TOLERANT AND INTOLERANT CONTENT OF ASSESSMENTS BY UKRAINIAN STUDENTS OF SUBJECTS SOCIAL AND POLITICAL LIFE

{"title":"TOLERANT AND INTOLERANT CONTENT OF ASSESSMENTS BY UKRAINIAN STUDENTS OF SUBJECTS SOCIAL AND POLITICAL LIFE","authors":"","doi":"10.37096/shdisj-23-1.2-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. The study focuses on the problem of the attitude of Ukrainians to \"good Russians\" under the influence of the Russia-Ukraine war. The opinion of student youth is of particular importance. Depending on the holding of a certain personal position, young respondents largely evaluate modern military and political phenomena and processes.\nMethodology. The task of the online survey of 2,202 students of 35 universities from different regions of Ukraine, conducted in the spring of 2022, was to assess the degree of guilt and effectiveness of the actions of agents of social, in particular, military and political processes. The questionnaire used 5-point scales of semantic differential and subjective scaling. According to the content of the evaluations of the crimes of the Russians and the Russian authorities before Ukrainians, four groups of respondents were distinguished. Their attitudes towards various social and ethno-political subjects are compared.\nResults. It was found that anti-Russian attitudes significantly prevail in students' evaluations of Russians and the Russian government. A relatively small part of the sample consisted of anti-Ukrainian, neutral and tolerant views towards Russians. The anti-Russian majority most clearly accuses subjects to whom it attributes signs of attraction to the \"Russian world\". The anti-Ukrainian minority evaluates them positively, but tends to blame Ukrainian society and the Ukrainian authorities. However, the positions of the anti-Russian majority and the anti-Ukrainian minority turned out to be close in their high assessment of the effectiveness of the Ukrainian government and the command of the Armed Forces. Respondents who try to choose neutral assessments partly avoid a clear choice, and partly hide their pro-Russian sentiments. \"Tolerant\" respondents, who condemn the Russian authorities, but do not condemn Russians, tend to blame all those in power and to excuse \"ordinary people\" regardless of their nationality or citizenship.","PeriodicalId":149585,"journal":{"name":"Socialization & Human Development: International Scientific Journal","volume":"121 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialization & Human Development: International Scientific Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37096/shdisj-23-1.2-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. The study focuses on the problem of the attitude of Ukrainians to "good Russians" under the influence of the Russia-Ukraine war. The opinion of student youth is of particular importance. Depending on the holding of a certain personal position, young respondents largely evaluate modern military and political phenomena and processes. Methodology. The task of the online survey of 2,202 students of 35 universities from different regions of Ukraine, conducted in the spring of 2022, was to assess the degree of guilt and effectiveness of the actions of agents of social, in particular, military and political processes. The questionnaire used 5-point scales of semantic differential and subjective scaling. According to the content of the evaluations of the crimes of the Russians and the Russian authorities before Ukrainians, four groups of respondents were distinguished. Their attitudes towards various social and ethno-political subjects are compared. Results. It was found that anti-Russian attitudes significantly prevail in students' evaluations of Russians and the Russian government. A relatively small part of the sample consisted of anti-Ukrainian, neutral and tolerant views towards Russians. The anti-Russian majority most clearly accuses subjects to whom it attributes signs of attraction to the "Russian world". The anti-Ukrainian minority evaluates them positively, but tends to blame Ukrainian society and the Ukrainian authorities. However, the positions of the anti-Russian majority and the anti-Ukrainian minority turned out to be close in their high assessment of the effectiveness of the Ukrainian government and the command of the Armed Forces. Respondents who try to choose neutral assessments partly avoid a clear choice, and partly hide their pro-Russian sentiments. "Tolerant" respondents, who condemn the Russian authorities, but do not condemn Russians, tend to blame all those in power and to excuse "ordinary people" regardless of their nationality or citizenship.
乌克兰学生对社会和政治生活科目评估的宽容和不宽容内容
相关性。本研究重点关注俄乌战争影响下乌克兰人对 "好俄罗斯人 "的态度问题。青年学生的意见尤为重要。根据个人立场的不同,青年受访者在很大程度上会对现代军事和政治现象及进程作出评价。2022 年春季对乌克兰不同地区 35 所大学的 2 202 名学生进行了在线调查,其任务是评估社会(尤其是军事和政治进程)代理人行为的罪责程度和有效性。问卷采用了 5 点语义差异量表和主观量表。根据对俄罗斯人和俄罗斯当局在乌克兰人面前所犯罪行的评价内容,将受访者分为四组。对他们对各种社会和民族政治主题的态度进行了比较。结果发现,在学生对俄罗斯人和俄罗斯政府的评价中,反俄态度明显占主导地位。样本中相对较小一部分人对俄罗斯人持反乌克兰、中立和宽容的态度。反俄的多数人最明显地指责那些被他们认为有被 "俄罗斯世界 "吸引迹象的人。反乌克兰的少数人对他们持积极评价,但往往指责乌克兰社会和乌克兰当局。然而,反俄多数派和反乌少数派在高度评价乌克兰政府和武装力量指挥部的效率方面立场接近。试图选择中立评价的受访者部分避免了明确的选择,部分隐藏了自己的亲俄情绪。"宽容 "的受访者谴责俄罗斯当局,但不谴责俄罗斯人,他们倾向于指责所有当权者,并为 "普通人 "开脱,不论其国籍或公民身份如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信