Crop Phenology Estimation in Rice Fields Using Sentinel-1 GRD SAR Data and Machine Learning-Aided Particle Filtering Approach

Jie Yang, Hongtao Shi, Qinghua Xie, Juan M. Lopez-Sanchez, Xing Peng, Jianghao Yu, Lei Chen
{"title":"Crop Phenology Estimation in Rice Fields Using Sentinel-1 GRD SAR Data and Machine Learning-Aided Particle Filtering Approach","authors":"Jie Yang, Hongtao Shi, Qinghua Xie, Juan M. Lopez-Sanchez, Xing Peng, Jianghao Yu, Lei Chen","doi":"10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-1-2024-799-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Monitoring crop phenology is essential for managing field disasters, protecting the environment, and making decisions about agricultural productivity. Because of its high timeliness, high resolution, great penetration, and sensitivity to specific structural elements, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is a valuable technique for crop phenology estimation. Particle filtering (PF) belongs to the family of dynamical approach and has the ability to predict crop phenology with SAR data in real time. The observation equation is a key factor affecting the accuracy of particle filtering estimation and depends on fitting. Compared to the common polynomial fitting (POLY), machine learning methods can automatically learn features and handle complex data structures, offering greater flexibility and generalization capabilities. Therefore, incorporating two ensemble learning algorithms consisting of support vector machine regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), respectively, we proposed two machine learning-aided particle filtering approaches (PF-SVR, PF-RFR) to estimate crop phenology. One year of time-series Sentinel-1 GRD SAR data in 2017 covering rice fields in Sevilla region in Spain was used for establishing the observation and prediction equations, and the other year of data in 2018 was used for validating the prediction accuracy of PF methods. Four polarization features (VV, VH, VH/VV and Radar Vegetation Index (RVI)) were exploited as the observations in modeling. Experimental results reveals that the machine learning-aided methods are superior than the PF-POLY method. The PF-SVR exhibited better performance than the PF-RFR and PF-POLY methods. The optimal outcome from PF-SVR yielded a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 7.79, compared to 7.94 for PF-RFR and 9.1 for PF-POLY. Moreover, the results suggest that the RVI is generally more sensitive than other features to crop phenology and the performance of polarization features presented consistent among all methods, i.e., RVI>VV>VH>VH/VV. Our findings offer valuable references for real-time crop phenology monitoring with SAR data.\n","PeriodicalId":505918,"journal":{"name":"The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","volume":" 1149","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-1-2024-799-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Monitoring crop phenology is essential for managing field disasters, protecting the environment, and making decisions about agricultural productivity. Because of its high timeliness, high resolution, great penetration, and sensitivity to specific structural elements, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is a valuable technique for crop phenology estimation. Particle filtering (PF) belongs to the family of dynamical approach and has the ability to predict crop phenology with SAR data in real time. The observation equation is a key factor affecting the accuracy of particle filtering estimation and depends on fitting. Compared to the common polynomial fitting (POLY), machine learning methods can automatically learn features and handle complex data structures, offering greater flexibility and generalization capabilities. Therefore, incorporating two ensemble learning algorithms consisting of support vector machine regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), respectively, we proposed two machine learning-aided particle filtering approaches (PF-SVR, PF-RFR) to estimate crop phenology. One year of time-series Sentinel-1 GRD SAR data in 2017 covering rice fields in Sevilla region in Spain was used for establishing the observation and prediction equations, and the other year of data in 2018 was used for validating the prediction accuracy of PF methods. Four polarization features (VV, VH, VH/VV and Radar Vegetation Index (RVI)) were exploited as the observations in modeling. Experimental results reveals that the machine learning-aided methods are superior than the PF-POLY method. The PF-SVR exhibited better performance than the PF-RFR and PF-POLY methods. The optimal outcome from PF-SVR yielded a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 7.79, compared to 7.94 for PF-RFR and 9.1 for PF-POLY. Moreover, the results suggest that the RVI is generally more sensitive than other features to crop phenology and the performance of polarization features presented consistent among all methods, i.e., RVI>VV>VH>VH/VV. Our findings offer valuable references for real-time crop phenology monitoring with SAR data.
利用哨兵-1 GRD合成孔径雷达数据和机器学习辅助粒子滤波方法估算稻田作物物候期
摘要监测作物物候对于管理田间灾害、保护环境和制定农业生产决策至关重要。合成孔径雷达(SAR)具有高时效性、高分辨率、高穿透性以及对特定结构元素的敏感性等特点,是估测农作物物候的重要技术。粒子滤波(PF)属于动力学方法,能够利用合成孔径雷达数据实时预测作物物候。观测方程是影响粒子滤波估计精度的关键因素,并取决于拟合。与常见的多项式拟合(POLY)相比,机器学习方法可以自动学习特征并处理复杂的数据结构,具有更大的灵活性和泛化能力。因此,我们结合由支持向量机回归(SVR)和随机森林回归(RFR)分别组成的两种集合学习算法,提出了两种机器学习辅助粒子滤波方法(PF-SVR、PF-RFR)来估计作物物候。其中,2017 年的一年时间序列 Sentinel-1 GRD SAR 数据用于建立观测和预测方程,覆盖西班牙塞维利亚地区的水稻田;2018 年的另一年数据用于验证 PF 方法的预测精度。建模时利用了四个偏振特征(VV、VH、VH/VV 和雷达植被指数(RVI))作为观测值。实验结果表明,机器学习辅助方法优于 PF-POLY 方法。PF-SVR 的性能优于 PF-RFR 和 PF-POLY 方法。PF-SVR 的最优结果均方根误差(RMSE)为 7.79,而 PF-RFR 为 7.94,PF-POLY 为 9.1。此外,研究结果表明,RVI 通常比其他特征对作物物候更为敏感,而且偏振特征在所有方法中表现一致,即 RVI>V>VH>VH/VV。我们的研究结果为利用合成孔径雷达数据实时监测作物物候提供了有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信