Contractual Diversification Advantage: A Relational View of the Link Between Supplier Diversification and Performance

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
Thomas G. Pittz, Terry Adler, Kostas Alexiou, Mark P. Sharfman
{"title":"Contractual Diversification Advantage: A Relational View of the Link Between Supplier Diversification and Performance","authors":"Thomas G. Pittz, Terry Adler, Kostas Alexiou, Mark P. Sharfman","doi":"10.53703/001c.92986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of diversification on interfirm relationships. Given how extensively firms develop key relationships with customers, suppliers, and other stakeholders, understanding the role that interfirm (relational) strategies are affected by diversification likely will be quite informative. This is particularly true of small businesses, which are not as frequently studied by strategy scholars. A relational perspective suggests that investments in relationship-specific assets, substantial knowledge exchange, combinations of complementary resources and capabilities, and effective governance structures between supply/buyer firms in a partnership dyad can generate relational rents. A foundational predication within our research is that firm diversification will lead to more advantageous relationships with business partners, a hypothesis that we test through contract performance. In our study, we review 240 Research & Development and New Product Development contracts with supplier firms and the US Department of Defense that incorporated some form of risk-sharing between the buyer and supplier. We find that diversified firms engage in contracting with suppliers in a way that provides an advantage over their single-segment competitors in terms of total contract cost, the number of change proposals by engineers in contract work, and longer durations of government contracts. We also find that diversified small firms receive more of a benefit than their larger counterparts in terms of contracting advantage. Based on our findings, it is evident that managers of diversified firms provide advantage to their firms by being more accustomed to complex contractual arrangements than their single-segment firm counterparts. Our findings also suggest that enhanced opportunities for organizational learning are available to diversified firms who engage in contractual relationships. Relational contracts that feature risk-sharing between buyers and suppliers provide space for joint-learning, and it is likely that managers of diversified firms have more experience navigating these risk-sharing relationships. This is particularly influential in a dynamic marketplace as firms prioritize innovation and adaptability in order to thrive.","PeriodicalId":52115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Business Strategy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Business Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.92986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of diversification on interfirm relationships. Given how extensively firms develop key relationships with customers, suppliers, and other stakeholders, understanding the role that interfirm (relational) strategies are affected by diversification likely will be quite informative. This is particularly true of small businesses, which are not as frequently studied by strategy scholars. A relational perspective suggests that investments in relationship-specific assets, substantial knowledge exchange, combinations of complementary resources and capabilities, and effective governance structures between supply/buyer firms in a partnership dyad can generate relational rents. A foundational predication within our research is that firm diversification will lead to more advantageous relationships with business partners, a hypothesis that we test through contract performance. In our study, we review 240 Research & Development and New Product Development contracts with supplier firms and the US Department of Defense that incorporated some form of risk-sharing between the buyer and supplier. We find that diversified firms engage in contracting with suppliers in a way that provides an advantage over their single-segment competitors in terms of total contract cost, the number of change proposals by engineers in contract work, and longer durations of government contracts. We also find that diversified small firms receive more of a benefit than their larger counterparts in terms of contracting advantage. Based on our findings, it is evident that managers of diversified firms provide advantage to their firms by being more accustomed to complex contractual arrangements than their single-segment firm counterparts. Our findings also suggest that enhanced opportunities for organizational learning are available to diversified firms who engage in contractual relationships. Relational contracts that feature risk-sharing between buyers and suppliers provide space for joint-learning, and it is likely that managers of diversified firms have more experience navigating these risk-sharing relationships. This is particularly influential in a dynamic marketplace as firms prioritize innovation and adaptability in order to thrive.
合同多样化优势:从关系角度看供应商多元化与绩效之间的联系
本研究旨在探讨多元化对企业间关系的影响。鉴于企业与客户、供应商和其他利益相关者之间的关键关系发展如此广泛,了解企业间(关系)战略受多元化影响的作用可能会很有启发。对于战略学者研究较少的小型企业来说,情况尤其如此。从关系的角度来看,在合作伙伴关系中,对特定关系资产的投资、大量的知识交流、互补资源和能力的组合以及供应/购买企业之间有效的治理结构都能产生关系租金。我们研究的一个基本假设是,企业多元化将导致与商业伙伴建立更有利的关系,我们通过合同绩效来验证这一假设。在我们的研究中,我们回顾了与供应商公司和美国国防部签订的 240 份研发和新产品开发合同,这些合同包含了买方和供应商之间某种形式的风险分担。我们发现,多元化企业与供应商签订合同的方式,在合同总成本、工程师在合同工作中提出的变更建议数量以及政府合同的更长期限等方面,都比单一领域的竞争对手更具优势。我们还发现,就合同优势而言,多元化小企业比规模较大的同行受益更多。根据我们的研究结果,多元化企业的管理者显然比单一部门企业的管理者更习惯于复杂的合同安排,从而为企业带来优势。我们的研究结果还表明,参与契约关系的多元化企业可以获得更多的组织学习机会。买卖双方风险共担的关系合约为共同学习提供了空间,而多元化企业的管理者很可能在驾驭这些风险共担关系方面拥有更多经验。这一点在动态市场中尤其具有影响力,因为企业要优先考虑创新和适应性,以求发展壮大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Small Business Strategy
Journal of Small Business Strategy Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Small Business Strategy is an applied research journal. Manuscripts should be written with the small business/entrepreneurship educator, small business consultant in mind. Both conceptual and empirically-based papers are encouraged, but they must have an applied focus. All papers must have a significant literature review, be properly documented, with citations from research-based works rather than popular press or web sites. Since JSBS is an applied research journal, each article should include a substantial "Discussion and Implications" section that details how the research findings are relevant for the journal''s readers. Authors are discouraged from submitting manuscripts with extremely complex statistical analyses and/or a purely theoretical orientation. Case studies are acceptable if they contribute substantial to the understanding of small business strategy and include a significantly to the understanding of small business strategy and include a significant literature review that underscores the issues in the case. We do not accept teaching or pedagogical cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信