Do erupting maxillary canines resorb adjacent teeth? A study focusing both on the ipsilateral and contralateral sides among individuals with unilaterally impacted canines

Mélanie Le Ven, F. Rafflenbeul, Catherine-Isabelle Gros, François Lefebvre, Y. Bolender
{"title":"Do erupting maxillary canines resorb adjacent teeth? A study focusing both on the ipsilateral and contralateral sides among individuals with unilaterally impacted canines","authors":"Mélanie Le Ven, F. Rafflenbeul, Catherine-Isabelle Gros, François Lefebvre, Y. Bolender","doi":"10.2319/092723-655.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n To determine the prevalence of root resorption of teeth adjacent to permanent maxillary canines on both sides, by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), in pretreatment adolescent subjects with unilaterally impacted maxillary canines, and to define predictive factors for the root resorption.\n \n \n \n This retrospective sample included 76 adolescents (38 boys, 38 girls, mean age 12.3 ± 2.1 years; range 8–17 years) who had CBCT after detection of a unilateral impacted maxillary canine before any active orthodontic treatment. Both ipsilateral and contralateral sides were examined, and 14 qualitative and quantitative variables were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and multiple logistic regression was used to predict root resorption.\n \n \n \n On the impaction side, 57.9% of canines resorbed at least one adjacent tooth compared with 13.2% on the contralateral side (P < .001). On the impaction side, resorption was slight in 59.6%, moderate in 5.8%, and severe in 34.6% of the cases. On the contralateral side, resorption was slight in 91.7%, moderate in 0%, and severe in 8.3% of the cases. On both sides, upper lateral incisors were the teeth most frequently resorbed, followed by the upper first premolars and upper central incisors. The presence of contact between the canine and the adjacent roots was the only statistically significant risk factor for resorption for both ipsilateral and contralateral sides.\n \n \n \n Orthodontists should look for root resorption on both sides in cases of unilaterally impacted maxillary canines.\n","PeriodicalId":503286,"journal":{"name":"The Angle Orthodontist","volume":" 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle Orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/092723-655.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine the prevalence of root resorption of teeth adjacent to permanent maxillary canines on both sides, by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), in pretreatment adolescent subjects with unilaterally impacted maxillary canines, and to define predictive factors for the root resorption. This retrospective sample included 76 adolescents (38 boys, 38 girls, mean age 12.3 ± 2.1 years; range 8–17 years) who had CBCT after detection of a unilateral impacted maxillary canine before any active orthodontic treatment. Both ipsilateral and contralateral sides were examined, and 14 qualitative and quantitative variables were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and multiple logistic regression was used to predict root resorption. On the impaction side, 57.9% of canines resorbed at least one adjacent tooth compared with 13.2% on the contralateral side (P < .001). On the impaction side, resorption was slight in 59.6%, moderate in 5.8%, and severe in 34.6% of the cases. On the contralateral side, resorption was slight in 91.7%, moderate in 0%, and severe in 8.3% of the cases. On both sides, upper lateral incisors were the teeth most frequently resorbed, followed by the upper first premolars and upper central incisors. The presence of contact between the canine and the adjacent roots was the only statistically significant risk factor for resorption for both ipsilateral and contralateral sides. Orthodontists should look for root resorption on both sides in cases of unilaterally impacted maxillary canines.
萌出的上颌犬齿会吸收邻牙吗?一项针对单侧阻生犬齿患者的同侧和对侧研究
目的:通过锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)确定单侧上颌犬齿撞击的青少年患者在治疗前上颌恒牙两侧邻近牙齿的牙根吸收率,并确定牙根吸收的预测因素。 该回顾性样本包括 76 名青少年(38 名男孩,38 名女孩,平均年龄为 12.3 ± 2.1 岁;年龄范围为 8-17 岁),他们在接受任何积极的正畸治疗前发现单侧上颌犬齿撞击后接受了 CBCT 检查。对同侧和对侧进行了检查,并收集了 14 个定性和定量变量。计算了描述性统计数字,并使用多元逻辑回归预测牙根吸收。 在阻塞侧,57.9%的犬齿至少有一颗邻牙吸收,而在对侧只有13.2%(P < .001)。在阻塞侧,59.6%的病例牙齿有轻度吸收,5.8%的病例有中度吸收,34.6%的病例有重度吸收。在对侧,91.7%的病例为轻度吸收,0%为中度吸收,8.3%为重度吸收。在两侧牙齿中,上侧切牙是最常发生吸收的牙齿,其次是上第一前磨牙和上中切牙。在同侧和对侧,犬齿与邻近牙根之间存在接触是导致牙齿吸收的唯一具有统计学意义的风险因素。 在单侧上颌犬齿受影响的病例中,正畸医生应注意两侧牙根的吸收情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信