Locoregional vs. General Anaesthesia for Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis: A Feasibility Study

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY
F. Pennestri', P. Procopio, Francesca Prioli, P. Gallucci, L. Sessa, Annamaria Martullo, A. Laurino, L. Revelli, Cristina Modesti, C. De Crea, M. Raffaelli
{"title":"Locoregional vs. General Anaesthesia for Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis: A Feasibility Study","authors":"F. Pennestri', P. Procopio, Francesca Prioli, P. Gallucci, L. Sessa, Annamaria Martullo, A. Laurino, L. Revelli, Cristina Modesti, C. De Crea, M. Raffaelli","doi":"10.3390/std13020012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Focused parathyroidectomy is the preferred surgical method for treating primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) sustained by the pre-operatively well-localized parathyroid adenoma. We aimed to compare the effectiveness, safety, and short-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) in locoregional anaesthesia (LA) vs. general anaesthesia (GA) by means of propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Retrospective research of patients who underwent MIVAP between January 2014 and December 2022 was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups based on the anaesthesiologic procedure (LA vs. GA). Overall, 553 patients underwent MIVAP. After PSM, 115 patients in the LA group and 230 patients in the GA group were included. MIVAP under LA was associated with shorter median operative time (16 vs. 35 min, p < 0.001), shorter median operative room occupation time (44 vs. 73 min, p < 0.001), and lesser median post-operative visual analogue scale pain, with comparable post-operative hospital stay and complication rate. MIVAP under LA is a safe and feasible procedure with significant advantages over GA in terms of post-operative pain and operative room occupation time. This last step can finally result in more efficient utilisation of the operative room and the health care system’s resources.","PeriodicalId":40379,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Techniques Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Techniques Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/std13020012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Focused parathyroidectomy is the preferred surgical method for treating primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) sustained by the pre-operatively well-localized parathyroid adenoma. We aimed to compare the effectiveness, safety, and short-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) in locoregional anaesthesia (LA) vs. general anaesthesia (GA) by means of propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Retrospective research of patients who underwent MIVAP between January 2014 and December 2022 was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups based on the anaesthesiologic procedure (LA vs. GA). Overall, 553 patients underwent MIVAP. After PSM, 115 patients in the LA group and 230 patients in the GA group were included. MIVAP under LA was associated with shorter median operative time (16 vs. 35 min, p < 0.001), shorter median operative room occupation time (44 vs. 73 min, p < 0.001), and lesser median post-operative visual analogue scale pain, with comparable post-operative hospital stay and complication rate. MIVAP under LA is a safe and feasible procedure with significant advantages over GA in terms of post-operative pain and operative room occupation time. This last step can finally result in more efficient utilisation of the operative room and the health care system’s resources.
使用倾向得分匹配分析进行微创视频辅助甲状旁腺切除术 (MIVAP) 的局部麻醉与全身麻醉:可行性研究
聚焦甲状旁腺切除术是治疗由术前定位良好的甲状旁腺腺瘤引起的原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症(pHPT)的首选手术方法。我们的目的是通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析,比较微创视频辅助甲状旁腺切除术(MIVAP)在局部麻醉(LA)与全身麻醉(GA)下的有效性、安全性和短期临床结果。对2014年1月至2022年12月期间接受MIVAP的患者进行了回顾性研究。根据麻醉程序(LA 与 GA)将患者分为两组。共有 553 名患者接受了 MIVAP。在 PSM 之后,LA 组和 GA 组分别纳入了 115 名和 230 名患者。在 LA 下进行 MIVAP,中位手术时间更短(16 分钟对 35 分钟,P < 0.001),中位手术室占用时间更短(44 分钟对 73 分钟,P < 0.001),中位术后视觉模拟评分疼痛更轻,术后住院时间和并发症发生率相当。LA下的MIVAP是一种安全可行的手术,在术后疼痛和手术室占用时间方面明显优于GA。这最后一步最终可以更有效地利用手术室和医疗系统的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信