethodology: 16 3.048m x .3046m troughs (four of each treatment) each containing five sweet potato plants were established. No treatments received supplemental fertilization. Descriptive statistics and quantitative analysis were performed on yield characteristics of the sweet potato crop (sweet-potato tuber and biomass yields). \nResults: While a significant difference in mass of above-ground biomass between the treatments could not be determined, growth parameters of the Organiloc treatments (A, B) were marginally greater than treatments C and D (Table 1). The fresh weight of treatments A (38.91 t ha-1) and B (42.75 t ha-1) were statistically greater than treatment C (21.23 t ha-1). Treatment B was also statistically greater that treatment D (23.92 t ha-1). The number of tubers in treatment A and B were not significantly different than treatment D, but were significantly greater than treatment C (Fig. 2). \nConclusion: The results of this one cropping season study suggest that yields of sweet potatoes grown in these two biochar-based treatments (A + B), in which they were statistically greater than the Miracle Gro treatment (C), and Treatment B was statistically greater than the Magic Dirt treatment (D), may help to fulfill the increasing demand for locally-produced food and agricultural products while providing an efficient means of disposing of agricultural waste products and may promote sustainable crop production and food security.","PeriodicalId":372539,"journal":{"name":"Asian Research Journal of Agriculture","volume":" 71","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Research Journal of Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/arja/2024/v17i2451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aims: The experiment was conducted to observe the effects on comparative yields of sweet potato (Ipomea batatas ‘Beauregard’) grown in four different soilless media. Study Design:  Mention the design of the study here. Place and Duration of Study: Pullen Farm at Murray State University, in Murray, Kentucky, USA., between May 2018 and August 2018. Methodology: 16 3.048m x .3046m troughs (four of each treatment) each containing five sweet potato plants were established. No treatments received supplemental fertilization. Descriptive statistics and quantitative analysis were performed on yield characteristics of the sweet potato crop (sweet-potato tuber and biomass yields). Results: While a significant difference in mass of above-ground biomass between the treatments could not be determined, growth parameters of the Organiloc treatments (A, B) were marginally greater than treatments C and D (Table 1). The fresh weight of treatments A (38.91 t ha-1) and B (42.75 t ha-1) were statistically greater than treatment C (21.23 t ha-1). Treatment B was also statistically greater that treatment D (23.92 t ha-1). The number of tubers in treatment A and B were not significantly different than treatment D, but were significantly greater than treatment C (Fig. 2). Conclusion: The results of this one cropping season study suggest that yields of sweet potatoes grown in these two biochar-based treatments (A + B), in which they were statistically greater than the Miracle Gro treatment (C), and Treatment B was statistically greater than the Magic Dirt treatment (D), may help to fulfill the increasing demand for locally-produced food and agricultural products while providing an efficient means of disposing of agricultural waste products and may promote sustainable crop production and food security.
在四种商用有机土壤中种植甘薯的产量比较
目的:本实验旨在观察在四种不同的无土栽培介质中种植甘薯(Ipomea batatas 'Beauregard')对产量比较的影响。研究设计: 请在此处说明研究设计。研究地点和时间:美国肯塔基州默里市默里州立大学普伦农场,2018年5月至2018年8月。方法:建立了 16 个 3.048m x .3046m 的水槽(每个处理 4 个),每个水槽种植 5 株甘薯。没有任何处理接受补充施肥。对甘薯作物的产量特征(甘薯块茎和生物量产量)进行了描述性统计和定量分析。结果:虽然无法确定各处理之间地上生物量的显著差异,但 Organiloc 处理(A、B)的生长参数略高于 C 和 D 处理(表 1)。据统计,处理 A(38.91 吨/公顷)和处理 B(42.75 吨/公顷)的鲜重高于处理 C(21.23 吨/公顷)。处理 B 在统计上也大于处理 D(23.92 吨/公顷-1)。处理 A 和处理 B 的块茎数量与处理 D 相比差异不大,但明显多于处理 C(图 2)。结论这一单季研究的结果表明,在这两种生物炭处理(A + B)中种植的甘薯产量在统计学上高于 Miracle Gro 处理(C),而处理 B 在统计学上高于 Magic Dirt 处理(D),这可能有助于满足人们对当地生产的食品和农产品日益增长的需求,同时提供了一种处理农业废品的有效方法,并可促进可持续作物生产和粮食安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信