Does Curarisation before Hand Improve Ventilation by Face Mask? A Prospective Randomised Study

A. Benakrout, Mohamed Meziane, A. Jaafari, N. Doghmi, Mustapha Bensghir, Hicham Balkhi
{"title":"Does Curarisation before Hand Improve Ventilation by Face Mask? A Prospective Randomised Study","authors":"A. Benakrout, Mohamed Meziane, A. Jaafari, N. Doghmi, Mustapha Bensghir, Hicham Balkhi","doi":"10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i65446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior verification of the efficiency of face mask ventilation before curarisation is most often dogmatic. It is often considered a safety factor. The main aim of our study was to investigate the effect of prior curarisation on face mask ventilation conditions. \nMaterials and methods: A prospective, randomised, double-blind study was carried out in the operating theatre of the Mohammed V military training hospital in Rabat. The inclusion criteria were: patients aged over 18 years, with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II score, scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia and requiring tracheal intubation. Exclusion criteria were: the presence of gastro-oesophageal reflux, the need for rapid sequence induction, the presence of criteria for face mask ventilation or difficult intubation and the need for vigorous intubation. The patients included were randomised into two groups : the rocuronium group, in whom curarisation with rocuronium prior to verification of the efficacy of VMF was performed, and the control group, in whom an equal volume of 0.9% saline was administered.  Improvement in face mask ventilation was our primary endpoint. It was assessed using the HAN face mask ventilation difficulty score and tele-expiratory volume (TEV) during mask ventilation manoeuvres. \nResults : A significant improvement in the Han score was noted at 2 min after administration of rocuronium (1.40 ± 0.50 vs 2 min : 1.17 ± 0.38, p=0.017). There was also a significant improvement in TEV at 1 min (117.9 ± 41.41 vs 289.33 ± 78.63, p=0.004) and at 2 min after early curarisation (167.57 ± 59.7 vs 388.67 ± 38.85, p=0.008). \nConclusion : Prior curarisation improves face mask ventilation in patients with an easy planned airway. Several studies with different methodologies found similar results.","PeriodicalId":506708,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research","volume":"49 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i65446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior verification of the efficiency of face mask ventilation before curarisation is most often dogmatic. It is often considered a safety factor. The main aim of our study was to investigate the effect of prior curarisation on face mask ventilation conditions. Materials and methods: A prospective, randomised, double-blind study was carried out in the operating theatre of the Mohammed V military training hospital in Rabat. The inclusion criteria were: patients aged over 18 years, with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II score, scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia and requiring tracheal intubation. Exclusion criteria were: the presence of gastro-oesophageal reflux, the need for rapid sequence induction, the presence of criteria for face mask ventilation or difficult intubation and the need for vigorous intubation. The patients included were randomised into two groups : the rocuronium group, in whom curarisation with rocuronium prior to verification of the efficacy of VMF was performed, and the control group, in whom an equal volume of 0.9% saline was administered.  Improvement in face mask ventilation was our primary endpoint. It was assessed using the HAN face mask ventilation difficulty score and tele-expiratory volume (TEV) during mask ventilation manoeuvres. Results : A significant improvement in the Han score was noted at 2 min after administration of rocuronium (1.40 ± 0.50 vs 2 min : 1.17 ± 0.38, p=0.017). There was also a significant improvement in TEV at 1 min (117.9 ± 41.41 vs 289.33 ± 78.63, p=0.004) and at 2 min after early curarisation (167.57 ± 59.7 vs 388.67 ± 38.85, p=0.008). Conclusion : Prior curarisation improves face mask ventilation in patients with an easy planned airway. Several studies with different methodologies found similar results.
手前卷曲能改善面罩通气吗?前瞻性随机研究
在进行治疗前,对面罩通气效率的事先验证往往是教条式的。它通常被认为是一个安全因素。我们研究的主要目的是探究事先卷曲对面罩通气条件的影响。材料和方法:在拉巴特穆罕默德五世军事训练医院手术室进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。纳入标准为:18 岁以上、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I 级和 II 级评分、计划在全身麻醉下进行手术并需要气管插管的患者。排除标准为:存在胃食管反流、需要快速诱导、存在面罩通气或困难插管标准以及需要用力插管。纳入的患者被随机分为两组:罗库洛铵组和对照组,前者在验证 VMF 的疗效前使用罗库洛铵;后者使用等量的 0.9% 生理盐水。 面罩通气的改善是我们的主要终点。我们使用汉氏面罩通气困难评分和面罩通气操作过程中的远距离呼气量(TEV)对其进行评估。结果:施用罗库溴铵 2 分钟后,Han 评分明显改善(1.40 ± 0.50 vs 2 分钟:1.17 ± 0.38,p=0.017)。早期镇静后 1 分钟(117.9 ± 41.41 vs 289.33 ± 78.63,p=0.004)和 2 分钟(167.57 ± 59.7 vs 388.67 ± 38.85,p=0.008)的 TEV 也有明显改善。结论:在计划气道通畅的患者中,提前卷曲可改善面罩通气。几项采用不同方法的研究发现了类似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信