Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence

Severiano Tiberi, Joseph I. Esformes, George Jennings, Steve Cooper, Jeremy Moody
{"title":"Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence","authors":"Severiano Tiberi, Joseph I. Esformes, George Jennings, Steve Cooper, Jeremy Moody","doi":"10.58524/002024336600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To explore collegiate student-athletes? preferences of coaching leadership behaviours in strength and conditioning (SC) coaching and evaluate differences between the preferences of coaching leadership behaviours based on task dependence. Method a total of 145 National Collegiate Athletic Association student-athletes (independent sports athletes = 48, interdependent sports athletes = 97), aged 18-25 years, with a mean = 3 (SD = ±1) SC sessions per week, participated. Participants completed an electronic questionnaire involving the athletes? preference version of the Revised Leadership Scale for SC. Results summary statistics revealed that the most favoured behaviour was 'training and instruction', median = 4.5 (IQR = 1.0), while the least favoured was ?autocratic?, median = 2.0 (IQR = 0.5). Independent sports athletes preferred training and instruction more (median = 5.0, IQR = 0.6) than interdependent sports athletes (median = 4.5, IQR = 1.0). Interdependent sports athletes preferred social support more (median = 3.5, IQR = 1.0) than independent sports athletes (median = 3.0, IQR = 0.6). The observation of a marginal statistically significant difference for social support suggests task-dependence-based variations (p = 0.018). However, small effect sizes indicate that differences are not practically significant. Conclusion and recommendation: this study presents insights into the preferences of coaching leadership behaviours among student-athletes in SC coaching. It highlights key behaviours such as training and instruction, positive feedback, situational considerations, and social support. These findings inform coaching practice and provide a foundation for further research into coaching leadership behaviours in SC coaching.","PeriodicalId":476163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Coaching and Sports Science","volume":"120 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Coaching and Sports Science","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58524/002024336600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore collegiate student-athletes? preferences of coaching leadership behaviours in strength and conditioning (SC) coaching and evaluate differences between the preferences of coaching leadership behaviours based on task dependence. Method a total of 145 National Collegiate Athletic Association student-athletes (independent sports athletes = 48, interdependent sports athletes = 97), aged 18-25 years, with a mean = 3 (SD = ±1) SC sessions per week, participated. Participants completed an electronic questionnaire involving the athletes? preference version of the Revised Leadership Scale for SC. Results summary statistics revealed that the most favoured behaviour was 'training and instruction', median = 4.5 (IQR = 1.0), while the least favoured was ?autocratic?, median = 2.0 (IQR = 0.5). Independent sports athletes preferred training and instruction more (median = 5.0, IQR = 0.6) than interdependent sports athletes (median = 4.5, IQR = 1.0). Interdependent sports athletes preferred social support more (median = 3.5, IQR = 1.0) than independent sports athletes (median = 3.0, IQR = 0.6). The observation of a marginal statistically significant difference for social support suggests task-dependence-based variations (p = 0.018). However, small effect sizes indicate that differences are not practically significant. Conclusion and recommendation: this study presents insights into the preferences of coaching leadership behaviours among student-athletes in SC coaching. It highlights key behaviours such as training and instruction, positive feedback, situational considerations, and social support. These findings inform coaching practice and provide a foundation for further research into coaching leadership behaviours in SC coaching.
探究力量与体能教练中的教练领导行为:基于任务依赖性的 NCAA 一级和二级大学学生运动员偏好
目的 探讨大学生运动员在力量与体能(SC)教练中对教练领导行为的偏好,并评估基于任务依赖性的教练领导行为偏好之间的差异。方法 共有 145 名全国大学生体育协会的学生运动员(独立运动项目运动员 = 48 人,相互依赖运动项目运动员 = 97 人)参加,他们的年龄在 18-25 岁之间,平均每周进行 3 次(SD = ±1)力量与体能训练。参与者填写了一份电子问卷,其中包括运动员对 SC 领导力修订量表的偏好版本。结果汇总统计显示,最受欢迎的行为是 "训练和指导",中位数=4.5(IQR=1.0),而最不受欢迎的行为是 "专制",中位数=2.0(IQR=0.5)。独立型体育运动员比相互依赖型体育运动员更喜欢训练和指导(中位数=5.0,IQR=0.6)(中位数=4.5,IQR=1.0)。相互依赖型体育运动员比独立型体育运动员(中位数=3.0,IQR=0.6)更喜欢社会支持(中位数=3.5,IQR=1.0)。在社会支持方面观察到的微弱统计学显著差异表明了基于任务依赖性的差异(p = 0.018)。然而,较小的效应大小表明差异并不具有实际意义。结论和建议:本研究深入分析了 SC 教练中学生运动员对教练领导行为的偏好。它强调了培训和指导、积极反馈、情境考虑和社会支持等关键行为。这些发现为教练实践提供了参考,并为进一步研究 SC 教练中的教练领导行为奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信