The Diagnostic Performance of Lung Sonography to Assess Pregnant Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Based on Varied Clinical Severity

IF 0.3 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
M. Mutlu, M. Yassa, A. Tekin, P. Birol İlter, Aysegul Gucuk, Güldeniz Toklucu, K. Sandal, Bilge DOĞAN TAYMUR, N. Tuğ
{"title":"The Diagnostic Performance of Lung Sonography to Assess Pregnant Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Based on Varied Clinical Severity","authors":"M. Mutlu, M. Yassa, A. Tekin, P. Birol İlter, Aysegul Gucuk, Güldeniz Toklucu, K. Sandal, Bilge DOĞAN TAYMUR, N. Tuğ","doi":"10.1177/87564793241252164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography (LUS) and a local clinical triage protocol complicated by varied clinical severities of COVID-19, in pregnant patients who had computed tomography (CT) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary maternity unit, during the pandemic, between March 2020 and November 2021. The pregnant patients included in the study were diagnostically categorized as asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe, and critical, upon hospital admission and their presenting disease severity. All of the patients, as well as those with mild and asymptomatic severity, LUS were evaluated accuracy based on their RT-PCR results. In total, 1531 pregnant patients underwent a primary emergency department clinical evaluation, in the pandemic clinic. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for LUS were 70.5%, 72.45%, 88.1%, and 45.8%, respectively. In this large cohort of patients, LUS was shown to be quick, safe, effective, and reproducible diagnostic tool for the screening of COVID-19 pneumonia, in this obstetric practice. This clinical evidence also provided a new set of triage strategies, during the pandemic, for pregnant patients.","PeriodicalId":45758,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793241252164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography (LUS) and a local clinical triage protocol complicated by varied clinical severities of COVID-19, in pregnant patients who had computed tomography (CT) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary maternity unit, during the pandemic, between March 2020 and November 2021. The pregnant patients included in the study were diagnostically categorized as asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe, and critical, upon hospital admission and their presenting disease severity. All of the patients, as well as those with mild and asymptomatic severity, LUS were evaluated accuracy based on their RT-PCR results. In total, 1531 pregnant patients underwent a primary emergency department clinical evaluation, in the pandemic clinic. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for LUS were 70.5%, 72.45%, 88.1%, and 45.8%, respectively. In this large cohort of patients, LUS was shown to be quick, safe, effective, and reproducible diagnostic tool for the screening of COVID-19 pneumonia, in this obstetric practice. This clinical evidence also provided a new set of triage strategies, during the pandemic, for pregnant patients.
基于不同临床严重程度的肺部超声波检查在评估 SARS-CoV-2 感染孕妇中的诊断效果
本研究旨在评估肺部超声波检查(LUS)和当地临床分诊方案的诊断准确性,该方案因 COVID-19 的临床严重程度不同而复杂,适用于有计算机断层扫描(CT)和反转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)结果的怀孕患者。这项回顾性队列研究于 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 11 月大流行期间在一家三级妇产医院进行。研究中的孕妇患者根据入院情况和疾病严重程度被诊断为无症状、轻度、中度、重度和危重。根据 RT-PCR 结果,对所有患者以及轻度和无症状的 LUS 患者进行准确性评估。共有 1531 名孕妇在大流行病诊所接受了急诊科临床评估。LUS 的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 70.5%、72.45%、88.1% 和 45.8%。在这一大批患者中,LUS 被证明是产科筛查 COVID-19 肺炎的快速、安全、有效和可重复的诊断工具。这一临床证据还为大流行期间的孕妇患者提供了一套新的分诊策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY
JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography (JDMS) is the official journal of the Society of Diagnostic Medical Sonography and publishes peer-reviewed manuscripts aimed at the translational use of ultrasound for diagnosis, intervention, and other clinical applications. The JDMS provides research, clinical, and educational content for all specialties including but not limited to abdominal, women’s health, pediatric, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal sonography. The journal’s scope may also include research on instrumentation, physics, ergonomics, technical advancements, education, and professional issues in the field of sonography. Types of submissions accepted by the JDMS are Original Research, Literature Review, Case Studies, Symposia (related to education, policy, technology, or professional issues), and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信