Reflections of including key audit matters in the audit quality and audit fees of publicly traded companies in Brazil

Priscila dos Santos Fernandes Melo, Bruno Meirelles Salotti, G. Braunbeck, Raquel Sales da Silva Costa
{"title":"Reflections of including key audit matters in the audit quality and audit fees of publicly traded companies in Brazil","authors":"Priscila dos Santos Fernandes Melo, Bruno Meirelles Salotti, G. Braunbeck, Raquel Sales da Silva Costa","doi":"10.16930/2237-7662202434182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering the context of the changes implemented by the revised ISA 700, which required including items such as Key Audit Matters (KAMs), this article aimed to examine the effects of the changes in ISA 700 on audit quality and fees. Accounting and market data, information on the responsible audit firms, and the number of KAMs disclosed by publicly traded companies in Brazil were collected from 2014 to 2017. Overall, the results did not demonstrate evidence of improvement in audit quality after adopting the revised ISA 700. Audit fees also did not show statistically significant changes when comparing the period before and after adopting the new requirement. So, the study concluded that, during the four-year period surrounding the adoption of the new requirements, there was no evidence of an increase in audit quality or auditor fees for publicly traded companies in Brazil. This article expands academic discussions in the Brazilian capital market regarding the implications of including KAMs in audit reports, as well as the analysis of the practical effects of applying standards issued by regulatory bodies.","PeriodicalId":516890,"journal":{"name":"Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil","volume":"20 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-7662202434182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the context of the changes implemented by the revised ISA 700, which required including items such as Key Audit Matters (KAMs), this article aimed to examine the effects of the changes in ISA 700 on audit quality and fees. Accounting and market data, information on the responsible audit firms, and the number of KAMs disclosed by publicly traded companies in Brazil were collected from 2014 to 2017. Overall, the results did not demonstrate evidence of improvement in audit quality after adopting the revised ISA 700. Audit fees also did not show statistically significant changes when comparing the period before and after adopting the new requirement. So, the study concluded that, during the four-year period surrounding the adoption of the new requirements, there was no evidence of an increase in audit quality or auditor fees for publicly traded companies in Brazil. This article expands academic discussions in the Brazilian capital market regarding the implications of including KAMs in audit reports, as well as the analysis of the practical effects of applying standards issued by regulatory bodies.
将关键审计事项纳入巴西上市公司审计质量和审计费用的思考
考虑到修订后的《国际审计准则》第 700 条所实施的变化,其中要求包括关键审计事项(KAMs)等项目,本文旨在研究《国际审计准则》第 700 条的变化对审计质量和费用的影响。本文收集了 2014 年至 2017 年巴西上市公司披露的会计和市场数据、负责审计的事务所信息以及关键审计事项的数量。总体而言,结果并未显示出采用修订后的《国际审计准则》第700条后审计质量有所提高的证据。审计费用在采用新要求前后的比较中也未显示出统计学上的显著变化。因此,研究得出结论,在采用新要求前后的四年期间,没有证据表明巴西上市公司的审计质量或审计费用有所提高。这篇文章拓展了巴西资本市场关于将 KAM 纳入审计报告的影响的学术讨论,以及对应用监管机构发布的标准的实际效果的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信