‘An Important Exercise of Care and Attention’: How the International Geological Expedition Was Established in Mongolia

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Narma Kamandzhaev
{"title":"‘An Important Exercise of Care and Attention’: How the International Geological Expedition Was Established in Mongolia","authors":"Narma Kamandzhaev","doi":"10.22162/2619-0990-2024-71-1-18-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. In the early 1970s, Mongolia’s executives ― in accordance with the Comprehensive Program of Socialist Economic Integration ― were seeking to gain economic ground and bring the MPR to the level of its partners. In this regard, a number of initiatives were put forward by CMEA, one be discussed herein. Goals. The article examines how CMEA bodies would coordinate the making of the International Geological Expedition in Mongolia. Materials. The source base for the study comprises both published and unpublished materials from the Russian State Archive of Economy and Russian State Archive of Contemporary History. Results. The approval of the Expedition’s establishment was a relatively long and non-linear process. The three-year review witnessed at least two appeals by the CMEA Standing Commission on Geology to the Executive Committee requesting due coordination of most controversial issues. Conclusions. The long and sometimes heated negotiation process resulted in that key provisions of the Agreement on the establishment of IGE were dramatically different from the initial proposals of the Mongolian side. The meetings of 1972–1973 proved decisive for the future functioning of the Expedition, since the former articulated the main goals of the endeavor. When it came to initiate such an expedition, the Mongolian side’s draft implied its work would be paralleled by arrangements on ‘issue no. 11’ to avoid any thematic overlaps, but this idea was opposed by the European socialist countries. In response, the July 1973 meeting launched a new initiative of the Mongolian side suggesting a detailed exploration of three deposits (a project of joint development was then being lobbied by Mongolian representatives in CMEA bodies). In our opinion, the contradictions were rooted in differing visions of the IGE’s goals adopted by Mongolia and European socialist countries. Nevertheless, the very fact of the IGE’s establishment in Mongolia can be viewed as a completely positive experience, since it was one of the few Mongolian initiatives within the CMEA that resulted in the signing of a multilateral agreement.","PeriodicalId":36786,"journal":{"name":"Oriental Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oriental Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2024-71-1-18-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. In the early 1970s, Mongolia’s executives ― in accordance with the Comprehensive Program of Socialist Economic Integration ― were seeking to gain economic ground and bring the MPR to the level of its partners. In this regard, a number of initiatives were put forward by CMEA, one be discussed herein. Goals. The article examines how CMEA bodies would coordinate the making of the International Geological Expedition in Mongolia. Materials. The source base for the study comprises both published and unpublished materials from the Russian State Archive of Economy and Russian State Archive of Contemporary History. Results. The approval of the Expedition’s establishment was a relatively long and non-linear process. The three-year review witnessed at least two appeals by the CMEA Standing Commission on Geology to the Executive Committee requesting due coordination of most controversial issues. Conclusions. The long and sometimes heated negotiation process resulted in that key provisions of the Agreement on the establishment of IGE were dramatically different from the initial proposals of the Mongolian side. The meetings of 1972–1973 proved decisive for the future functioning of the Expedition, since the former articulated the main goals of the endeavor. When it came to initiate such an expedition, the Mongolian side’s draft implied its work would be paralleled by arrangements on ‘issue no. 11’ to avoid any thematic overlaps, but this idea was opposed by the European socialist countries. In response, the July 1973 meeting launched a new initiative of the Mongolian side suggesting a detailed exploration of three deposits (a project of joint development was then being lobbied by Mongolian representatives in CMEA bodies). In our opinion, the contradictions were rooted in differing visions of the IGE’s goals adopted by Mongolia and European socialist countries. Nevertheless, the very fact of the IGE’s establishment in Mongolia can be viewed as a completely positive experience, since it was one of the few Mongolian initiatives within the CMEA that resulted in the signing of a multilateral agreement.
细心和关注的重要实践":国际地质考察队如何在蒙古成立
导言。20 世纪 70 年代初,蒙古高层根据《社会主义经济一体化综合方案》,力图赢得经济地位,使蒙古人民革命党达到其合作伙伴的水平。为此,CMEA 提出了一系列倡议,本文将讨论其中之一。目标。文章探讨了 CMEA 各机构如何协调在蒙古开展国际地质考察的工作。材料。本研究的资料来源包括俄罗斯国家经济档案馆和俄罗斯国家当代历史档案馆已出版和未出版的资料。成果。批准成立考察队是一个相对漫长的非线性过程。在为期三年的审查过程中,CMEA 地质常设委员会至少两次向执行委员会提出上诉,要求对最有争议的问题进行适当协调。结论。经过漫长的、有时甚至是激烈的谈判过程,关于建立国际地质对比计划的协定的主要 条款与蒙古方面最初的建议大相径庭。1972-1973 年的会议对探险队未来的运作起了决定性作用,因为会议明确了探险队的主要目标。在启动考察时,蒙古方面的草案暗示其工作将与 "第 11 号问题 "的安排同步进行,以避免主题重叠。但这一想法遭到了欧洲社会主义国家的反对。作为回应,蒙古方面在 1973 年 7 月的会议上提出了一项新倡议,建议对三个矿藏进行详细勘探(当时,蒙古代表正在向 CMEA 机构游说联合开发项目)。我们认为,矛盾的根源在于蒙古和欧洲社会主义国家对政府间专家组目标的不同看法。然而,在蒙古建立政府间专家组这一事实本身可以被看作是一个完全积极的经验,因为它是蒙古在中东、北非和非洲经济委员会中少数几个最终签署了多边协议的倡议之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oriental Studies
Oriental Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信