AI-Enhanced Electrocardiography Analysis as a Promising Tool for Predicting Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Stable Angina

Jiesuck Park, Joonghee Kim, Si-Hyuck Kang, Jina Lee, Youngtaek Hong, Hyuk-Jae Chang, Youngjin Cho, Y. Yoon
{"title":"AI-Enhanced Electrocardiography Analysis as a Promising Tool for Predicting Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Stable Angina","authors":"Jiesuck Park, Joonghee Kim, Si-Hyuck Kang, Jina Lee, Youngtaek Hong, Hyuk-Jae Chang, Youngjin Cho, Y. Yoon","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztae038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The clinical feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI)-based electrocardiography (ECG) analysis for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been sufficiently validated in patients with stable angina, especially in large sample sizes.\n \n \n \n A deep learning framework for quantitative ECG (QCG) analysis was trained and internally tested to derive risk scores (0–100) for obstructive CAD (QCGObstCAD) and extensive CAD (QCGExtCAD) using 50,756 ECG images from 21,866 patients who underwent coronary artery evaluation for chest pain (invasive coronary or computed tomography angiography). External validation was performed in 4,517 patients with stable angina who underwent coronary imaging to identify obstructive CAD.\n \n \n \n QCGObstCAD and QCGExtCAD scores were significantly increased in the presence of obstructive and extensive CAD (all p < 0.001), and with increasing degrees of stenosis and disease burden, respectively (all ptrend < 0.001). In internal and external tests, QCGObstCAD exhibited good predictive ability for obstructive CAD (area under the curve [AUC], 0.781 and 0.731, respectively) and severe obstructive CAD (AUC, 0.780 and 0.786, respectively), and QCGExtCAD exhibited good predictive ability for extensive CAD (AUC, 0.689 and 0.784). In the external test, QCGObstCAD and QCGExtCAD scores demonstrated independent and incremental predictive value for obstructive and extensive CAD, respectively, over that with conventional clinical risk factors. QCG scores demonstrated significant associations with lesion characteristics, such as the fractional flow reserve, coronary calcification score, and total plaque volume.\n \n \n \n AI-based QCG analysis for predicting obstructive CAD in patients with stable angina, including those with severe stenosis and multivessel disease, is feasible.\n","PeriodicalId":508387,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","volume":"31 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The clinical feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI)-based electrocardiography (ECG) analysis for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been sufficiently validated in patients with stable angina, especially in large sample sizes. A deep learning framework for quantitative ECG (QCG) analysis was trained and internally tested to derive risk scores (0–100) for obstructive CAD (QCGObstCAD) and extensive CAD (QCGExtCAD) using 50,756 ECG images from 21,866 patients who underwent coronary artery evaluation for chest pain (invasive coronary or computed tomography angiography). External validation was performed in 4,517 patients with stable angina who underwent coronary imaging to identify obstructive CAD. QCGObstCAD and QCGExtCAD scores were significantly increased in the presence of obstructive and extensive CAD (all p < 0.001), and with increasing degrees of stenosis and disease burden, respectively (all ptrend < 0.001). In internal and external tests, QCGObstCAD exhibited good predictive ability for obstructive CAD (area under the curve [AUC], 0.781 and 0.731, respectively) and severe obstructive CAD (AUC, 0.780 and 0.786, respectively), and QCGExtCAD exhibited good predictive ability for extensive CAD (AUC, 0.689 and 0.784). In the external test, QCGObstCAD and QCGExtCAD scores demonstrated independent and incremental predictive value for obstructive and extensive CAD, respectively, over that with conventional clinical risk factors. QCG scores demonstrated significant associations with lesion characteristics, such as the fractional flow reserve, coronary calcification score, and total plaque volume. AI-based QCG analysis for predicting obstructive CAD in patients with stable angina, including those with severe stenosis and multivessel disease, is feasible.
人工智能增强心电图分析是预测稳定型心绞痛患者阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的有效工具
基于人工智能(AI)的心电图(ECG)分析预测阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的临床可行性尚未在稳定型心绞痛患者中得到充分验证,尤其是在大样本量中。 我们对定量心电图(QCG)分析的深度学习框架进行了训练和内部测试,利用来自 21866 名因胸痛接受冠状动脉评估(有创冠状动脉造影或计算机断层扫描)的患者的 50756 张心电图图像,得出了阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(QCGObstCAD)和广泛性冠状动脉疾病(QCGExtCAD)的风险评分(0-100)。外部验证在 4517 名稳定型心绞痛患者中进行,这些患者接受了冠状动脉成像检查,以确定阻塞性 CAD。 QCGObstCAD 和 QCGExtCAD 评分在存在阻塞性和广泛性 CAD 时显著增加(均 p <0.001),并分别随着狭窄程度和疾病负担的增加而增加(均 ptrend <0.001)。在内部和外部测试中,QCGObstCAD 对阻塞性 CAD(曲线下面积 [AUC],分别为 0.781 和 0.731)和严重阻塞性 CAD(AUC,分别为 0.780 和 0.786)具有良好的预测能力,QCGExtCAD 对广泛 CAD(AUC,0.689 和 0.784)具有良好的预测能力。在外部测试中,QCGObstCAD 和 QCGExtCAD 评分对阻塞性和广泛性 CAD 的预测价值分别高于传统的临床风险因素。QCG 评分与部分血流储备、冠状动脉钙化评分和斑块总体积等病变特征有显著关联。 基于人工智能的 QCG 分析可以预测稳定型心绞痛患者(包括严重狭窄和多血管疾病患者)的阻塞性 CAD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信