Improving Safety Performance in Nigeria’s Oil and Gas Industry: A Comparative Risk Model Analysis

Mgbowaji Zacchaeus, J. Ugbebor, I. Agbagwa, Unyeawaji Brownson Ntesat
{"title":"Improving Safety Performance in Nigeria’s Oil and Gas Industry: A Comparative Risk Model Analysis","authors":"Mgbowaji Zacchaeus, J. Ugbebor, I. Agbagwa, Unyeawaji Brownson Ntesat","doi":"10.9734/ajarr/2024/v18i6669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined a risk-based model for the enhancement of safety performance in Nigeria’s oil and gas sector. A non-probabilistic convenience sampling method was adopted to consider the selected five oil and gas companies in operations within this study area. A quantitative approach was employed using a comprehensive hazard checklist developed based on industry standards and expert insights, utilizing a structured questionnaire to collect data from industry experts, workers, and stakeholders on hazard likelihood and severity. The 392-sample size used was selected purposively to represent the total population of oil and gas workers in these companies. 392 copies of the questionnaire were administered, and 357 copies were used for the study, with a response rate of 91.07%. The analysis revealed key risk factors for oil and gas offshore operations, such as structural failure due to poor design, valve and seal failures, security threats, fire/ explosions, blowouts, and oil spills. Modelling the risk score against the likelihood showed a good model fit (R2 = 0.831), indicating that the model explains 83.1% of the variance, and the likelihood coefficient was positive and significant. Modelling the risk score against the severity also showed a reasonably good fit (R2 = 0.676), with the severity coefficient being positive and significant. However, modelling the risk score against both likelihood and severity showed excellent fit (R2 = 0.994), explaining 99.4% of the variance. The likelihood and severity coefficients were positive and highly significant; this indicated that an increase in either factor would lead to an increase in the risk score. These models provide a quantitative way to assess risk in the oil and gas industry based on the key factors of likelihood and severity of potential hazards. This study bridged theoretical risk management concepts with practical applications and provided actionable recommendations for policymakers, significantly enhancing safety performance in a crucial economic sector.","PeriodicalId":190996,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports","volume":"30 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2024/v18i6669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined a risk-based model for the enhancement of safety performance in Nigeria’s oil and gas sector. A non-probabilistic convenience sampling method was adopted to consider the selected five oil and gas companies in operations within this study area. A quantitative approach was employed using a comprehensive hazard checklist developed based on industry standards and expert insights, utilizing a structured questionnaire to collect data from industry experts, workers, and stakeholders on hazard likelihood and severity. The 392-sample size used was selected purposively to represent the total population of oil and gas workers in these companies. 392 copies of the questionnaire were administered, and 357 copies were used for the study, with a response rate of 91.07%. The analysis revealed key risk factors for oil and gas offshore operations, such as structural failure due to poor design, valve and seal failures, security threats, fire/ explosions, blowouts, and oil spills. Modelling the risk score against the likelihood showed a good model fit (R2 = 0.831), indicating that the model explains 83.1% of the variance, and the likelihood coefficient was positive and significant. Modelling the risk score against the severity also showed a reasonably good fit (R2 = 0.676), with the severity coefficient being positive and significant. However, modelling the risk score against both likelihood and severity showed excellent fit (R2 = 0.994), explaining 99.4% of the variance. The likelihood and severity coefficients were positive and highly significant; this indicated that an increase in either factor would lead to an increase in the risk score. These models provide a quantitative way to assess risk in the oil and gas industry based on the key factors of likelihood and severity of potential hazards. This study bridged theoretical risk management concepts with practical applications and provided actionable recommendations for policymakers, significantly enhancing safety performance in a crucial economic sector.
提高尼日利亚石油天然气行业的安全绩效:风险模型比较分析
本研究探讨了一个基于风险的模型,以提高尼日利亚石油和天然气行业的安全绩效。本研究采用了非概率方便抽样法,选取了在本研究领域内运营的五家石油和天然气公司。采用了一种定量方法,根据行业标准和专家意见制定了一份综合危险清单,利用结构化问卷从行业专家、工人和利益相关者那里收集有关危险可能性和严重性的数据。我们有目的地选择了 392 个样本,以代表这些公司的石油和天然气工人总数。共发放了 392 份调查问卷,其中 357 份用于研究,回复率为 91.07%。分析揭示了石油和天然气海上作业的主要风险因素,如设计不良导致的结构失效、阀门和密封失效、安全威胁、火灾/爆炸、井喷和漏油。将风险得分与可能性进行建模,结果显示模型拟合良好(R2 = 0.831),表明模型解释了 83.1% 的方差,可能性系数为正且显著。风险得分与严重程度的模型拟合效果也相当不错(R2 = 0.676),严重程度系数为正且显著。然而,将风险得分与可能性和严重性进行建模则显示出极好的拟合效果(R2 = 0.994),可解释 99.4% 的变异。可能性系数和严重性系数均为正值,且非常显著;这表明任一系数的增加都会导致风险分数的增加。这些模型为根据潜在危害的可能性和严重性等关键因素评估石油天然气行业的风险提供了一种量化方法。这项研究将风险管理的理论概念与实际应用相结合,为政策制定者提供了可行的建议,大大提高了这一重要经济部门的安全绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信