MedAlisto: A Collaborative Intervention Program with FDA-CDRR for Adverse Drug Effect Reporting Among Community Pharmacies in Davao City

Dingding, Sarah, Adlaon, Phoebe, Arias, Ces, Sarabosing, Jhean, Ascarez, Yna, Andres, Ralph, Faller, Erwin
{"title":"MedAlisto: A Collaborative Intervention Program with FDA-CDRR for Adverse Drug Effect Reporting Among Community Pharmacies in Davao City","authors":"Dingding, Sarah, Adlaon, Phoebe, Arias, Ces, Sarabosing, Jhean, Ascarez, Yna, Andres, Ralph, Faller, Erwin","doi":"10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.19722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Underreporting of Adverse Drug Events (ADE) in the Philippines presents a persistent \nchallenge, hindering the optimization of the Pharmacovigilance system. This issue is \ncompounded by factors such as limited awareness, time constraints, and inadequate reporting \nmethods. To address this, a study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the \ncollaborative intervention program (MedAlisto) with FDA-CDRR for ADE reporting among \ncommunity pharmacies in Davao City. The study implemented a QR code system \ndisseminated through standees, cards, and stickers across fourteen local community \npharmacies. Researchers used a one-group posttest case study design and an adopted \nquestionnaire to collect data. Statistical analyses were performed due to non-normal data \ndistribution, including mean, Spearman rho, and Kruskal-Wallis test. Findings revealed high \nawareness (SD = 1.01) and moderate levels of diffidence (SD = 0.44), convenience (SD = \n0.44), apprehension (SD = 0.48) , dependency (SD = 0.38), repeatability (SD = 0.41) , and \nliability (SD = 0.44) of consumers towards the intervention. Increased awareness and usage \nof cards and standees correlated with higher repeatability and liability, while stickers mainly \nenhanced convenience. Convenience (p= 0.012) was perceived as leading to increased \napprehension (p=0.369) and dependency (p=0.100) across all tools except for diffidence, \nwhich was not linked to stickers. Dependency (p= 0.100) on standees and stickers contributed \nto higher convenience (p=0.012) and repeatability (p=0.136), while liability appeared \nindependent in sticker usage. Users demonstrated similar levels of awareness (p=0.756), \ndiffidence (p=0.311), apprehension (p=0.369), dependency (p=0.100), and repeatability (p= \n0.136) regardless of the intervention. However, sticker users found the system more \nconvenient, while standee users felt more liable for using it. While the effectiveness of \ninterventions in influencing user behavior did not significantly vary, prioritizing sticker \ninterventions to enhance user experience and encourage system usage may be beneficial. \nEfforts to address perceived liability among standee users should be explored to improve \noverall user satisfaction and engagement with the system.","PeriodicalId":391859,"journal":{"name":"International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.19722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Underreporting of Adverse Drug Events (ADE) in the Philippines presents a persistent challenge, hindering the optimization of the Pharmacovigilance system. This issue is compounded by factors such as limited awareness, time constraints, and inadequate reporting methods. To address this, a study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the collaborative intervention program (MedAlisto) with FDA-CDRR for ADE reporting among community pharmacies in Davao City. The study implemented a QR code system disseminated through standees, cards, and stickers across fourteen local community pharmacies. Researchers used a one-group posttest case study design and an adopted questionnaire to collect data. Statistical analyses were performed due to non-normal data distribution, including mean, Spearman rho, and Kruskal-Wallis test. Findings revealed high awareness (SD = 1.01) and moderate levels of diffidence (SD = 0.44), convenience (SD = 0.44), apprehension (SD = 0.48) , dependency (SD = 0.38), repeatability (SD = 0.41) , and liability (SD = 0.44) of consumers towards the intervention. Increased awareness and usage of cards and standees correlated with higher repeatability and liability, while stickers mainly enhanced convenience. Convenience (p= 0.012) was perceived as leading to increased apprehension (p=0.369) and dependency (p=0.100) across all tools except for diffidence, which was not linked to stickers. Dependency (p= 0.100) on standees and stickers contributed to higher convenience (p=0.012) and repeatability (p=0.136), while liability appeared independent in sticker usage. Users demonstrated similar levels of awareness (p=0.756), diffidence (p=0.311), apprehension (p=0.369), dependency (p=0.100), and repeatability (p= 0.136) regardless of the intervention. However, sticker users found the system more convenient, while standee users felt more liable for using it. While the effectiveness of interventions in influencing user behavior did not significantly vary, prioritizing sticker interventions to enhance user experience and encourage system usage may be beneficial. Efforts to address perceived liability among standee users should be explored to improve overall user satisfaction and engagement with the system.
MedAlisto:与 FDA-CDRR 合作在达沃市社区药房开展药物不良反应报告干预计划
在菲律宾,药物不良事件(ADE)报告不足是一个长期存在的挑战,阻碍了药物警戒系统的优化。意识有限、时间限制和报告方法不当等因素加剧了这一问题。为解决这一问题,我们开展了一项研究,以评估与 FDA-CDRR 合作的干预计划 (MedAlisto) 在达沃市社区药房报告 ADE 的有效性。该研究在当地 14 家社区药房实施了二维码系统,通过台架、卡片和贴纸进行传播。研究人员采用单组后测式个案研究设计和采用问卷调查的方式收集数据。由于数据呈非正态分布,因此进行了统计分析,包括平均值、Spearman rho 和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验。调查结果显示,消费者对干预措施有较高的认知度(SD = 1.01)和中等程度的不信任(SD = 0.44)、便利性(SD = 0.44)、担忧(SD = 0.48)、依赖性(SD = 0.38)、可重复性(SD = 0.41)和责任(SD = 0.44)。卡片和站牌的认知度和使用率的提高与更高的可重复性和责任相关,而贴纸则主要提高了便利性。在所有工具中,除了与贴纸无关的不确定性外,便利性(p= 0.012)被认为会导致忧虑(p=0.369)和依赖性(p=0.100)的增加。对脚架和贴纸的依赖性(p= 0.100)导致了更高的便利性(p=0.012)和可重复性(p=0.136),而责任似乎与贴纸的使用无关。无论干预措施如何,用户都表现出了相似的认知水平(p=0.756)、不自信(p=0.311)、担忧(p=0.369)、依赖性(p=0.100)和可重复性(p= 0.136)。不过,贴纸用户认为系统更方便,而站立用户则认为使用系统更有责任。虽然干预措施在影响用户行为方面的效果没有明显差异,但优先考虑贴纸干预措施以增强用户体验和鼓励使用系统可能是有益的。应探讨如何解决站立者用户的责任感问题,以提高用户对系统的整体满意度和参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信