Metrics for stabilization of fecal sludge and relation to dewatering metrics

Kapanda Kapanda, S. Sam, Nienke Andriessen, Barbara Jeanne Ward, L. Strande, J. Tembo
{"title":"Metrics for stabilization of fecal sludge and relation to dewatering metrics","authors":"Kapanda Kapanda, S. Sam, Nienke Andriessen, Barbara Jeanne Ward, L. Strande, J. Tembo","doi":"10.2166/washdev.2024.318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Stabilization and dewatering are essential treatment mechanisms for the management of fecal sludge (FS) that accumulates in onsite containment. FS is typically 80–95% water, which needs to be removed, with varying levels of organic matter that require stabilization. Observed levels of FS stabilization are related to dewatering performance. This study evaluated rapid and low-cost metrics of stabilization and their relation to dewaterability. Potential metrics were selected through a two-stage process: screening using a decision matrix and laboratory evaluation to determine method performance and suitability. FS samples (n = 27) were collected and nine parameters related to stabilization and dewatering performance were analyzed. The study found that metrics based on physical–chemical characteristics such as volatile/total solids (VS/TS) and biological oxygen demand/chemical oxygen demand (BOD/COD) were not reliable for measuring FS stabilization and its relation to dewaterability. Metrics that rely on microbial activity such as SOUR (Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate) are more promising based on the consistent results obtained throughout this study.","PeriodicalId":516652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2024.318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stabilization and dewatering are essential treatment mechanisms for the management of fecal sludge (FS) that accumulates in onsite containment. FS is typically 80–95% water, which needs to be removed, with varying levels of organic matter that require stabilization. Observed levels of FS stabilization are related to dewatering performance. This study evaluated rapid and low-cost metrics of stabilization and their relation to dewaterability. Potential metrics were selected through a two-stage process: screening using a decision matrix and laboratory evaluation to determine method performance and suitability. FS samples (n = 27) were collected and nine parameters related to stabilization and dewatering performance were analyzed. The study found that metrics based on physical–chemical characteristics such as volatile/total solids (VS/TS) and biological oxygen demand/chemical oxygen demand (BOD/COD) were not reliable for measuring FS stabilization and its relation to dewaterability. Metrics that rely on microbial activity such as SOUR (Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate) are more promising based on the consistent results obtained throughout this study.
粪便污泥稳定化指标及与脱水指标的关系
稳定化和脱水是管理现场围堰中积聚的粪便污泥(FS)的基本处理机制。粪便污泥通常含有 80-95% 的水分(需要去除)和不同含量的有机物,需要进行稳定化处理。观察到的 FS 稳定化水平与脱水性能有关。本研究评估了快速、低成本的稳定化指标及其与脱水性能的关系。潜在指标的选择分为两个阶段:使用决策矩阵进行筛选,以及进行实验室评估以确定方法的性能和适用性。收集了 FS 样品(n = 27),并分析了与稳定和脱水性能有关的九个参数。研究发现,基于物理化学特征的指标,如挥发性/总固体(VS/TS)和生物需氧量/化学需氧量(BOD/COD),在测量 FS 稳定性及其与脱水性能的关系方面并不可靠。根据本研究获得的一致结果,依赖于微生物活性的指标,如 SOUR(比氧吸收率),更有前途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信