To Observe the Dynamic Balance Problem in Deaf Children`s Via Four Square Step Test

Falak Qayoum, Muhammad Hashim Pirzado, Mehak Shaikh, Muhammad Uman, Shaista Rauf, Abdul Qudoos Shaikh
{"title":"To Observe the Dynamic Balance Problem in Deaf Children`s Via Four Square Step Test","authors":"Falak Qayoum, Muhammad Hashim Pirzado, Mehak Shaikh, Muhammad Uman, Shaista Rauf, Abdul Qudoos Shaikh","doi":"10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hearing loss is often associated with challenges in dynamic balance among children, impacting their daily activities and quality of life. This study aims to explore the relationship between varying degrees of hearing loss and dynamic balance capabilities among children, addressing a gap in current research on the physiological impacts of auditory impairments.\nObjective: To assess and compare the dynamic balance of children with different severities of hearing loss and to establish if there is a linear relationship between hearing loss severity and balance performance.\nMethods: A total of 302 children aged 4 to 15 years with varying degrees of hearing loss were recruited for this study. Participants were categorized into subgroups labeled as profound, severe, moderate, and minor hearing loss based on stop-watch tests. The Four Box Step Test was employed to measure each participant's dynamic balance. Data normality was verified using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and differences among groups were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test.\nResults: This study assessed the dynamic balance in children with varying degrees of hearing loss, analyzing data from 172 participants aged 4 to 15 years. The analysis revealed significant gender differences in dynamic balance, with males generally outperforming females. The age-based assessment demonstrated a negative linear trend, indicating that dynamic balance decreases as age increases, with significant variances across different age groups (F(2, 166) = 3.91, p = 0.022). Two-way ANOVA confirmed no significant interaction between gender and age on dynamic balance (F(2, 166) = 2.82, p = 0.062), highlighting that while age significantly affects balance, gender alone does not show a substantial impact.\nConclusion: Dynamic balance decreases as the severity of hearing loss increases, with males generally outperforming females. This study underscores the importance of incorporating balance training in rehabilitation programs for children with hearing loss to enhance their motor performance and safety.","PeriodicalId":507812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hearing loss is often associated with challenges in dynamic balance among children, impacting their daily activities and quality of life. This study aims to explore the relationship between varying degrees of hearing loss and dynamic balance capabilities among children, addressing a gap in current research on the physiological impacts of auditory impairments. Objective: To assess and compare the dynamic balance of children with different severities of hearing loss and to establish if there is a linear relationship between hearing loss severity and balance performance. Methods: A total of 302 children aged 4 to 15 years with varying degrees of hearing loss were recruited for this study. Participants were categorized into subgroups labeled as profound, severe, moderate, and minor hearing loss based on stop-watch tests. The Four Box Step Test was employed to measure each participant's dynamic balance. Data normality was verified using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and differences among groups were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test. Results: This study assessed the dynamic balance in children with varying degrees of hearing loss, analyzing data from 172 participants aged 4 to 15 years. The analysis revealed significant gender differences in dynamic balance, with males generally outperforming females. The age-based assessment demonstrated a negative linear trend, indicating that dynamic balance decreases as age increases, with significant variances across different age groups (F(2, 166) = 3.91, p = 0.022). Two-way ANOVA confirmed no significant interaction between gender and age on dynamic balance (F(2, 166) = 2.82, p = 0.062), highlighting that while age significantly affects balance, gender alone does not show a substantial impact. Conclusion: Dynamic balance decreases as the severity of hearing loss increases, with males generally outperforming females. This study underscores the importance of incorporating balance training in rehabilitation programs for children with hearing loss to enhance their motor performance and safety.
通过四方步测试观察聋哑儿童的动态平衡问题
背景:听力损失往往与儿童在动态平衡方面面临的挑战有关,影响他们的日常活动和生活质量。本研究旨在探讨儿童不同程度的听力损失与动态平衡能力之间的关系,弥补目前在听觉障碍的生理影响方面的研究空白:评估和比较不同听力损失程度儿童的动态平衡能力,并确定听力损失严重程度与平衡能力之间是否存在线性关系:本研究共招募了 302 名不同程度听力损失的 4 至 15 岁儿童。根据停表测试结果,参与者被分为听力损失严重、重度、中度和轻度四个亚组。四箱步法测试用于测量每位参与者的动态平衡能力。采用 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验法验证数据的正态性,并采用双向方差分析和 Tukey 后检验法分析组间差异:本研究评估了不同程度听力损失儿童的动态平衡能力,分析了 172 名 4 至 15 岁参与者的数据。分析结果显示,在动态平衡方面存在明显的性别差异,男性普遍优于女性。基于年龄的评估结果呈负线性趋势,表明动态平衡能力随着年龄的增长而下降,不同年龄组的差异显著(F(2, 166) = 3.91, p = 0.022)。双向方差分析证实,性别和年龄对动态平衡没有显著的交互作用(F(2,166)= 2.82,p = 0.062),这突出表明,虽然年龄对平衡有显著影响,但单独的性别并没有显示出实质性的影响:结论:随着听力损失严重程度的增加,动态平衡能力也随之下降,男性通常优于女性。这项研究强调了将平衡训练纳入听力损失儿童康复计划的重要性,以提高他们的运动表现和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信