Functional and Clinical outcomes of total hip replacement surgery via Lateral approach

S. rehman, Shah Fahad Qayyum, Hamza Khan, Azeem Khan, Muhammad Aamir
{"title":"Functional and Clinical outcomes of total hip replacement surgery via Lateral approach","authors":"S. rehman, Shah Fahad Qayyum, Hamza Khan, Azeem Khan, Muhammad Aamir","doi":"10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a critical surgical intervention for patients with severe hip dysfunction primarily due to conditions such as osteoarthritis, trauma, and other degenerative diseases. The choice of surgical approach can significantly influence the outcomes of the procedure, including postoperative recovery, pain management, and functional mobility.\nObjective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of the lateral approach in total hip replacement, comparing its efficacy and safety with other surgical techniques.\nMethods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single medical teaching institution, involving 74 patients who underwent total hip replacement using the lateral approach between January 2022 and December 2023. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes. Key measures included the Harris Hip Score (HHS), rates of postoperative pain, limb length discrepancy (LLD), and complications such as dislocation and infection. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25, with a significance threshold set at P < 0.05.\nResults: The study population had an equal distribution of male and female patients, with an average age of 57.20 years (SD ± 14.68). Trauma was the most common indication for surgery (67.6%), followed by osteoarthritis (18.9%) and avascular necrosis (9.5%). Postoperative evaluation showed that 62.26% of patients achieved an 'excellent' HHS at two weeks, while 28.38% were rated as 'good'. The overall complication rate was low, with dislocation occurring in 4.1% of cases. Pain was reported in 12.2% of patients post-surgery.\nConclusion: The lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty provides effective pain relief and functional recovery with a low complication rate. This study supports the continued use of the lateral approach as a viable option for hip replacement surgery, showing comparable or superior outcomes to other surgical approaches.","PeriodicalId":507812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a critical surgical intervention for patients with severe hip dysfunction primarily due to conditions such as osteoarthritis, trauma, and other degenerative diseases. The choice of surgical approach can significantly influence the outcomes of the procedure, including postoperative recovery, pain management, and functional mobility. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of the lateral approach in total hip replacement, comparing its efficacy and safety with other surgical techniques. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single medical teaching institution, involving 74 patients who underwent total hip replacement using the lateral approach between January 2022 and December 2023. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes. Key measures included the Harris Hip Score (HHS), rates of postoperative pain, limb length discrepancy (LLD), and complications such as dislocation and infection. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25, with a significance threshold set at P < 0.05. Results: The study population had an equal distribution of male and female patients, with an average age of 57.20 years (SD ± 14.68). Trauma was the most common indication for surgery (67.6%), followed by osteoarthritis (18.9%) and avascular necrosis (9.5%). Postoperative evaluation showed that 62.26% of patients achieved an 'excellent' HHS at two weeks, while 28.38% were rated as 'good'. The overall complication rate was low, with dislocation occurring in 4.1% of cases. Pain was reported in 12.2% of patients post-surgery. Conclusion: The lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty provides effective pain relief and functional recovery with a low complication rate. This study supports the continued use of the lateral approach as a viable option for hip replacement surgery, showing comparable or superior outcomes to other surgical approaches.
外侧入路全髋关节置换手术的功能和临床疗效
背景:全髋关节置换术(THA)对于主要因骨关节炎、外伤和其他退行性疾病导致严重髋关节功能障碍的患者来说是一项重要的外科干预措施。手术方法的选择会极大地影响手术效果,包括术后恢复、疼痛控制和功能活动度:本研究旨在评估外侧入路全髋关节置换术的临床和功能效果,比较其与其他手术技术的有效性和安全性:在一家医疗教学机构开展了一项回顾性队列研究,共有 74 名患者在 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间接受了外侧入路全髋关节置换术。研究收集了有关患者人口统计学、手术细节和术后效果的数据。主要指标包括哈里斯髋关节评分(HHS)、术后疼痛发生率、肢体长度差异(LLD)以及脱位和感染等并发症。统计分析采用 IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 25 版本,显著性阈值设定为 P <0.05:研究对象的男女比例相当,平均年龄为 57.20 岁(SD ± 14.68)。外伤是最常见的手术指征(67.6%),其次是骨关节炎(18.9%)和血管性坏死(9.5%)。术后评估显示,62.26%的患者在两周后HHS达到 "优",28.38%被评为 "良"。总体并发症发生率较低,4.1%的病例发生了脱位。12.2%的患者在术后出现疼痛:外侧入路全髋关节置换术能有效缓解疼痛,恢复功能,并发症发生率低。这项研究支持继续将侧方入路作为髋关节置换手术的可行选择,其结果与其他手术方法相当或更优。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信