Teaching Artificial Intelligence Good Air Traffic Flow Management

Q2 Social Sciences
Christine Taylor, Erik Vargo, Tyler Manderfield, Simon Heitin
{"title":"Teaching Artificial Intelligence Good Air Traffic Flow Management","authors":"Christine Taylor, Erik Vargo, Tyler Manderfield, Simon Heitin","doi":"10.2514/1.d0414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Air traffic flow managers are continually faced with the decision of when and how to respond to predictions of future constraints. The promise of artificial intelligence, and specifically reinforcement learning, to provide decision support in this domain stems from the ability to systematically evaluate a sequence of potential actions, or strategy, across a range of uncertain futures. As decision support for human traffic managers, the generated recommendations must embody characteristics of a good management strategy; doing so requires introducing such notions to the algorithm. This paper proposes inducing stability into the strategy by dynamically constraining the design space based on upstream design decisions to promote consistency in the recommendations over time, where two such constraint sets are considered. The paper further evaluates the impact of adding a performance improvement threshold that must be overcome to accept a new strategy recommendation. The combination of search constraints and threshold values is evaluated against the agent’s reward function in addition to measures proposed to capture the stability of the strategy. The results show that the more restrictive set of constraints yields the best performance in terms of strategy stability and is more likely to reduce the delay where implementation of the threshold has a minor impact on overall performance. However, for the highest impact day of 8 June 2018, applying the threshold reverses the performance gains in delay but dramatically improves the stability of the resulting traffic flow management strategy from a flight level perspective, implying a potential tradeoff between delay optimization and flight predictability.","PeriodicalId":36984,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Air Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Air Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.d0414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Air traffic flow managers are continually faced with the decision of when and how to respond to predictions of future constraints. The promise of artificial intelligence, and specifically reinforcement learning, to provide decision support in this domain stems from the ability to systematically evaluate a sequence of potential actions, or strategy, across a range of uncertain futures. As decision support for human traffic managers, the generated recommendations must embody characteristics of a good management strategy; doing so requires introducing such notions to the algorithm. This paper proposes inducing stability into the strategy by dynamically constraining the design space based on upstream design decisions to promote consistency in the recommendations over time, where two such constraint sets are considered. The paper further evaluates the impact of adding a performance improvement threshold that must be overcome to accept a new strategy recommendation. The combination of search constraints and threshold values is evaluated against the agent’s reward function in addition to measures proposed to capture the stability of the strategy. The results show that the more restrictive set of constraints yields the best performance in terms of strategy stability and is more likely to reduce the delay where implementation of the threshold has a minor impact on overall performance. However, for the highest impact day of 8 June 2018, applying the threshold reverses the performance gains in delay but dramatically improves the stability of the resulting traffic flow management strategy from a flight level perspective, implying a potential tradeoff between delay optimization and flight predictability.
教人工智能做好空中交通流量管理
空中交通流量管理人员一直面临着何时以及如何应对未来限制因素预测的决策问题。人工智能,特别是强化学习,之所以能够在这一领域提供决策支持,是因为它能够在一系列不确定的未来中系统地评估一系列潜在的行动或策略。作为对人类交通管理人员的决策支持,生成的建议必须体现良好管理策略的特征;要做到这一点,就需要在算法中引入此类概念。本文建议根据上游设计决策对设计空间进行动态限制,从而在策略中引入稳定性,以促进建议的长期一致性。本文进一步评估了添加性能改进阈值的影响,要接受新的策略建议,必须克服该阈值。除了为捕捉策略稳定性而提出的措施外,还根据代理的奖励函数对搜索限制和阈值的组合进行了评估。结果表明,在策略稳定性方面,限制性更强的约束条件集性能最佳,更有可能减少延迟,而阈值的实施对整体性能的影响较小。然而,对于 2018 年 6 月 8 日这一影响最大的日子,应用阈值会逆转延迟方面的性能增益,但从飞行水平的角度来看,会显著提高由此产生的交通流管理策略的稳定性,这意味着延迟优化和飞行可预测性之间可能存在权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Air Transportation
Journal of Air Transportation Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信