Immediate or delayed trial without catheter in acute urinary retention in males: A systematic review

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1002/bco2.369
Veronika S. Christensen, Marius Skow, Signe A. Flottorp, Hilde Strømme, Ibrahimu Mdala, Odd Martin Vallersnes
{"title":"Immediate or delayed trial without catheter in acute urinary retention in males: A systematic review","authors":"Veronika S. Christensen,&nbsp;Marius Skow,&nbsp;Signe A. Flottorp,&nbsp;Hilde Strømme,&nbsp;Ibrahimu Mdala,&nbsp;Odd Martin Vallersnes","doi":"10.1002/bco2.369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the success of establishing spontaneous micturition following immediate trial without catheter (TWOC) to delayed TWOC in males catheterized for acute urinary retention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this systematic review, we included studies reporting success rates of immediate TWOC or delayed TWOC (≤30 days) among males ≥18 years of age catheterized for acute urinary retention. We excluded studies on suprapubic catheterization, postoperative/perioperative catheterization and urinary retention related to trauma. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Open Grey and Clinicaltrials.gov. The search was concluded on 30 November 2022. There were no restrictions on language or publication date. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. We did random-effects restricted maximum likelihood model meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 61 studies. In two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), both with some concerns for risk of bias, including in total 174 participants, the relative success rate was 1.22 (95% CI 0.84–1.76) favouring delayed TWOC. In two comparative cohort studies, both with serious risk of bias, including 642 participants, the relative success rate was 1.18 (0.94–1.47) favouring delayed TWOC. One study was excluded from this meta-analysis because of critically low quality. Four studies reporting success rates for cohorts with immediate TWOC, all with serious risk of bias, including 409 participants, had an overall success rate of 47% (29–66). Fifty-two studies reporting success rates for cohorts with delayed TWOC, all with serious risk of bias, including 12 489 participants, had an overall success rate of 53% (49–56). The certainty of the evidence was considered low for the RCTs and very low for the rest.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There was a limited number of appropriately designed studies addressing the research question directly. The evidence favours neither approach.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 8","pages":"732-747"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.369","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare the success of establishing spontaneous micturition following immediate trial without catheter (TWOC) to delayed TWOC in males catheterized for acute urinary retention.

Materials and methods

In this systematic review, we included studies reporting success rates of immediate TWOC or delayed TWOC (≤30 days) among males ≥18 years of age catheterized for acute urinary retention. We excluded studies on suprapubic catheterization, postoperative/perioperative catheterization and urinary retention related to trauma. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Open Grey and Clinicaltrials.gov. The search was concluded on 30 November 2022. There were no restrictions on language or publication date. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. We did random-effects restricted maximum likelihood model meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

Results

We included 61 studies. In two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), both with some concerns for risk of bias, including in total 174 participants, the relative success rate was 1.22 (95% CI 0.84–1.76) favouring delayed TWOC. In two comparative cohort studies, both with serious risk of bias, including 642 participants, the relative success rate was 1.18 (0.94–1.47) favouring delayed TWOC. One study was excluded from this meta-analysis because of critically low quality. Four studies reporting success rates for cohorts with immediate TWOC, all with serious risk of bias, including 409 participants, had an overall success rate of 47% (29–66). Fifty-two studies reporting success rates for cohorts with delayed TWOC, all with serious risk of bias, including 12 489 participants, had an overall success rate of 53% (49–56). The certainty of the evidence was considered low for the RCTs and very low for the rest.

Conclusion

There was a limited number of appropriately designed studies addressing the research question directly. The evidence favours neither approach.

Abstract Image

男性急性尿潴留不使用导尿管的立即或延迟试验:系统综述
在这项系统性综述中,我们纳入了一些研究,这些研究报告了因急性尿潴留而接受导尿术的年龄≥18 岁的男性中,即刻无导尿管试验(TWOC)和延迟 TWOC(≤30 天)的成功率。我们排除了有关耻骨上导尿、术后/围手术期导尿以及与创伤相关的尿潴留的研究。我们检索了以下数据库:MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 系统综述数据库、Cochrane 对照试验中央登记册、Open Grey 和 Clinicaltrials.gov。检索于 2022 年 11 月 30 日结束。语言或出版日期不受限制。使用 ROB 2.0 和 ROBINS-I 工具对偏倚风险进行了评估。我们进行了随机效应限制最大似然模型荟萃分析。我们纳入了 61 项研究。在两项随机对照试验(RCT)中,延迟 TWOC 的相对成功率为 1.22(95% CI 0.84-1.76),两项试验均存在一定的偏倚风险,共纳入 174 名参与者。两项队列比较研究均存在严重的偏倚风险,共纳入 642 名参与者,结果显示延迟 TWOC 的相对成功率为 1.18(0.94-1.47)。一项研究因质量极低而被排除在荟萃分析之外。四项研究报告了队列中立即 TWOC 的成功率,这些研究都存在严重的偏倚风险,包括 409 名参与者,总体成功率为 47% (29-66)。52 项研究报告了同组延迟 TWOC 的成功率,所有研究都存在严重的偏倚风险,包括 12 489 名参与者,总成功率为 53% (49-56)。直接针对研究问题的设计合理的研究数量有限。两种方法都没有证据支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信