Unsupervised Image Segmentation Parameters Evaluation for Urban Land Use/Land Cover Applications

Geomatics Pub Date : 2024-05-12 DOI:10.3390/geomatics4020009
G. B. Ikokou, Kate Miranda Malale
{"title":"Unsupervised Image Segmentation Parameters Evaluation for Urban Land Use/Land Cover Applications","authors":"G. B. Ikokou, Kate Miranda Malale","doi":"10.3390/geomatics4020009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Image segmentation plays an important role in object-based classification. An optimal image segmentation should result in objects being internally homogeneous and, at the same time, distinct from one another. Strategies that assess the quality of image segmentation through intra- and inter-segment homogeneity metrics cannot always predict possible under- and over-segmentations of the image. Although the segmentation scale parameter determines the size of the image segments, it cannot synchronously guarantee that the produced image segments are internally homogeneous and spatially distinct from their neighbors. The majority of image segmentation assessment methods largely rely on a spatial autocorrelation measure that makes the global objective function fluctuate irregularly, resulting in the image variance increasing drastically toward the end of the segmentation. This paper relied on a series of image segmentations to test a more stable image variance measure based on the standard deviation model as well as a more robust hybrid spatial autocorrelation measure based on the current Moran’s index and the spatial autocorrelation coefficient models. The results show that there is a positive and inversely proportional correlation between the inter-segment heterogeneity and the intra-segment homogeneity since the global heterogeneity measure increases with a decrease in the image variance measure. It was also found that medium-scale parameters produced better quality image segments when used with small color weights, while large-scale parameters produced good quality segments when used with large color factor weights. Moreover, with optimal segmentation parameters, the image autocorrelation measure stabilizes and follows a near horizontal fluctuation while the image variance drops to values very close to zero, preventing the heterogeneity function from fluctuating irregularly towards the end of the image segmentation process.","PeriodicalId":507594,"journal":{"name":"Geomatics","volume":"116 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geomatics4020009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Image segmentation plays an important role in object-based classification. An optimal image segmentation should result in objects being internally homogeneous and, at the same time, distinct from one another. Strategies that assess the quality of image segmentation through intra- and inter-segment homogeneity metrics cannot always predict possible under- and over-segmentations of the image. Although the segmentation scale parameter determines the size of the image segments, it cannot synchronously guarantee that the produced image segments are internally homogeneous and spatially distinct from their neighbors. The majority of image segmentation assessment methods largely rely on a spatial autocorrelation measure that makes the global objective function fluctuate irregularly, resulting in the image variance increasing drastically toward the end of the segmentation. This paper relied on a series of image segmentations to test a more stable image variance measure based on the standard deviation model as well as a more robust hybrid spatial autocorrelation measure based on the current Moran’s index and the spatial autocorrelation coefficient models. The results show that there is a positive and inversely proportional correlation between the inter-segment heterogeneity and the intra-segment homogeneity since the global heterogeneity measure increases with a decrease in the image variance measure. It was also found that medium-scale parameters produced better quality image segments when used with small color weights, while large-scale parameters produced good quality segments when used with large color factor weights. Moreover, with optimal segmentation parameters, the image autocorrelation measure stabilizes and follows a near horizontal fluctuation while the image variance drops to values very close to zero, preventing the heterogeneity function from fluctuating irregularly towards the end of the image segmentation process.
用于城市土地利用/土地覆盖应用的无监督图像分割参数评估
图像分割在基于物体的分类中发挥着重要作用。最佳的图像分割应使物体内部同质,同时又彼此不同。通过片段内和片段间的同质性指标来评估图像分割质量的策略并不能总是预测图像可能出现的分割不足和分割过度。虽然分割比例参数决定了图像片段的大小,但它不能同步保证生成的图像片段在内部是同质的,在空间上与相邻的片段是不同的。大多数图像分割评估方法主要依赖于空间自相关测量,这种测量方法会使全局目标函数无规则波动,导致图像方差在分割结束时急剧增大。本文通过一系列图像分割,测试了基于标准偏差模型的更稳定的图像方差测量方法,以及基于当前莫兰指数和空间自相关系数模型的更稳健的混合空间自相关测量方法。结果表明,由于全局异质性度量随图像方差度量的减小而增加,因此片段间异质性和片段内同质性之间存在正反比例相关关系。研究还发现,当使用较小的颜色权重时,中等尺度参数能生成质量较好的图像片段,而当使用较大的颜色因子权重时,大规模参数能生成质量较好的片段。此外,在使用最佳分割参数时,图像自相关度会趋于稳定,呈近似水平的波动,而图像方差则会下降到非常接近零的值,从而防止异质性函数在图像分割过程即将结束时出现不规则波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信