Control of compliance with norms of international humanitarian law when using weapons controlled by artificial intelligence

T. Fedchuk
{"title":"Control of compliance with norms of international humanitarian law when using weapons controlled by artificial intelligence","authors":"T. Fedchuk","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efforts by states to regulate the development of technology become a unique problem when it comes to artificial intelligence (AI). It is impossible to predict all possible consequences of its use in the military sphere, making a choice in favor of its advantages. The world has realized the fact that the use of weapons controlled by AI requires not only legal regulation, but also control of compliance with international legal norms, revision of methods of warfare in accordance with the new reality. The definition of what constitutes an \"weapon with artificial intelligence”, \"artificial intelligence” itself, and their legal status - remain open to interpretation in technical, military and legal circles. \nThe article analyzes separate issues of regulating the development, distribution and use of weapons with artificial intelligence (hereinafter - AI). It is emphasized that although AI systems are a fundamentally new way of waging war, controlling their use and imposing restrictions does not constitute a completely new task for international humanitarian law (hereinafter - IHL). It is still based on the established principles that were used to regulate existing types of weapons and should be extended to the use of anti-aircraft weapons: the principle of distinguishing targets, the principle of proportionality, the principle of using precautionary measures during an attack. \nAt the same time, AI has a number of characteristics that make it difficult to control. As a general-purpose technology, AI has many non­military and defense applications. Unlike military technology, it is developed primarily in the civilian sector. And although the widespread use of AI calls into question a complete ban on its military use, the international community should work together to regulate or ban certain types of military AI use. \nThe optimal solution to the problem could be the adoption of a corresponding international codified act, which would define the concept, regulate the creation and application of autonomous systems of the ZHI, as well as contain mechanisms of control and responsibility for violations of these norms.","PeriodicalId":227965,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","volume":"9 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efforts by states to regulate the development of technology become a unique problem when it comes to artificial intelligence (AI). It is impossible to predict all possible consequences of its use in the military sphere, making a choice in favor of its advantages. The world has realized the fact that the use of weapons controlled by AI requires not only legal regulation, but also control of compliance with international legal norms, revision of methods of warfare in accordance with the new reality. The definition of what constitutes an "weapon with artificial intelligence”, "artificial intelligence” itself, and their legal status - remain open to interpretation in technical, military and legal circles. The article analyzes separate issues of regulating the development, distribution and use of weapons with artificial intelligence (hereinafter - AI). It is emphasized that although AI systems are a fundamentally new way of waging war, controlling their use and imposing restrictions does not constitute a completely new task for international humanitarian law (hereinafter - IHL). It is still based on the established principles that were used to regulate existing types of weapons and should be extended to the use of anti-aircraft weapons: the principle of distinguishing targets, the principle of proportionality, the principle of using precautionary measures during an attack. At the same time, AI has a number of characteristics that make it difficult to control. As a general-purpose technology, AI has many non­military and defense applications. Unlike military technology, it is developed primarily in the civilian sector. And although the widespread use of AI calls into question a complete ban on its military use, the international community should work together to regulate or ban certain types of military AI use. The optimal solution to the problem could be the adoption of a corresponding international codified act, which would define the concept, regulate the creation and application of autonomous systems of the ZHI, as well as contain mechanisms of control and responsibility for violations of these norms.
在使用人工智能控制的武器时对遵守国际人道主义法准则情况的控制
当涉及人工智能(AI)时,国家规范技术发展的努力就成了一个独特的问题。在军事领域使用人工智能不可能预测所有可能的后果,也不可能做出有利于人工智能优势的选择。世界已经认识到,使用由人工智能控制的武器不仅需要法律监管,还需要控制国际法律规范的遵守情况,并根据新的现实修改战争方法。什么是 "人工智能武器"、"人工智能 "本身的定义及其法律地位--在技术、军事和法律界仍有待解释。本文分析了规范人工智能武器(以下简称 "人工智能")的研发、分配和使用的不同问题。文章强调,尽管人工智能系统是一种全新的战争方式,但控制其使用和施加限制并不构成国际人道主义法(以下简称 "国际人道法")的全新任务。它仍然基于用于规范现有武器类型的既定原则,并应扩展到防空武器的使用:区分目标原则、相称性原则、攻击期间采取预防措施的原则。同时,人工智能也有一些难以控制的特点。作为一种通用技术,人工智能有许多非军事和国防应用。与军事技术不同,它主要是在民用领域开发的。虽然人工智能的广泛应用让人质疑是否应完全禁止其军事用途,但国际社会应共同努力,规范或禁止某些类型的人工智能军事用途。解决这一问题的最佳办法可能是通过一项相应的国际成文法,其中将界定 ZHI 自主系统的概念、规范其创建和应用,并包含控制机制和违反这些规范的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信