Mechanical characterization of 3D-Printed carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites and pure polymers: Tensile and compressive behavior analysis

Q2 Engineering
R. F. Faidallah, Muammel M. Hanon, Z. Szakál, I. Oldal
{"title":"Mechanical characterization of 3D-Printed carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites and pure polymers: Tensile and compressive behavior analysis","authors":"R. F. Faidallah, Muammel M. Hanon, Z. Szakál, I. Oldal","doi":"10.1556/1848.2024.00796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing is widely utilized for producing thermoplastic components with functional purposes. However, the inherent mechanical limitations of pure thermoplastic materials necessitate enhancements in their mechanical characteristics when employed in certain applications. One strategy for addressing this challenge involves the incorporation of reinforcement materials, such as carbon fiber (CF), within the thermoplastic matrix. This approach leads to the creation of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites (CFRPs) suitable for engineering applications. The utilization of CFRPs in 3D printing amalgamates the benefits of additive manufacturing, including customization, cost-effectiveness, reduced waste, swift prototyping, and accelerated production, with the remarkable specific strength of carbon fiber. This study encompasses tensile and compressive testing of distinct material compositions: recycled polylactic acid (rPLA), PLA enriched with 10 wt.% carbon fiber, pristine polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), and PETG bolstered with 10 wt.% carbon fiber. Tensile tests adhere to the ASTM D3039 standard for specimens of rectangular shape, while the ASTM D695 standard governs the compressive testing procedures. Additionally, an inquiry into the influence of the primary 3D printing build orientation parameter on the tensile and compressive strengths of diverse materials was conducted. The outcomes reveal that rPLA exhibits superior mechanical properties in both tensile and compressive tests, irrespective of flat or on-edge build orientations. In the context of tensile strength analysis, it is noteworthy that rPLA demonstrated a superior performance, surpassing CFPLA by 30% in flat orientation and exhibiting a remarkable 39.2% advantage in on-edge orientation. Moreover, PLA reinforced with carbon fiber exhibits superior tensile and compressive properties compared to its PETG counterpart. A comparative analysis between CFPLA and CF-PETG indicates that CF-PLA demonstrates higher tensile strengths, with increases of 26.6 and 27.6% for flat and on-edge orientations, respectively. In the context of compressive strength analysis, rPLA surpassed CFPLA, PETG, and CF-PETG by 23.7, 53, and 67%, respectively. Intriguingly, the findings indicate that the incorporation of 10 wt.% carbon fiber diminishes the tensile and compressive properties in comparison to pure PETG.","PeriodicalId":37508,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering","volume":"31 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1848.2024.00796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing is widely utilized for producing thermoplastic components with functional purposes. However, the inherent mechanical limitations of pure thermoplastic materials necessitate enhancements in their mechanical characteristics when employed in certain applications. One strategy for addressing this challenge involves the incorporation of reinforcement materials, such as carbon fiber (CF), within the thermoplastic matrix. This approach leads to the creation of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites (CFRPs) suitable for engineering applications. The utilization of CFRPs in 3D printing amalgamates the benefits of additive manufacturing, including customization, cost-effectiveness, reduced waste, swift prototyping, and accelerated production, with the remarkable specific strength of carbon fiber. This study encompasses tensile and compressive testing of distinct material compositions: recycled polylactic acid (rPLA), PLA enriched with 10 wt.% carbon fiber, pristine polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), and PETG bolstered with 10 wt.% carbon fiber. Tensile tests adhere to the ASTM D3039 standard for specimens of rectangular shape, while the ASTM D695 standard governs the compressive testing procedures. Additionally, an inquiry into the influence of the primary 3D printing build orientation parameter on the tensile and compressive strengths of diverse materials was conducted. The outcomes reveal that rPLA exhibits superior mechanical properties in both tensile and compressive tests, irrespective of flat or on-edge build orientations. In the context of tensile strength analysis, it is noteworthy that rPLA demonstrated a superior performance, surpassing CFPLA by 30% in flat orientation and exhibiting a remarkable 39.2% advantage in on-edge orientation. Moreover, PLA reinforced with carbon fiber exhibits superior tensile and compressive properties compared to its PETG counterpart. A comparative analysis between CFPLA and CF-PETG indicates that CF-PLA demonstrates higher tensile strengths, with increases of 26.6 and 27.6% for flat and on-edge orientations, respectively. In the context of compressive strength analysis, rPLA surpassed CFPLA, PETG, and CF-PETG by 23.7, 53, and 67%, respectively. Intriguingly, the findings indicate that the incorporation of 10 wt.% carbon fiber diminishes the tensile and compressive properties in comparison to pure PETG.
三维打印碳纤维增强聚合物复合材料和纯聚合物的力学特性:拉伸和压缩行为分析
熔融沉积建模(FDM)三维打印技术被广泛用于生产具有功能性的热塑性部件。然而,由于纯热塑性材料固有的机械局限性,因此在某些应用中必须增强其机械特性。应对这一挑战的策略之一是在热塑性基体中加入碳纤维(CF)等增强材料。这种方法可以制造出适用于工程应用的碳纤维增强聚合物复合材料(CFRP)。在三维打印中使用碳纤维增强聚合物复合材料将增材制造的优势(包括定制、成本效益、减少浪费、快速原型设计和加速生产)与碳纤维的显著比强度结合在一起。这项研究包括对不同材料成分的拉伸和压缩测试:回收聚乳酸(rPLA)、富含 10 重量百分比碳纤维的聚乳酸、原始聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯(PETG)和富含 10 重量百分比碳纤维的 PETG。拉伸试验采用 ASTM D3039 标准,适用于矩形试样,而压缩试验程序则采用 ASTM D695 标准。此外,还研究了主要 3D 打印构建方向参数对不同材料拉伸和压缩强度的影响。研究结果表明,在拉伸和压缩测试中,rPLA 都表现出优异的机械性能,而与平面或边缘构建方向无关。值得注意的是,在拉伸强度分析中,rPLA 表现出了卓越的性能,在平面方向上比 CFPLA 高出 30%,而在边缘方向上则表现出 39.2% 的显著优势。此外,与 PETG 相比,用碳纤维增强的聚乳酸具有更优越的拉伸和压缩性能。对 CFPLA 和 CF-PETG 的比较分析表明,CF-PLA 的拉伸强度更高,在平面取向和边缘取向上分别提高了 26.6% 和 27.6%。在抗压强度分析方面,rPLA 分别比 CFPLA、PETG 和 CF-PETG 高出 23.7%、53% 和 67%。有趣的是,研究结果表明,与纯 PETG 相比,加入 10 wt.% 的碳纤维会降低拉伸和压缩性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering
International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering Materials Science-Materials Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
46 weeks
期刊介绍: International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering is a peer reviewed journal. It offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of engineering and applied sciences. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas between engineers, researchers and scholars within the academy and industry. It covers a wide range of application areas including architecture, building services and energetics, civil engineering, electrical engineering and mechatronics, environmental engineering, mechanical engineering, material sciences, applied informatics and management sciences. The aim of the Journal is to provide a location for reporting original research results having international focus with multidisciplinary content. The published papers provide solely new basic information for designers, scholars and developers working in the mentioned fields. The papers reflect the broad categories of interest in: optimisation, simulation, modelling, control techniques, monitoring, and development of new analysis methods, equipment and system conception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信