Problematic aspects of the implementation of artificial intelligence in the field of jurisprudence

V. Hryshko, S. Vozniuk
{"title":"Problematic aspects of the implementation of artificial intelligence in the field of jurisprudence","authors":"V. Hryshko, S. Vozniuk","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to highlighting problematic aspects of the implementation of artificial intelligence in the field of jurisprudence, in particular, in certain branches of law. Due to the rapid development of neural network capabilities, artificial intelligence is a tool for quickly completing tasks and processing information in various spheres of society, including in jurisprudence. Therefore, for a comprehensive analysis, it is necessary to identify problem areas for the implementation of such a phenomenon. \nIt is noted that today there is no unified approach to defining the concept of artificial intelligence. The authors provide several definitions of this concept for the most complete understanding of the essence of artificial intelligence. The legislation does not contain a normative legal act dedicated to the issue of the essence and procedure for using artificial intelligence, which gives rise to such dilemmas. Despite the widespread use of artificial intelligence capabilities among citizens, there is a lack of interest, funding and development of educational methods for the effective use of artificial intelligence in professional activities on the part of government authorities. It is also stated that the introduction of artificial intelligence into professional activities requires staffing with specialists who can service the software. \nThe problems of introducing artificial intelligence in the field of legal proceedings are analyzed. The use of artificial intelligence by courts risks undermining the autonomy of courts and the independence of judges. Artificial intelligence is not able to comprehensively evaluate evidence and make decisions based on moral standards. The issues of transparency of courts, guaranteeing fundamental human rights and freedoms, and software reliability remain open. \nThe legal status of artificial intelligence in civil law is considered. Since artificial intelligence is capable of creating a work, questions remain regarding the protection of copyrights using artificial intelligence and legal liability in case of copyright infringement. A debatable and controversial topic is the definition of artificial intelligence as a subject or object in a civil legal relationship. \nIt has been determined that the introduction of artificial intelligence in criminal proceedings can become a factor in increasing cyber attacks on the neural network with the aim of stealing, destroying, and making data public.","PeriodicalId":227965,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to highlighting problematic aspects of the implementation of artificial intelligence in the field of jurisprudence, in particular, in certain branches of law. Due to the rapid development of neural network capabilities, artificial intelligence is a tool for quickly completing tasks and processing information in various spheres of society, including in jurisprudence. Therefore, for a comprehensive analysis, it is necessary to identify problem areas for the implementation of such a phenomenon. It is noted that today there is no unified approach to defining the concept of artificial intelligence. The authors provide several definitions of this concept for the most complete understanding of the essence of artificial intelligence. The legislation does not contain a normative legal act dedicated to the issue of the essence and procedure for using artificial intelligence, which gives rise to such dilemmas. Despite the widespread use of artificial intelligence capabilities among citizens, there is a lack of interest, funding and development of educational methods for the effective use of artificial intelligence in professional activities on the part of government authorities. It is also stated that the introduction of artificial intelligence into professional activities requires staffing with specialists who can service the software. The problems of introducing artificial intelligence in the field of legal proceedings are analyzed. The use of artificial intelligence by courts risks undermining the autonomy of courts and the independence of judges. Artificial intelligence is not able to comprehensively evaluate evidence and make decisions based on moral standards. The issues of transparency of courts, guaranteeing fundamental human rights and freedoms, and software reliability remain open. The legal status of artificial intelligence in civil law is considered. Since artificial intelligence is capable of creating a work, questions remain regarding the protection of copyrights using artificial intelligence and legal liability in case of copyright infringement. A debatable and controversial topic is the definition of artificial intelligence as a subject or object in a civil legal relationship. It has been determined that the introduction of artificial intelligence in criminal proceedings can become a factor in increasing cyber attacks on the neural network with the aim of stealing, destroying, and making data public.
在法学领域实施人工智能的问题所在
这篇文章致力于强调在法学领域,特别是在某些法律分支中实施人工智能的问题所在。由于神经网络能力的快速发展,人工智能成为社会各领域(包括法学)快速完成任务和处理信息的工具。因此,为了进行全面分析,有必要确定实施这种现象的问题领域。需要指出的是,如今还没有统一的方法来定义人工智能的概念。为了最全面地理解人工智能的本质,作者为这一概念提供了多个定义。立法中没有专门针对人工智能的本质和使用程序问题的规范性法案,这就造成了这种困境。尽管公民广泛使用人工智能能力,但政府当局对在专业活动中有效使用人工智能缺乏兴趣、资金和教育方法的发展。还有人指出,将人工智能引入专业活动需要配备能够为软件提供服务的专家。分析了在法律诉讼领域引入人工智能的问题。法院使用人工智能有可能损害法院的自主权和法官的独立性。人工智能无法全面评估证据并根据道德标准做出裁决。法院的透明度、基本人权和自由的保障以及软件的可靠性等问题仍然悬而未决。审议了人工智能在民法中的法律地位。由于人工智能能够创作作品,因此在利用人工智能保护版权和侵犯版权的法律责任方面仍然存在问题。人工智能作为民事法律关系中的主体或客体的定义是一个值得商榷和争议的话题。已经确定,在刑事诉讼中引入人工智能可能成为增加对神经网络的网络攻击的一个因素,其目的是窃取、破坏和公开数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信