Thermospheric nitric oxide energy budget during extreme geomagnetic storms: a comparative study

T. Bag, R. Kataoka, Y. Ogawa, H. Fujiwara, Z. Li, Vir Singh, V. Sivakumar, S. Sridharan, P. Pirnaris, T. Tourgaidis
{"title":"Thermospheric nitric oxide energy budget during extreme geomagnetic storms: a comparative study","authors":"T. Bag, R. Kataoka, Y. Ogawa, H. Fujiwara, Z. Li, Vir Singh, V. Sivakumar, S. Sridharan, P. Pirnaris, T. Tourgaidis","doi":"10.3389/fspas.2024.1273079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We selected three superstorms (disturbance storm time [Dst] index less than −350 nT) of 2003–04 to study the thermospheric energy budget with a particular emphasis on the thermospheric cooling emission by nitric oxide via a wavelength of 5.3 μm. The nitric oxide radiative emission data are obtained from the Sounding of the Atmosphere by Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER) instrument onboard the Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED) satellite and the thermosphere ionosphere electrodynamic general circulation model (TIEGCM) simulation. Different energy sources for the magnetospheric energy injection and the thermospheric/ionospheric dissipation processes are calculated using empirical formulations, model simulations, and space-borne and ground-based measurements. The Joule heating rates calculated from different sources showed similar variations but significant differences in the magnitude. The nitric oxide cooling power is calculated by zonally and meridionally integrating the cooling flux in the altitude range of 100–250 km. The satellite observed that cooling flux responds faster to the energy input, as compared to the modeled results. The cooling power increases by an order of magnitude during storm time with maximum radiation observed during the recovery phase. Both the satellite-observed and modeled cooling powers show a strong positive correlation with the Joule heating power during the main phase of the storm. It is found that the maximum radiative power does not occur during the strongest storm, and it strongly depends on the duration of the main phase. The model simulation predicts a higher cooling power than that predicted by the observation. During a typical superstorm, on average, a cooling power of 1.87 × 105 GW exiting the thermosphere is estimated by the TIEGCM simulation. On average, it is about 40% higher than the satellite observation.","PeriodicalId":507437,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences","volume":"48 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2024.1273079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We selected three superstorms (disturbance storm time [Dst] index less than −350 nT) of 2003–04 to study the thermospheric energy budget with a particular emphasis on the thermospheric cooling emission by nitric oxide via a wavelength of 5.3 μm. The nitric oxide radiative emission data are obtained from the Sounding of the Atmosphere by Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER) instrument onboard the Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED) satellite and the thermosphere ionosphere electrodynamic general circulation model (TIEGCM) simulation. Different energy sources for the magnetospheric energy injection and the thermospheric/ionospheric dissipation processes are calculated using empirical formulations, model simulations, and space-borne and ground-based measurements. The Joule heating rates calculated from different sources showed similar variations but significant differences in the magnitude. The nitric oxide cooling power is calculated by zonally and meridionally integrating the cooling flux in the altitude range of 100–250 km. The satellite observed that cooling flux responds faster to the energy input, as compared to the modeled results. The cooling power increases by an order of magnitude during storm time with maximum radiation observed during the recovery phase. Both the satellite-observed and modeled cooling powers show a strong positive correlation with the Joule heating power during the main phase of the storm. It is found that the maximum radiative power does not occur during the strongest storm, and it strongly depends on the duration of the main phase. The model simulation predicts a higher cooling power than that predicted by the observation. During a typical superstorm, on average, a cooling power of 1.87 × 105 GW exiting the thermosphere is estimated by the TIEGCM simulation. On average, it is about 40% higher than the satellite observation.
极端地磁暴期间的热大气一氧化氮能量预算:比较研究
我们选择了 2003-04 年的三个超级风暴(扰动风暴时间[Dst]指数小于 -350 nT)来研究热层能量预算,特别侧重于一氧化氮通过 5.3 μm 波长的热层冷却发射。一氧化氮辐射发射数据来自热层电离层中间层能量学和动力学(TIMED)卫星上的宽带发射辐射测量大气探测(SABER)仪器和热层电离层电动大气环流模型模拟。利用经验公式、模型模拟以及空间和地面测量计算了磁层能量注入和热层/电离层耗散过程的不同能量来源。从不同来源计算出的焦耳加热率显示出相似的变化,但在幅度上存在显著差异。一氧化氮冷却功率是通过对 100-250 千米高度范围内的冷却通量进行分区和子午线积分计算得出的。卫星观测到,与模型结果相比,冷却通量对能量输入的响应速度更快。在风暴期间,冷却功率增加了一个数量级,在恢复阶段观测到最大辐射。在风暴的主要阶段,卫星观测到的冷却功率和模拟的冷却功率都与焦耳加热功率显示出很强的正相关性。研究发现,最大辐射功率并非出现在最强风暴期间,而是与主阶段的持续时间密切相关。模型模拟预测的冷却功率高于观测预测的功率。在典型的超级风暴期间,TIEGCM 模拟估计热层的平均冷却功率为 1.87 × 105 GW。平均而言,比卫星观测数据高出约 40%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信