Problems of Scientometrics and its Suitability for Management Scientific Activity in Modern Russia

А. V. Grinev
{"title":"Problems of Scientometrics and its Suitability for Management Scientific Activity in Modern Russia","authors":"А. V. Grinev","doi":"10.26794/2404-022x-2024-14-1-117-132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is a critical analysis of the Russian practice of using the main indicators of sci entometrics in management activities at various levels. To achieve this goal, it was necessary to solve several problems, namely: to study the main scientometric parameters; determine the degree of accuracy and reliability of information indexed by the major bibliographic databases; to formulate a number of principles of management practice related to scientometrics; to identify and consider the shortcomings of management decisions recorded in regulatory documents; to develop recommendations aimed at resolving a number of problems related to the use of scientometric indicators. The research is based on both general scientific theoretical methods: induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, systems approach, social modeling, comparative typological and comparative analytical methods, and practical methods: working with documents, analysis of printed and electronic sources of information, content analysis and bibliographic combination of documents. In the course of the work, it was revealed that scientometrics in its applied version still clearly lacks reliability both due to imperfections associated with both its main indicators in all databases and with the indexing of publications in them, as well as due to management miscalculations reflected in regulations. In particular, in the light of the current political events caused by the special military operation in Ukraine, and in connection with difficult access to Western bibliographic data bases, the problem of a radical reorganization of the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) and the transition to a new system of scientometric indicators clearly arises. The data and recommendations obtained as a result of the study will help management structures avoid obvious omissions and errors in planning and monitoring the scientific activities of university and academic research institute staff, as well as optimize scientometric reporting.","PeriodicalId":517032,"journal":{"name":"Management Sciences","volume":"141 50","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022x-2024-14-1-117-132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study is a critical analysis of the Russian practice of using the main indicators of sci entometrics in management activities at various levels. To achieve this goal, it was necessary to solve several problems, namely: to study the main scientometric parameters; determine the degree of accuracy and reliability of information indexed by the major bibliographic databases; to formulate a number of principles of management practice related to scientometrics; to identify and consider the shortcomings of management decisions recorded in regulatory documents; to develop recommendations aimed at resolving a number of problems related to the use of scientometric indicators. The research is based on both general scientific theoretical methods: induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, systems approach, social modeling, comparative typological and comparative analytical methods, and practical methods: working with documents, analysis of printed and electronic sources of information, content analysis and bibliographic combination of documents. In the course of the work, it was revealed that scientometrics in its applied version still clearly lacks reliability both due to imperfections associated with both its main indicators in all databases and with the indexing of publications in them, as well as due to management miscalculations reflected in regulations. In particular, in the light of the current political events caused by the special military operation in Ukraine, and in connection with difficult access to Western bibliographic data bases, the problem of a radical reorganization of the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) and the transition to a new system of scientometric indicators clearly arises. The data and recommendations obtained as a result of the study will help management structures avoid obvious omissions and errors in planning and monitoring the scientific activities of university and academic research institute staff, as well as optimize scientometric reporting.
科学计量学问题及其在现代俄罗斯管理科学活动中的适用性
本研究的目的是对俄罗斯在各级管理活动中使用科学计量学主要指标的做法进行批判性分析。为实现这一目标,有必要解决几个问题,即:研究主要科学计量学参数;确定主要书目数据库索引信息的准确性和可靠性程度;制定与科学计量学有关的若干管理实践原则;确定并考虑规范性文件中记录的管理决策的缺陷;制定旨在解决与使用科学计量学指标有关的若干问题的建议。研究既基于一般科学理论方法:归纳和演绎、分析和综合、系统方法、社会建模、比较类型学和比较分析方法,也基于实践方法:文件工作、印刷和电子信息来源分析、内容分析和文件书目组合。在工作过程中发现,科学计量学的应用版本仍然明显缺乏可靠性,这既是由于所有数 据库中的主要指标和这些数据库中的出版物索引都不完善,也是由于管理条例中反映的管 理失误。特别是,鉴于乌克兰特别军事行动所引发的当前政治事件,以及西方书目数据库的难 以访问,俄罗斯科学引文索引(RSCI)的彻底重组和向新的科学计量指标体系过渡的问题显 而易见。研究获得的数据和建议将有助于管理机构在规划和监督大学和学术研究机构工作人员的科学活动时避免明显的遗漏和错误,并优化科学计量报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信