Polymicrobial Conditions Affect Antibiotic Susceptibility in Clinically Relevant Bacterial Species

Fine focus Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.33043/ff.10.1.74-89
William Little, Andrea Lopez, Eleanna Carris, Allie Smith
{"title":"Polymicrobial Conditions Affect Antibiotic Susceptibility in Clinically Relevant Bacterial Species","authors":"William Little, Andrea Lopez, Eleanna Carris, Allie Smith","doi":"10.33043/ff.10.1.74-89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic wounds, defined as those which remain open and inflamed for greater than six weeks, are a major area of clinical concern. Resulting in thousands of amputations per year and billions of dollars spent globally in treatment, chronic wounds are notoriously difficult to successfully treat. Two hallmarks of chronic wounds are that they are thought to harbor biofilm-associated bacteria and tend to be polymicrobial. While the research literature has repeatedly demonstrated the effects of biofilms on wound persistence and the changes to the efficacy of antibiotics, few studies have demonstrated what effect the polymicrobial condition has on the antibiotic tolerance of bacteria. To further explore this, four species of clinically relevant wound pathogens (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumanii, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis) were tested in mono- and polymicrobial conditions using the current gold-standard clinical methods for determining antibiotic susceptibility. Noticeable differences in antibiotic tolerance were observed in the polymicrobial condition, including both increased and decreased susceptibility, depending on the antibiotic used. Our data demonstrate that the current clinical methods used for testing antibiotic susceptibility can generate results that are not representative of the infection environment, which may contribute to treatment failure and persistence of polymicrobial infections.","PeriodicalId":87255,"journal":{"name":"Fine focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fine focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33043/ff.10.1.74-89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic wounds, defined as those which remain open and inflamed for greater than six weeks, are a major area of clinical concern. Resulting in thousands of amputations per year and billions of dollars spent globally in treatment, chronic wounds are notoriously difficult to successfully treat. Two hallmarks of chronic wounds are that they are thought to harbor biofilm-associated bacteria and tend to be polymicrobial. While the research literature has repeatedly demonstrated the effects of biofilms on wound persistence and the changes to the efficacy of antibiotics, few studies have demonstrated what effect the polymicrobial condition has on the antibiotic tolerance of bacteria. To further explore this, four species of clinically relevant wound pathogens (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumanii, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis) were tested in mono- and polymicrobial conditions using the current gold-standard clinical methods for determining antibiotic susceptibility. Noticeable differences in antibiotic tolerance were observed in the polymicrobial condition, including both increased and decreased susceptibility, depending on the antibiotic used. Our data demonstrate that the current clinical methods used for testing antibiotic susceptibility can generate results that are not representative of the infection environment, which may contribute to treatment failure and persistence of polymicrobial infections.
多微生物条件影响临床相关菌种的抗生素敏感性
慢性伤口是指伤口开放和愈合时间超过六周的伤口,是临床关注的一个主要领域。慢性伤口每年导致成千上万人截肢,全球治疗费用高达数十亿美元。慢性伤口有两个特点,一是被认为会滋生生物相关细菌,二是倾向于多微生物感染。虽然研究文献反复证明了生物膜对伤口持久性的影响以及对抗生素有效性的改变,但很少有研究证明多菌情况对细菌的抗生素耐受性有什么影响。为了进一步探讨这一问题,研究人员采用目前确定抗生素敏感性的金标准临床方法,在单菌和多菌条件下对四种临床相关伤口病原体(铜绿假单胞菌、鲍曼不动杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和粪肠球菌)进行了测试。在多微生物条件下,抗生素耐受性出现了明显的差异,包括敏感性的增加和降低,这取决于所使用的抗生素。我们的数据表明,目前用于检测抗生素敏感性的临床方法所得出的结果不能代表感染环境,这可能会导致治疗失败和多微生物感染的持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信