Clinical experiences and learning curves from robot-assisted neurosurgical biopsies with Stealth Autoguide™

J. Ljungqvist, H. Barchéus, Fatima Abbas, A. Ozanne, D. Nilsson, A. Corell
{"title":"Clinical experiences and learning curves from robot-assisted neurosurgical biopsies with Stealth Autoguide™","authors":"J. Ljungqvist, H. Barchéus, Fatima Abbas, A. Ozanne, D. Nilsson, A. Corell","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Biopsies of intracranial lesions is a cornerstone in the diagnosis of unresectable tumors to guide neurooncological treatment; however, the procedure is also associated with risks. The results from the cranial robot guidance system Stealth Autoguide™ were studied after introduction at a neurosurgical department. Primary aims include the presentation of clinical and radiological data, accuracy of radiological diagnosis, learning curves of the new technology, diagnostic yield, and precision. The secondary aim was to study complications.\n \n \n \n Retrospective data inclusion was performed on patients ≥18 years undergoing biopsy with Stealth Autoguide™ due to suspected brain tumor in the first three years after introduction of the technique. Data regarding clinical characteristics, intraoperative variables, pathological diagnosis, and complications were recorded. Analyses of learning curves were performed.\n \n \n \n A total of 79 procedures were performed on 78 patients with a mean age of 62 years (SD 12.7, range 23-82), 30.8% were female. Tumors were often multifocal (63.3%) and supratentorial (89.9%). The diagnostic yield was 87.3%. The first-hand radiological diagnosis was correct in 62.0%. A slight decrease in operation time was observed, although not significant. The surgeon contributed to 12% of the variability.\n \n \n \n Robot-assisted biopsies with Stealth Autoguide™ seem to be comparable, with regards to complications, to frame-based and other frame-less neurosurgical biopsies. Learning curves demonstrated no statistical differences in time of surgery and only 12% surgeon related variation (i.e. variation caused by change of performing surgeon), suggesting a successful implementation of this technical adjunct.\n","PeriodicalId":19138,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology Advances","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biopsies of intracranial lesions is a cornerstone in the diagnosis of unresectable tumors to guide neurooncological treatment; however, the procedure is also associated with risks. The results from the cranial robot guidance system Stealth Autoguide™ were studied after introduction at a neurosurgical department. Primary aims include the presentation of clinical and radiological data, accuracy of radiological diagnosis, learning curves of the new technology, diagnostic yield, and precision. The secondary aim was to study complications. Retrospective data inclusion was performed on patients ≥18 years undergoing biopsy with Stealth Autoguide™ due to suspected brain tumor in the first three years after introduction of the technique. Data regarding clinical characteristics, intraoperative variables, pathological diagnosis, and complications were recorded. Analyses of learning curves were performed. A total of 79 procedures were performed on 78 patients with a mean age of 62 years (SD 12.7, range 23-82), 30.8% were female. Tumors were often multifocal (63.3%) and supratentorial (89.9%). The diagnostic yield was 87.3%. The first-hand radiological diagnosis was correct in 62.0%. A slight decrease in operation time was observed, although not significant. The surgeon contributed to 12% of the variability. Robot-assisted biopsies with Stealth Autoguide™ seem to be comparable, with regards to complications, to frame-based and other frame-less neurosurgical biopsies. Learning curves demonstrated no statistical differences in time of surgery and only 12% surgeon related variation (i.e. variation caused by change of performing surgeon), suggesting a successful implementation of this technical adjunct.
使用 Stealth Autoguide™ 进行机器人辅助神经外科活检的临床经验和学习曲线
颅内病变活检是诊断无法切除的肿瘤以指导神经肿瘤治疗的基石,但这一过程也存在风险。我们对神经外科引进头颅机器人引导系统 Stealth Autoguide™ 后的效果进行了研究。主要目的包括临床和放射学数据的展示、放射学诊断的准确性、新技术的学习曲线、诊断率和精确度。次要目的是研究并发症。 回顾性数据纳入的对象是在引进 Stealth Autoguide™ 技术后的头三年中因怀疑患有脑肿瘤而接受活组织检查的年龄≥18 岁的患者。记录了有关临床特征、术中变量、病理诊断和并发症的数据。对学习曲线进行了分析。 78名患者共进行了79次手术,平均年龄62岁(标清12.7,范围23-82),30.8%为女性。肿瘤通常为多灶性(63.3%)和幕上性(89.9%)。诊断率为 87.3%。第一手放射诊断正确率为 62.0%。手术时间略有缩短,但并不明显。外科医生造成了12%的差异。 在并发症方面,使用 Stealth Autoguide™ 的机器人辅助活检似乎与基于框架和其他无框架的神经外科活检相当。学习曲线显示,手术时间没有统计学差异,与外科医生相关的变异(即更换外科医生导致的变异)仅占 12%,这表明这项辅助技术的实施是成功的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信