Apple-Peel intestinal atresia: A systematic review

Q4 Medicine
Francesco Laconi, Charline Bischoff, Theo Michailos, Ongoly Okiemy M'Inserret, Emmanuelle Kremer, Marie-Laurence Poli-Merol
{"title":"Apple-Peel intestinal atresia: A systematic review","authors":"Francesco Laconi, Charline Bischoff, Theo Michailos, Ongoly Okiemy M'Inserret, Emmanuelle Kremer, Marie-Laurence Poli-Merol","doi":"10.47338/jns.v13.1255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Apple-peel bowel atresia (APA) is rare and thus lacks proper management guidelines. This systematic review analyzes various interventions found in the literature for this type of atresia and highlights the outcomes of each intervention with their complications.\nMethods: The relevant literature on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane was reviewed from November 2020 to January 2021. Articles published in English, French, Italian, or Spanish between 1990 and 2020, focusing on APA, were included. Data on demography, clinical profile, management provided, time to achieve full feed, length of hospital stay, complications, etc., reviewed.\nResults: A total of 2495 articles were found, of which only 48 met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 125 patients were treated, with 15 deaths. The most frequently employed intervention was primary resection, with or without tapering, while ostomy creation was less commonly used. The most frequent complication across all techniques appeared to be cholestasis, followed by stenosis of the anastomosis and sepsis. Additionally, there were a total of 7 cases of short bowel syndrome (SBS).\nConclusion: The management of apple-peel atresia seems variable in various centers of different countries. The review failed to assess which interventions could lead to faster full enteral feeding. The distal part of the anastomosis must be considered as an active part in the resumption of bowel function.","PeriodicalId":34201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neonatal Surgery","volume":"4 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neonatal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47338/jns.v13.1255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Apple-peel bowel atresia (APA) is rare and thus lacks proper management guidelines. This systematic review analyzes various interventions found in the literature for this type of atresia and highlights the outcomes of each intervention with their complications. Methods: The relevant literature on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane was reviewed from November 2020 to January 2021. Articles published in English, French, Italian, or Spanish between 1990 and 2020, focusing on APA, were included. Data on demography, clinical profile, management provided, time to achieve full feed, length of hospital stay, complications, etc., reviewed. Results: A total of 2495 articles were found, of which only 48 met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 125 patients were treated, with 15 deaths. The most frequently employed intervention was primary resection, with or without tapering, while ostomy creation was less commonly used. The most frequent complication across all techniques appeared to be cholestasis, followed by stenosis of the anastomosis and sepsis. Additionally, there were a total of 7 cases of short bowel syndrome (SBS). Conclusion: The management of apple-peel atresia seems variable in various centers of different countries. The review failed to assess which interventions could lead to faster full enteral feeding. The distal part of the anastomosis must be considered as an active part in the resumption of bowel function.
苹果脆皮肠闭锁:系统综述
背景:苹果皮肠闭锁(APA)非常罕见,因此缺乏适当的管理指南。这篇系统性综述分析了文献中发现的针对这种类型闭锁的各种干预措施,并强调了每种干预措施的结果及其并发症:方法:回顾了 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 1 月期间在 PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 Cochrane 上的相关文献。纳入了 1990 年至 2020 年间以英文、法文、意大利文或西班牙文发表的以 APA 为主题的文章。审查了人口统计学、临床概况、提供的管理、实现完全进食的时间、住院时间、并发症等方面的数据:结果:共找到 2495 篇文章,其中只有 48 篇符合纳入标准。其中,125 名患者接受了治疗,15 人死亡。最常用的干预方法是原发性切除术,包括或不包括锥切术,而造口术则较少使用。所有技术中最常见的并发症似乎是胆汁淤积,其次是吻合口狭窄和败血症。此外,共有 7 例出现短肠综合征(SBS):结论:在不同国家的不同中心,对苹果皮闭锁的处理似乎各不相同。综述未能评估哪些干预措施可加快完全肠内喂养的速度。吻合口的远端必须被视为恢复肠道功能的一个积极部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Journal of Neonatal Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信