ESG Performance and Corporate Default Risk: Do Countries’ Shareholder Protection Levels Affect This Relationship?

Abstract

This paper explores the nexus between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and corporate default risk. Employing a panel dataset from 1,094 non-financial companies in 21 nations in Europe, corresponding to 9,522 firm-year observations, and using fixed effects estimations, we empirically demonstrate that corporations with higher ESG scores tend to have lower firm default risk. Among the three categories of the ESG score, both the social and the environmental categories participate in this significant association. Moreover, our study presents novel evidence that within ESGs’ ten subcategories, resource use, product responsibility, emissions, human rights, workforce, and CSR strategy significantly reduce firm default risk. Furthermore, country-level shareholder protection moderates the linkage between default risk and ESG performance, such that the negative impact of ESG on default risk is lower for corporations located in nations with higher shareholder protection. Hence, if the countries’ shareholder protection levels are high, stronger ESG would decrease firm default risk by a lesser amount than countries with lower shareholder protection levels. Our findings are robust to alternate variable measurements and alternate methodologies, capturing endogeneity issues.