Requisites of Deradicalisation: Study on the De-Ideologisation of Indonesian Ex-Terrorists

Robertus Robet, R. Jahja, Meila Riskia Fitri, Abdul Rahman Hamid
{"title":"Requisites of Deradicalisation: Study on the De-Ideologisation of Indonesian Ex-Terrorists","authors":"Robertus Robet, R. Jahja, Meila Riskia Fitri, Abdul Rahman Hamid","doi":"10.32996/jhsss.2024.4.5.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies on terrorism in Indonesia heavily emphasize a security-first approach, which has had profound implications for counter-terrorism strategies, policies, and terrorist imprisonment. This approach, however, fails to properly grasp the internal “deep experience” of terrorists. There are currently 289 terrorist convicts serving their prison sentences in 113 Correctional Institutions throughout Indonesia. Until 2017, over 60 convicted terrorists have been documented for recidivist behaviour and repeating their crimes. This phenomenon raises the question of the possibility of de-ideologization of terrorists in incarceration and if Indonesia’s criminal justice system is truly effective in deradicalizing terrorists. Our study explores this question by interviewing three different groups: ex-terrorists who have served their prison sentence, terrorists who were still incarcerated in prison, and former sympathizers of ISIS who had been deported back from Syria to Indonesia. We explored the social elements and actors that constituted their radical view, their experiences in prison, and the factors that had led them to abandon terrorist activities or disavow their support for ISIS. We conclude that social-legal policies aiming to effectively reduce the ideological reproduction of terrorism cannot be carried out using a heavy-handed security approach, but sociological insights are required to grasp the allure and kernel of truth behind terrorist acts.","PeriodicalId":506933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies","volume":"125 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2024.4.5.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies on terrorism in Indonesia heavily emphasize a security-first approach, which has had profound implications for counter-terrorism strategies, policies, and terrorist imprisonment. This approach, however, fails to properly grasp the internal “deep experience” of terrorists. There are currently 289 terrorist convicts serving their prison sentences in 113 Correctional Institutions throughout Indonesia. Until 2017, over 60 convicted terrorists have been documented for recidivist behaviour and repeating their crimes. This phenomenon raises the question of the possibility of de-ideologization of terrorists in incarceration and if Indonesia’s criminal justice system is truly effective in deradicalizing terrorists. Our study explores this question by interviewing three different groups: ex-terrorists who have served their prison sentence, terrorists who were still incarcerated in prison, and former sympathizers of ISIS who had been deported back from Syria to Indonesia. We explored the social elements and actors that constituted their radical view, their experiences in prison, and the factors that had led them to abandon terrorist activities or disavow their support for ISIS. We conclude that social-legal policies aiming to effectively reduce the ideological reproduction of terrorism cannot be carried out using a heavy-handed security approach, but sociological insights are required to grasp the allure and kernel of truth behind terrorist acts.
去激进化的必要条件:印度尼西亚前恐怖分子去意识形态化研究
关于印度尼西亚恐怖主义的研究主要强调安全第一的方法,这对反恐战略、政策和恐怖分子监禁产生了深远影响。然而,这种方法未能正确把握恐怖分子的内在 "深刻体验"。目前,印尼全国共有 289 名恐怖分子罪犯在 113 所惩戒机构服刑。截至 2017 年,有超过 60 名被定罪的恐怖分子因惯犯行为和重复犯罪而被记录在案。这一现象提出了一个问题:恐怖分子在监禁期间是否有可能去意识形态化,印尼的刑事司法系统是否能真正有效地使恐怖分子去激进化。我们的研究通过采访三个不同的群体来探讨这一问题:已服满刑期的前恐怖分子、仍被关押在监狱中的恐怖分子以及被从叙利亚驱逐回印尼的 ISIS 前同情者。我们探讨了构成他们激进观点的社会因素和参与者、他们在狱中的经历以及导致他们放弃恐怖活动或放弃支持 ISIS 的因素。我们的结论是,旨在有效减少恐怖主义意识形态再生产的社会法律政策不能采用强硬的安全方法来实施,而是需要社会学的洞察力来把握恐怖主义行为背后的诱惑和真相内核。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信