A Survey of the Relationship Between Dietary Quality and Metabolic Syndrome

Alireaz Mohtashami
{"title":"A Survey of the Relationship Between Dietary Quality and Metabolic Syndrome","authors":"Alireaz Mohtashami","doi":"10.2174/0115734013293659240430164357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nDietary intake is increasingly recognized as a pivotal factor in the etiology\nof metabolic syndrome. A substantial body of evidence suggests a discernible correlation between\ndietary quality indices and the occurrence of metabolic syndrome.\n\n\n\nThis survey seeks to rigorously evaluate the impact of diet quality indices and demographic\nvariables on the manifestation of metabolic syndrome.\n\n\n\nThe aim of this study was the evaluation of effects of dietary quality indices on metabolic syndrome in beside of demographic factors.\n\n\n\nThis case-control study encompassed 175 individuals diagnosed with\nmetabolic syndrome and an equal number of age-matched healthy counterparts (Comprising both\ngenderS) aged between 20 and 65 years. Participants were sourced from diverse laboratories and\nthe general population in Chalous, northern Iran. Dietary intake data were meticulously acquired\nusing a comprehensive Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). Furthermore, dietary quality indices,\nspecifically the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), Dietary Diversity Score (DDS), Nutrient Adequacy\nRatio (NAR), and Mean Adequacy Ratio (MAR), were meticulously evaluated employing\nstandardized methodologies.\n\n\n\nThere was no significant diversity in the likelihood of developing metabolic syndrome\nconcerning the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), Nutrient Adequacy Ratio (NAR), and Mean Adequacy\nRatio (MAR) when comparing quartile 4 (Maximum scorE) to quartile 1 (Minimum scorE).\nHowever, this likelihood diminished following adjustments for confounding variables, including\nage, sex, dietary energy, education, job, and marital status. In the case of the Dietary Diversity\nScore (DDS), there was an observed difference in morbidity likelihood between quartile 4 and\nquartile 1. Nevertheless, after meticulous adjustment for confounding variables, this difference\nfailed to reach statistical significance. No substantial variations (P ≥ 0.05) were detected in the\nodds ratio across quartiles and models (P trenD) for all dietary quality indices.\n\n\n\nNo significant associations were identified between dietary quality indices and the occurrence\nof metabolic syndrome.\n\n\n\n-\n","PeriodicalId":130655,"journal":{"name":"Current Nutrition & Food Science","volume":"78 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Nutrition & Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734013293659240430164357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dietary intake is increasingly recognized as a pivotal factor in the etiology of metabolic syndrome. A substantial body of evidence suggests a discernible correlation between dietary quality indices and the occurrence of metabolic syndrome. This survey seeks to rigorously evaluate the impact of diet quality indices and demographic variables on the manifestation of metabolic syndrome. The aim of this study was the evaluation of effects of dietary quality indices on metabolic syndrome in beside of demographic factors. This case-control study encompassed 175 individuals diagnosed with metabolic syndrome and an equal number of age-matched healthy counterparts (Comprising both genderS) aged between 20 and 65 years. Participants were sourced from diverse laboratories and the general population in Chalous, northern Iran. Dietary intake data were meticulously acquired using a comprehensive Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). Furthermore, dietary quality indices, specifically the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), Dietary Diversity Score (DDS), Nutrient Adequacy Ratio (NAR), and Mean Adequacy Ratio (MAR), were meticulously evaluated employing standardized methodologies. There was no significant diversity in the likelihood of developing metabolic syndrome concerning the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), Nutrient Adequacy Ratio (NAR), and Mean Adequacy Ratio (MAR) when comparing quartile 4 (Maximum scorE) to quartile 1 (Minimum scorE). However, this likelihood diminished following adjustments for confounding variables, including age, sex, dietary energy, education, job, and marital status. In the case of the Dietary Diversity Score (DDS), there was an observed difference in morbidity likelihood between quartile 4 and quartile 1. Nevertheless, after meticulous adjustment for confounding variables, this difference failed to reach statistical significance. No substantial variations (P ≥ 0.05) were detected in the odds ratio across quartiles and models (P trenD) for all dietary quality indices. No significant associations were identified between dietary quality indices and the occurrence of metabolic syndrome. -
膳食质量与代谢综合征之间关系的调查
人们越来越认识到,膳食摄入量是代谢综合征病因中的一个关键因素。大量证据表明,膳食质量指数与代谢综合征的发生之间存在明显的相关性。本调查旨在严格评估膳食质量指数和人口统计学变量对代谢综合征表现的影响。这项病例对照研究包括 175 名被诊断患有代谢综合征的人和同等数量的年龄在 20 岁至 65 岁之间的健康人(包括男女两性)。参与者来自伊朗北部 Chalous 的不同实验室和普通人群。膳食摄入数据是通过全面的食物频率问卷(FFQ)精心采集的。此外,还采用标准化方法对膳食质量指数,特别是健康饮食指数(HEI)、膳食多样性评分(DDS)、营养素充足率(NAR)和平均充足率(MAR)进行了细致评估。将四分位数 4(最高评分 E)与四分位数 1(最低评分 E)进行比较,在健康饮食指数(HEI)、营养素充足率(NAR)和平均充足率(MAR)方面,患代谢综合征的可能性没有明显差异。就膳食多样性评分(DDS)而言,在四分位数 4 和四分位数 1 之间观察到了发病可能性的差异。然而,在对混杂变量进行细致调整后,这一差异未能达到统计学意义。所有膳食质量指数在不同四分位数和不同模型之间的比率均无显著差异(P ≥ 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信