Assessing Mental Health and Psychological Wellbeing in Medical Students: A Systematic Review

Aisha Ali Hawsawi, Neil Nixon, Alice Derbyshire, Elena Nixon
{"title":"Assessing Mental Health and Psychological Wellbeing in Medical Students: A Systematic Review","authors":"Aisha Ali Hawsawi, Neil Nixon, Alice Derbyshire, Elena Nixon","doi":"10.33422/ejbs.v7i1.1248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical students' psychological wellbeing is a growing concern. However, the methods used and outcomes measured in studies evaluating psychological wellbeing lack consistency given their wide and diverse array. This systematic review aims to characterise and comprehensively evaluate the outcomes measured and methods used in studies assessing psychological wellbeing among medical students. A consensus on the constructs and methods used in indexing psychological wellbeing can lead to more effective assessments and consequently more effective interventions aimed at promoting wellbeing in medical students. Methods: Multiple databases were searched, including Medline, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Grey literature was searched through Google Scholar, and reference lists of the included studies were further searched. Results: Forty-five studies were included, and findings were integrated into a narrative synthesis. The results showed that various methods were used and various outcomes were measured to index medical students’ mental wellbeing; outcomes tapped on stress, depression, anxiety, burnout, and minor psychiatric disorders as wellbeing indicators while commonly used measures were the General Health Questionnaire, Oldenburg Burnout Inventory, Perceived Stress Scale and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale. Self-reported measures and quantitative designs predominated, focusing on negative indicators of wellbeing. The findings of this systematic review highlighted the vast heterogeneity in outcomes measured and methods used in studies assessing psychological wellbeing in medical students. Conclusions: Homogeneity in the measures and outcomes used to assess wellbeing is necessary to improve the comparability and reliability of findings among studies. Future research should also use validated measures that capture both positive and negative aspects of psychological wellbeing to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the factors that can promote positive psychological wellbeing; and consequently, to inform the development of more effective interventions tailored to the mental health needs of medical students.","PeriodicalId":472493,"journal":{"name":"European journal of behavioral sciences","volume":"58 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of behavioral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/ejbs.v7i1.1248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical students' psychological wellbeing is a growing concern. However, the methods used and outcomes measured in studies evaluating psychological wellbeing lack consistency given their wide and diverse array. This systematic review aims to characterise and comprehensively evaluate the outcomes measured and methods used in studies assessing psychological wellbeing among medical students. A consensus on the constructs and methods used in indexing psychological wellbeing can lead to more effective assessments and consequently more effective interventions aimed at promoting wellbeing in medical students. Methods: Multiple databases were searched, including Medline, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Grey literature was searched through Google Scholar, and reference lists of the included studies were further searched. Results: Forty-five studies were included, and findings were integrated into a narrative synthesis. The results showed that various methods were used and various outcomes were measured to index medical students’ mental wellbeing; outcomes tapped on stress, depression, anxiety, burnout, and minor psychiatric disorders as wellbeing indicators while commonly used measures were the General Health Questionnaire, Oldenburg Burnout Inventory, Perceived Stress Scale and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale. Self-reported measures and quantitative designs predominated, focusing on negative indicators of wellbeing. The findings of this systematic review highlighted the vast heterogeneity in outcomes measured and methods used in studies assessing psychological wellbeing in medical students. Conclusions: Homogeneity in the measures and outcomes used to assess wellbeing is necessary to improve the comparability and reliability of findings among studies. Future research should also use validated measures that capture both positive and negative aspects of psychological wellbeing to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the factors that can promote positive psychological wellbeing; and consequently, to inform the development of more effective interventions tailored to the mental health needs of medical students.
评估医学生的心理健康和心理福祉:系统回顾
医学生的心理健康日益受到关注。然而,由于心理健康评估研究的广泛性和多样性,其使用的方法和测量的结果缺乏一致性。本系统性综述旨在描述和全面评估医学生心理健康评估研究中测量的结果和使用的方法。就心理健康指数的概念和方法达成共识,可提高评估的有效性,从而采取更有效的干预措施,提高医学生的心理健康水平。方法:检索了多个数据库,包括 Medline、PsycINFO、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science。通过谷歌学术搜索灰色文献,并进一步搜索纳入研究的参考文献目录。结果共纳入了 45 项研究,并将研究结果进行了叙述性综合。结果表明,医学生的心理健康指数采用了各种方法,测量了各种结果;结果以压力、抑郁、焦虑、职业倦怠和轻微精神障碍为健康指标,常用的测量方法有一般健康问卷、奥登堡职业倦怠量表、感知压力量表和抑郁焦虑压力量表。自我报告的测量方法和定量设计占主导地位,重点关注幸福感的负面指标。本系统综述的研究结果突出表明,在评估医学生心理健康的研究中,所测量的结果和所使用的方法存在巨大差异。结论为了提高研究结果的可比性和可靠性,评估幸福感所使用的测量方法和结果必须具有同质性。未来的研究还应该使用经过验证的测量方法,同时捕捉心理健康的积极和消极方面,以便更全面地了解促进积极心理健康的因素;从而为制定更有效的干预措施提供信息,以满足医学生的心理健康需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信