The Antinomy of Agrarian Reform Regulations After the Establishment of the Land Bank Authority

Bayu Praditya Herusantoso
{"title":"The Antinomy of Agrarian Reform Regulations After the Establishment of the Land Bank Authority","authors":"Bayu Praditya Herusantoso","doi":"10.19184/jik.v5i1.46593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The establishment of the Land Bank through Government Regulation No. 64 of 2021 introduces a significant framework designed to secure land availability for public, social, national development, economic equality, land consolidation, and agrarian reform purposes. This regulation marks a new phase in agrarian reform, particularly with the introduction of Presidential Regulation 62 of 2023, which replaces earlier regulations (Nos. 88 of 2017 and 86 of 2018) to streamline and enhance the effectiveness of land reforms. Despite its mandate to allocate 30% of land for agrarian reform, the Land Bank faces challenges due to overlapping land acquisition sources, which often intersect with lands designated for agrarian reform. This research utilizes normative juridical methods to analyze these conflicts between the regulations governing the Land Bank and the enhanced framework provided by the Presidential Regulation on Acceleration of Agrarian Reform. The findings highlight a significant overlap between the targeted lands for agrarian reform and those acquired by the Land Bank. This overlap results in discrepancies in land rights among subjects of land redistribution, who are affected differently depending on whether lands are under the management rights of the Land Bank. The study suggests that legal harmonization efforts are necessary to address these conflicts, recommending the application of Lex superiori derogat legi inferiori, where higher legislation should override lower ones. Such harmonization is critical to resolve norm conflicts and ensure the equitable distribution of land rights, thereby facilitating the objectives of agrarian reform. \nKEYWORDS : Antinomy, Agrarian Reform, Land Bank","PeriodicalId":196521,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan","volume":"112 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v5i1.46593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The establishment of the Land Bank through Government Regulation No. 64 of 2021 introduces a significant framework designed to secure land availability for public, social, national development, economic equality, land consolidation, and agrarian reform purposes. This regulation marks a new phase in agrarian reform, particularly with the introduction of Presidential Regulation 62 of 2023, which replaces earlier regulations (Nos. 88 of 2017 and 86 of 2018) to streamline and enhance the effectiveness of land reforms. Despite its mandate to allocate 30% of land for agrarian reform, the Land Bank faces challenges due to overlapping land acquisition sources, which often intersect with lands designated for agrarian reform. This research utilizes normative juridical methods to analyze these conflicts between the regulations governing the Land Bank and the enhanced framework provided by the Presidential Regulation on Acceleration of Agrarian Reform. The findings highlight a significant overlap between the targeted lands for agrarian reform and those acquired by the Land Bank. This overlap results in discrepancies in land rights among subjects of land redistribution, who are affected differently depending on whether lands are under the management rights of the Land Bank. The study suggests that legal harmonization efforts are necessary to address these conflicts, recommending the application of Lex superiori derogat legi inferiori, where higher legislation should override lower ones. Such harmonization is critical to resolve norm conflicts and ensure the equitable distribution of land rights, thereby facilitating the objectives of agrarian reform. KEYWORDS : Antinomy, Agrarian Reform, Land Bank
土地银行管理局成立后土地改革法规的对立面
通过 2021 年第 64 号政府条例建立的土地银行引入了一个重要框架,旨在确保为公共、社会、国家发展、经济平等、土地整合和土地改革目的提供土地。该条例标志着土地改革进入了一个新阶段,特别是随着 2023 年第 62 号总统条例的出台,该条例取代了之前的条例(2017 年第 88 号和 2018 年第 86 号),以简化和提高土地改革的成效。尽管土地银行的任务是为土地改革分配 30% 的土地,但由于土地征用来源重叠,经常与指定用于土地改革的土地交叉,土地银行面临着挑战。本研究利用规范法学方法分析了土地银行管理条例与《加快土地改革总统条例》所提供的强化框架之间的冲突。研究结果突出表明,土地改革的目标土地与土地银行收购的土地之间存在严重重叠。这种重叠造成了土地再分配对象之间土地权利的差异,根据土地是否属于土地银行的管理权限,他们受到的影响也不同。研究表明,有必要努力协调法律,以解决这些冲突,并建议适用 Lex superiori derogat legi inferiori(上位法优先于下位法)。这种协调对于解决规范冲突和确保土地权的公平分配至关重要,从而促进土地改革目标的实现。关键词:对立统一、土地改革、土地银行
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信